Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Scott Peterson guilty!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Am I the only one who doesn't care?

    Comment


    • #12
      He'll be sentenced on Nov 22nd....and I sincerely hope he fries in hell for what he did

      Comment


      • #13
        they had not evidence against him, all they had was circumstantial crap. He should have been aquitted.

        Comment


        • #14
          He definitely should fry in hell if he did indeed kill his wife and baby, but since there is no way to know if he's guilty 100% it's better if he is incarcerated for the rest of his life here on earth, and then be judged by the truth in the next life, if there is such a thing. I used to be pro the death penalty, but without 100% proof like definite DNA evidence, etc, I don't think death penalty should be used.
          The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function. -- F. Scott Fitzgerald

          Comment


          • #15
            Here's the funny part. Geragos was soooo sure he was going to get him off, "not guilty in two weeks" was what his co-counsel said with the xxxxiest look on his face. I guess because of the reasonable doubt they were able to present. Btw, guilty beyond a reasonable doubt does not mean a 100% sure that he did it. On average, if we want to use numbers, it comes to about 85% (whereas you need only 50% in a civil case).

            Anyway, Geragos is giving another speech in a couple of weeks around where I live and I think I have my first question. All I have to say is that this conviction is only the beginning. I think the dude has enough money to fight for his life and we don't even know the sentence yet. I wonder if there is any procedural basis for an appeal, although the findings of fact can't be questioned.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Harut82
              Am I the only one who doesn't care?
              Nope... I'm the second one.

              Although... I do hope Scott does rot in hell for doing what he did.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Genuine_Stud
                Nope... I'm the second one.

                Although... I do hope Scott does rot in hell for doing what he did.
                That means you do care, if you have an opinion about it. Dontcha think?
                The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function. -- F. Scott Fitzgerald

                Comment


                • #18
                  So....um....does this mean that Mark Geragos is not as good as Johnny Cochrane?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by ckBejug
                    That means you do care, if you have an opinion about it. Dontcha think?
                    In other words.... the case wasn't a big deal for me.

                    They made a decision... fine... guilty. What's next?

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Baron Dants
                      So....um....does this mean that Mark Geragos is not as good as Johnny Cochrane?
                      No it means he wasn't defending a black person in LA a coupe of years after riots.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X