Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too ... See more
See more
See less

Principles

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by loseyourname You're going to change the system by ignoring its existence? If every single citizen of the nation refused to vote, then legislative assemblies will be forced to appoint officeholders. Want to see some real tyrrany?
    If no one wished to partake in the holiday of fools and be a part of the system, who would there be to rule? Then you would have what we call a revolution.
    Achkerov kute.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Anonymouse If no one wished to partake in the holiday of fools and be a part of the system, who would there be to rule? Then you would have what we call a revolution.
      Yet another post that's gone off course thanks to your agenda of talking about the same thing in every thread.

      Comment


      • #43
        Refusing to vote would not be a revolution. There are contingencies in place for that. As I said before, legislative bodies would appoint officeholders. Same system, same rules, no input from the mass of people. Where's the revolution?

        Comment


        • #44
          i love anon he is a master of screw up any theory lol
          I'm a monstrous mass of vile, foul & corrupted matter.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by loseyourname Refusing to vote would not be a revolution. There are contingencies in place for that. As I said before, legislative bodies would appoint officeholders. Same system, same rules, no input from the mass of people. Where's the revolution?
            If there is no government by the "people" ( i.e. no centralized ruling authority that uses coercion), there wouldn't be "voting" or "appointing".

            You are really missing the point, for government, as defined by most anarchists, and me, is a coercive territorial monopoly of force.

            Instead of it serving the "people", an abstract entity, it is a life unto its own, in which the people serve the government. If you remember your history lesson, government was created to "serve the people", yet somehow has dilineated from that role.

            "Comparative government", wouldn't be that, since all will be privatized, from legislation, to police, to firemen, in other words there is choice, it is not compulsory nor is there coercion to participate in one system, you are free to leave since all exchanges, as in the market economy, are voluntary, and in order to gain in the market, you cooperate.
            Achkerov kute.

            Comment

            Working...