Anon there was no connotation intended. You have sunk into your defensive mode so deeply that you have failed to sense my tone in my post. I was merely defending your views and addressing everyone in terms of not ganging up on changing your views. And that is what I started doing myself, and I do not like that done to me. This discussion was simply to enlighten each other and bring out our “individualism” that merely represents that we all have our own thoughts and political stands which we should be respected for. That is where I believe individualism applies. Your last line was right on target “SssflamessS brought up the example of comparing parents to government, I didn't think of at the time, but eventually we grow up and leave home. So too must we do with political systems and government.” Perhaps that is not to the likeness of many but such is life and you have to deal with the hand that was dealt to you. But I think that a debate should end when judgment and insults come into play and that is the reason why I suggested to end it. But we can go on if you like.
I don’t mean to sound repetitive here, Anon, I respect your views they are eloquently represented backed by much research and obviously much analysis. Your thoughts are very profound and systematic, however I stand by my opinion and disagree with much of what you imply and yet agree as well. I just don’t think that your ideas hold much realism to them, otherwise they are very well rounded.
I don’t mean to sound repetitive here, Anon, I respect your views they are eloquently represented backed by much research and obviously much analysis. Your thoughts are very profound and systematic, however I stand by my opinion and disagree with much of what you imply and yet agree as well. I just don’t think that your ideas hold much realism to them, otherwise they are very well rounded.
Comment