Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Things Aren't Looking To Good

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Inna: I thought you were saying that women wouldn't serve on the battlefield...

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Darorinag
      Inna: I thought you were saying that women wouldn't serve on the battlefield...
      If I had to then I would..but b/c the law says otherwise then thankfully I dont have to, killing another human being is something I could never see myself doing.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Inna
        If I had to then I would..but b/c the law says otherwise then thankfully I dont have to, killing another human being is something I could never see myself doing.
        exactly what i am talking about. it's about time laws were just.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Darorinag
          exactly what i am talking about. it's about time laws were just.
          well in that case you should take it up with the government and not with me, as I'm sure you know I have no authority in such matters

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Inna
            well in that case you should take it up with the government and not with me, as I'm sure you know I have no authority in such matters
            Well I was talking about women's reaction to such a bill. I meant to say that so many women b*tch and whine about equal rights and insist that women are equal to men on all grounds (even physical), yet when the time comes and things don't look good for them, they say, oh, see, we're different, we have all sorts of stuff happening to us already, like pregnancy, yada yada yada. That's hypocrisy. I'm talking about that. That wasn't necessarily aimed at you though.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Baron Dants
              In a country like Armenia, there is no other choice than to have the draft (for now at least), as the risk of war is still very present. But in the States, where the army is used to conquer more than to defend, I find it useless.
              I disagree. I think it serves to harden up the population and allows people that are benefiting from the state to contribute to it also. I believe that in some ways it will do away with the ignorance of the average American and allow them not only to understand what is going on in the world but also what the US's role is and what it takes to hold on to the amount of power the US has worldwide right now. I mean I myself completely disagree with the war in Iraq, but i believe that if i was an American i would be crazy not to support the war. It is very clearly in the interests of the US, and people who do not understand why Bush attacked Iraq must be blind

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Darorinag
                The draft might, but the argument of who gets to serve in it is irrelevant. Obviously, if there is going to be a draft, both men and women should serve.
                This wasn't about the draft, this was about the draft in light of the War on Terrorism, especially in Iraq, in light of the American empire spread thinly across the globe and battling "terrorists" on a world scale and different theatres.
                Achkerov kute.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by TigranJamharian
                  I disagree. I think it serves to harden up the population and allows people that are benefiting from the state to contribute to it also. I believe that in some ways it will do away with the ignorance of the average American and allow them not only to understand what is going on in the world but also what the US's role is and what it takes to hold on to the amount of power the US has worldwide right now. I mean I myself completely disagree with the war in Iraq, but i believe that if i was an American i would be crazy not to support the war. It is very clearly in the interests of the US, and people who do not understand why Bush attacked Iraq must be blind
                  Michael Imperioli, let's not get ahead of ourselves. First you state you disagree with the war on Iraq, then you say people who don't understand why Bush attacked my be blind, you just made yourself be put in that label. Let's get one thing straight, this war is not in U.S. interest, it is for Israel's interest, and it is having a negative effect on America politically, militarily, and economically. Therefore, those who cannot see the obvious stupidity of attacking Iraq in the name of Israel are blind.
                  Achkerov kute.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    yes.... kids like me. i decide to name call...?
                    meanwhile you sit there and call me things like nerfbrain. i will not sink down to your level. but please get over yourself, you arent half as educated as you think you are. and no amount of insulting and high talk and bull that you post up here is going to change my opinion of you. so i say to you too. get a life, you are in your 20's and if a had a nickel for every post that you had i could buy myself a nice bmw 325i.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by TigranJamharian
                      I think America has enough balls to resist the Israeli lobby.
                      America IS the Israeli lobby....

                      Get over your xxxxin anti semitism please and try to open your eyes and see the benefits of this war to the US.
                      Anti-semetism? Oh no, the magic word is used again. Silence!! Silence! Everyone shut up! This is anti-semetic!!! Burn the anti-semites at the stake!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X