Tweet
Originally posted by nunechka
so the 12 jurers are killers, and by the 1st degree, because they conciously decided to kill the man...
its not up to you and me to kill people who we "think" deserve to die... i dont know the answer to the death penalty, but i know that it has never deterred any crime, and the US is the only country in the industrialized world that still has the death penalty, all of europe doesnt... as a matter of fact as a precursure to getting into the EU you must abolish the death penalty... and guess WHAT? crime is lower THERE then it is here...
all of the people that sit on juries that require them to choose to kill someone are committing a sin... those people committed a horrible act just like peterson did... except they didnt do it secretly, and they planned it out... they heard about the guy, and said "what the hey, we'll just kill him"
i dont think its our part to judge people for death, thats why when someone kills another person, we want to punish them... so why continue this act???
this is stupid... peterson is a lunatic, were all the jurers also lunatics??? maybe peterson killed his wife to get rid of her, he didnt hear her story before killing her, and he didnt use any electricity, maybe he used a knife or a gun, but nonetheless he killed her, and so the jurers killed him... and now i guess because of the way this is supposed to go, someone is supposed to kill the jurers... or maybe they are forgiven? then why wasnt peterson... at least peterson did it out ot rage and emotion, and maybe he was a bit crazy, (one would have to be to do something like that) but the jurers werent... they just killed a man and now they can go back to their families and homes, and maybe the lessons learned for them was that, as long as the state helps you kill its ok to kill... I suppose peterson shouldve had assistence from the state to kill... poor sap... he is just a lunatic who couldnt get the help of the state... but those lucky jurers, well they think its ok to kill now, since it was OKAYED by the state.
WHAT A MESS!
its not up to you and me to kill people who we "think" deserve to die... i dont know the answer to the death penalty, but i know that it has never deterred any crime, and the US is the only country in the industrialized world that still has the death penalty, all of europe doesnt... as a matter of fact as a precursure to getting into the EU you must abolish the death penalty... and guess WHAT? crime is lower THERE then it is here...
all of the people that sit on juries that require them to choose to kill someone are committing a sin... those people committed a horrible act just like peterson did... except they didnt do it secretly, and they planned it out... they heard about the guy, and said "what the hey, we'll just kill him"
i dont think its our part to judge people for death, thats why when someone kills another person, we want to punish them... so why continue this act??? this is stupid... peterson is a lunatic, were all the jurers also lunatics??? maybe peterson killed his wife to get rid of her, he didnt hear her story before killing her, and he didnt use any electricity, maybe he used a knife or a gun, but nonetheless he killed her, and so the jurers killed him... and now i guess because of the way this is supposed to go, someone is supposed to kill the jurers... or maybe they are forgiven? then why wasnt peterson... at least peterson did it out ot rage and emotion, and maybe he was a bit crazy, (one would have to be to do something like that) but the jurers werent... they just killed a man and now they can go back to their families and homes, and maybe the lessons learned for them was that, as long as the state helps you kill its ok to kill... I suppose peterson shouldve had assistence from the state to kill... poor sap... he is just a lunatic who couldnt get the help of the state... but those lucky jurers, well they think its ok to kill now, since it was OKAYED by the state.
WHAT A MESS!
Comment