Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Ankap - Angry at the Mayans for a false prediction? POST YOUR GRIEVANCES HERE!

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1,516
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 40 90 130 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 150 190 240 640 1140 1516 template Next
  • #1391
    Everybody please refer to my STFU thread, thank you, thank you very much.

    Comment

    • #1392
      Originally posted by Siamanto
      Thank you for your recommendation. I have read Freud in my early teens. Nowadays, a mention to Freud is more symbolic, it does not necessarily refer to the person; that was also the case in my post! I thought that Stanford offered a higher quality/level of education! Maybe I should not base my opinion (of Stanford) on your case! LOL!






      Of course! LOL!
      I have noticed that - considering your repetitious nature and the repetition rate- reading randomly 5% of your posts was enough to cover them all! LOL! I'm sure that, just like a broken record, you will repeat last summer's posts ad infinitum and ad nauseum!
      Now, I'll leave you alone for a while because even after a day you became so fastidiously boring. Most of all "j'ai d'autres chats à fouetter!" LOL!
      "Hi I am Siamanto and I post cultured posts and I also display my knowledge of French because it makes me look cultured and I like to post about pipes which are not really pipes if you think about them because post-modernism says so!"

      Achkerov kute.

      Comment

      • #1393
        Oh Siamanto c'mon. Is behaviorism bad?
        Freud cannot be tested. That which is not testable is not science.
        [COLOR=#4b0082][B][SIZE=4][FONT=trebuchet ms]“If you think you can, or you can’t, you’re right.”
        -Henry Ford[/FONT][/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]

        Comment

        • #1394
          Aoccdrnig to a rscheacher at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.

          Comment

          • #1395
            Originally posted by Siggie
            Oh Siamanto c'mon. Is behaviorism bad?
            Of course not! I'm sorry if I gave you that impression! It's simply a different model, that may not be reducible to the Psychoanalytic model. Of course, their may be an overlap.
            Personally, I view scientific knowledge as empirical data/observations [b]modeled[/n] or presented according to a specific model. The words "good" and "bad" are not attributes of a model; unless "bad" means incomplete or inaccurate.
            Models are semantically - and often structurally - different. That's - in a nutshell - what I meant. The keywords are "different" and "non-reducible."


            Originally posted by Siggie
            Freud cannot be tested.
            That is a vast subject i.e. what may be the value of Freud's views? Epistemologist - and for the most part were Anglo-Saxons - would say no. Maybe another day!


            Originally posted by Siggie
            That which is not testable is not science.
            Are you're familiar with Karl Popper's philosophy/epistemology?
            Last edited by Siamanto; 06-29-2005, 09:04 PM.
            What if I find someone else when looking for you? My soul shivers as the idea invades my mind.

            Comment

            • #1396
              Originally posted by karoaper
              Aoccdrnig to a rscheacher at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.
              I'll be brief. Have you heard of fuzzy search? I believe that pattern recognition is based - or can be modeled - in terms of fuzzy search!
              What if I find someone else when looking for you? My soul shivers as the idea invades my mind.

              Comment

              • #1397
                Originally posted by Siamanto
                Yes! Many does not constitute a majority. Did I say that?
                What I said still holds
                1- The majority is only true in the Anglo-Saxon world where behaviorism is religion
                2- Even in the Anglo-Saxon world his contribution has been much greater than what you have stated. My previous post id more detailed.

                Please keep in mind that the world is not limited to the Anglo-Saxon views. The world is far more diverse!

                here siamanto is NOT repeating himself

                Comment

                • #1398
                  Originally posted by Siamanto
                  Thank you for your recommendation. I have read Freud in my early teens. Nowadays, a mention to Freud is more symbolic, it does not necessarily refer to the person; that was also the case in my post! I thought that Stanford offered a higher quality/level of education! Maybe I should not base my opinion (of Stanford) on your case! LOL!






                  Of course! LOL!
                  I have noticed that - considering your repetitious nature and the repetition rate- reading randomly 5% of your posts was enough to cover them all! LOL! I'm sure that, just like a broken record, you will repeat last summer's posts ad infinitum and ad nauseum!
                  Now, I'll leave you alone for a while because even after a day you became so fastidiously boring. Most of all "j'ai d'autres chats à fouetter!" LOL!


                  here siamanto displays his intelligence for all to admire.

                  Comment

                  • #1399
                    Originally posted by thedebutante
                    here siamanto displays his intelligence for all to admire.

                    here deb is NOT being sarcastic

                    Comment

                    • #1400
                      Originally posted by Siamanto
                      I'll be brief. Have you heard of fuzzy search? I believe that pattern recognition is based - or can be modeled - in terms of fuzzy search!
                      My post was purely a joke, but you're right, fuzzy search can be applied. However, fuzzy searches are based on pattern recognition and string matching, not the other way. Some of the common algorithms for doing such complex string matching and pattern recognition are machine learning, suffix trees, time-warping, HMMs and so on.

                      Comment

                      Previous 1 40 90 130 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 150 190 240 640 1140 1516 template Next
                      Working...
                      X