Kurdistan

[Icy]

Re: Kurdistan

It's funny how they consider Kars, Erzerum, Lake Van, and a lot
of historical Armenian land as theirs. Kurds keep trying to take
any land possible, without even thinking of it first, that's why they
aren't even recogonised as a country.

[CRDA-France]

Re: Kurdistan

It's funny how they consider Kars, Erzerum, Lake Van, and a lot of historical Armenian land as theirs. Kurds keep trying to take
any land possible, without even thinking of it first, that's why they
aren't even recogonised as a country.

Kurds do not have a historical background, they did not have a proper alphabet. Their historiographical roots are poor.

It is a bit the same with Americans, isn't so ? It is a young country. In America, Americans consider America as their own land -while it belonged to the native Americans, to the Indian indigenous peoples who were dispossessed of their land.

Nil (Paris)

http://www.globalarmenianheritage-adic.fr/fr/9genocide1915/f_bindiens_americains.htm

#1173

[Haykakan]

Re: Kurdistan

Kurds were nomads they traveled from one place/country to another to find good grazing for their animals.While they never had a country of their own they have been living in that area for a very long time.

[ayrudzi]

Re: Kurdistan

ive been thinking, and i think there is a more peacfull solution to our problem with turks. Instead of the hatred how about we educate modern turks that they are not really turks. It may sound very primitive, but dna shows that most turks are indiginouse to the area. Which means they are just turkified armenians, cappadocians or other peoples of asia minor. It will be like bringing them back to what they were before.

[Artashes]

Re: Kurdistan

Can anyone tell me where the Kurds were when we were dealing with the Hittites? / Artashes

[Artashes]

Re: Kurdistan

Finally , I hear someone say the simple truth. Thank you is directed to ( The Great) from Artashes.

[bell-the-cat]

Re: Kurdistan

Can anyone tell me where the Kurds were when we were dealing with the Hittites? / Artashes

There were no Armenians when anyone was dealing with the Hittites, and neither were there any Kurds.

[Artashes]

Re: Kurdistan

If you think that their is a difference between Hay and Armenia or Hayer and Armenian you are wrong. /Artashes

[bell-the-cat]

Re: Kurdistan

If you think that their is a difference between Hay and Armenia or Hayer and Armenian you are wrong. /Artashes

Yeh sure! I am wrong because Artashes says I am wrong!

I prefer to say I am right because every legitimate historian and archaeologist would say I am right. If you continue to think otherwise, take your ill-informed beliefs to them and you will get swiftly corrected. There were no Armenians or Kurds at the time of the Hittites, and there were no Hittities when there were Armenians or Kurds.

[Armat]

Re: Kurdistan

Yeh sure! I am wrong because Artashes says I am wrong!

I prefer to say I am right because every legitimate historian and archaeologist would say I am right. If you continue to think otherwise, take your ill-informed beliefs to them and you will get swiftly corrected. There were no Armenians or Kurds at the time of the Hittites, and there were no Hittities when there were Armenians or Kurds.

As far as recorded history which usually means a word a phrase written hundreds of years after established people.I no doubt that Armenians existed during Hitities and Urartu times.They were just not formed as formidable force to be recognized as such.
Our language has many Urartu words and I don't think its accidental.
Theory that Armenians migrated from north of black sea along Greece's coastline to south is still a theory based solely on One Greek historians' reference which holds little value.
More likely Armenians emerged from local populations which they were part of it.