Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kurdistan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armat
    replied
    Re: Kurdistan

    Originally posted by bell-the-cat View Post
    Yeh sure! I am wrong because Artashes says I am wrong!

    I prefer to say I am right because every legitimate historian and archaeologist would say I am right. If you continue to think otherwise, take your ill-informed beliefs to them and you will get swiftly corrected. There were no Armenians or Kurds at the time of the Hittites, and there were no Hittities when there were Armenians or Kurds.
    As far as recorded history which usually means a word a phrase written hundreds of years after established people.I no doubt that Armenians existed during Hitities and Urartu times.They were just not formed as formidable force to be recognized as such.
    Our language has many Urartu words and I don't think its accidental.
    Theory that Armenians migrated from north of black sea along Greece's coastline to south is still a theory based solely on One Greek historians' reference which holds little value.
    More likely Armenians emerged from local populations which they were part of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • bell-the-cat
    replied
    Re: Kurdistan

    Originally posted by Artashes View Post
    If you think that their is a difference between Hay and Armenia or Hayer and Armenian you are wrong. /Artashes
    Yeh sure! I am wrong because Artashes says I am wrong!

    I prefer to say I am right because every legitimate historian and archaeologist would say I am right. If you continue to think otherwise, take your ill-informed beliefs to them and you will get swiftly corrected. There were no Armenians or Kurds at the time of the Hittites, and there were no Hittities when there were Armenians or Kurds.
    Last edited by bell-the-cat; 01-29-2012, 08:17 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Artashes
    replied
    Re: Kurdistan

    If you think that their is a difference between Hay and Armenia or Hayer and Armenian you are wrong. /Artashes

    Leave a comment:


  • bell-the-cat
    replied
    Re: Kurdistan

    Originally posted by Artashes View Post
    Can anyone tell me where the Kurds were when we were dealing with the Hittites? / Artashes
    There were no Armenians when anyone was dealing with the Hittites, and neither were there any Kurds.
    Last edited by bell-the-cat; 01-28-2012, 09:22 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Artashes
    replied
    Re: Kurdistan

    Finally , I hear someone say the simple truth. Thank you is directed to ( The Great) from Artashes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Artashes
    replied
    Re: Kurdistan

    Can anyone tell me where the Kurds were when we were dealing with the Hittites? / Artashes

    Leave a comment:


  • ayrudzi
    replied
    Re: Kurdistan

    ive been thinking, and i think there is a more peacfull solution to our problem with turks. Instead of the hatred how about we educate modern turks that they are not really turks. It may sound very primitive, but dna shows that most turks are indiginouse to the area. Which means they are just turkified armenians, cappadocians or other peoples of asia minor. It will be like bringing them back to what they were before.

    Leave a comment:


  • Haykakan
    replied
    Re: Kurdistan

    Kurds were nomads they traveled from one place/country to another to find good grazing for their animals.While they never had a country of their own they have been living in that area for a very long time.

    Leave a comment:


  • CRDA-France
    replied
    Re: Kurdistan

    Originally posted by Icy View Post
    It's funny how they consider Kars, Erzerum, Lake Van, and a lot of historical Armenian land as theirs. Kurds keep trying to take
    any land possible, without even thinking of it first, that's why they
    aren't even recogonised as a country.
    Kurds do not have a historical background, they did not have a proper alphabet. Their historiographical roots are poor.

    It is a bit the same with Americans, isn't so ? It is a young country. In America, Americans consider America as their own land -while it belonged to the native Americans, to the Indian indigenous peoples who were dispossessed of their land.

    Nil (Paris)

    #1173
    Last edited by CRDA-France; 05-06-2009, 06:23 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Icy
    replied
    Re: Kurdistan

    It's funny how they consider Kars, Erzerum, Lake Van, and a lot
    of historical Armenian land as theirs. Kurds keep trying to take
    any land possible, without even thinking of it first, that's why they
    aren't even recogonised as a country.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X