Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What If Women Ruled The World?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    there is no "whats" or "ifs" about it, Women DO rule the world

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Sip
      Hell no! In my opinion, that kind of baseless feministic rhetoric actually does more harm than good in promoting the women's cause.

      hahahaaaa, did i touch a male nerve? ooopsie, 'clearly' this is not dan!

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by hyebruin
        'clearly' this is not dan!
        Damn straight
        this post = teh win.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Sip
          Damn straight
          hahaaaaa, don't get too excited now it's not like i posted my sexy cleavage...*i wonder if sexy will get filtered*

          Comment


          • #25
            "How to survive a plane crash"
            Step 1: Ask the stewardess if the plane really is going to crash.
            Step 2: Look around for cleavage, preferably the kind you prefer.
            Step 3: If no cleavage is found, put your head inbetween your knees instead.
            Step 4: Brace yourself for impact.

            Comment


            • #26
              uhmmmm this is a thread about women ruling the world, not samurai's fantasies





              now, get down and give me five!!!!

              Comment


              • #27
                This thread shows that women can not lead the world because obviously their egos are over inflated.

                Comment


                • #28
                  EVERYONE knows that mens egos are beyond what they should be....lol, no offence to any man here. I love men.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    no. Men are simple creatures. Women, are complex, dangerous. I have yet to know a static woman. lol I may be speaking out of anger, but honestly, girls are fickle.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      this thread trutly does bug me like no other... it implies that women are "subjects"

                      there is no doubt that if women were in chrage of MOST things like dimplomacy and the rest that we would be lving in a better managed, humane society... i just imagine my mother making the decisions, and it seems that when i apply it to the rest of the women (MOST) women are much more carrying versus men.

                      women NATURELY do NOT have as much testasterone (cant spell) then men and so we are not as competitive (mostly) and we are much more nurturing...

                      as far as stress goes, this is a misconseption... why cant we handle stress? because we take it out in a different way??? you see i would normally cry if i was stressed out, and then when i'm straight i would take care of business with a logical sober mind set, but MEN! they go crazy, lets say they were teased when they were young they come back to be cereal killers... if a guy is stressed out he takes it out on the people around him more often then if a woman is stressed out.

                      did you know that 95% of gun violence in the world is committed by MEN!

                      so if we naturally do not have the chemical in our bodies that makes us go insane (testastrone), we are naturally not violent and competitive, therefore we are not looking for a fight and even if we are confronted (MOST) of the time we would avoid and maybe even make friends with the people...

                      so think about your mothers vs. your fathers... your mother works as much and when she comes home she cooks, cleans, takes you to school brings you home and still manages to be a great person to TALK TO... if my dad had a bad day at work, no one can talk to him, but my mom, you would never know she had a bad day, she still does the regular things... she is still carrying and if you have a problem she puts her problems away and cares for you...

                      LOOK! poeple i am not saying that ALL! women are this way, but i'd say that 7 out of 10 women fit the peaceful carrying, compassionate persons characteristic, and 7 out of 10 men fit the angry competitive, violent, fight starting, etc. characteristic...

                      so there you have it! it is more likely that if a woman was the president and more of what women want was paid attention to, we would be living in a world that is peaceful, hunger free, and environmentally sound. on top of that women are the natural teachers of our world, we would reward education, and good deed, versus men reward the people with the most money or the most "points", the biggest muscles, etc...

                      anywho 7 out of 10 peacful people versus 7 out of 10 angry testasterone driven war driven people: You make the choice!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X