interesting

[garegin]

if u have the word document you should post your research on N-9.

[garegin]

Well, the site did say that it may not all be correct. I think that you should at least be 18 for being involved sexually, however I think it is better to wait until marriage, but with todays society its seems that is more and more not possible.

actually the AOC on USA are mostly accurate. whats interesting it has amid the risks of STDs and pregnancy i never heard that its ILLEGAL to have sex under 17(in NY, of course). hmmm, i wonder why.

[garegin]

where are the legal and political masterminds on this boards when the issue is raised? cmon, this is your chance to enlighten us with consent laws since the colonial era.

[gevo]

This is a nation where business rules.. selling condoms has become a multi billion dollar industry... everything and anything that big in America has a conspiracy behidn it.. why do u think gas prices go up so high?.... they will stay ther and keep rising for no reason PERIOD!!! until the public responds with a massive massive boycott.. in which if atleast 35% of motorists DO not drive for one week.. the crude oil industries can literally vanish.. they depend on every second to make billions.. they cannot afford one second of lesser fuel consumption. no at the rate and expense they produce it... so yes.. it can very possibly be a conspiracy..

[garegin]

what are your legal, social and historical views on age of consent. dont u think 17 years of age is little unrealistic for these "sexed up" teens. huh? the intesting fact is that why doesnt the govt enforce the AOC, whats the point of putting such a high age and then turn away blind to people who transgress it?
i suggest lowering the AOC and enforcing it less liniently.
what do you think?

[Anonymouse]

Consent laws are stupid and unncessary.

[garegin]

govt cannot decide when people can have sex.
sex in its own nature is a very private and intimate enterprise. all i know is that kids have sex and the govt does nothing about it. then why is the law there?

[Anonymouse]

govt cannot decide when people can have sex.
sex in its own nature is a very private and intimate enterprise. all i know is that kids have sex and the govt does nothing about it. then why is the law there?

Why is it there? You tell me. Phuck the government. It's only there to give it more power, and more access to the private lives of individuals. All labor laws, consent laws, etc., should be left to the individual and families involved. Parents and not the government should decide if their kid will work or have sex or not. Government is stupid.

[garegin]

the question is not about: when should kids start having sex?
having sex is your own moral choice. i see parents as a more closer "controler" of people's "sex lives" than the state. its up to the parents to lecture their kids.
if the parent has to rely on the govt to "police" their kid's "sex life", then thats pretty phucking sad.

[garegin]

if the state does enforce the age of consent, then people will angerly protest it.