What are you reading...

[jahannam]

Originally posted by felizitation Aman, aboosh aboosh psychology in dere tche, hadjiss.
For my part also, I consider that not reading a book again (a book containing some interesting material) is missing something really important, you don't read some author with the same point of view at 20 or at 35. I should read again Karamazov Brother, the idiot, "crime et chatiment", the identity, l"'insoutenable légèreté de l'être", Pschiatry of the humanitarian work in ex-yougoslavia an armenia, Jungle of cities, teaching ignorance... and many other, but i simply on't have the time.

Anyway, what is the Neitzsche level ? Am I at Neitzsche level ? Are you at Neitzsche level ? Should we be at Neitzsche level ? Should we avoid an author because it became a phenomena ? isn't that the same for every author we may find on the market ?

no...
you're at the infamous "English as a Second Language" Level .

no but seriously...
yes kezee arachin oren chi siretsee...
paits toun tem-s inch oonees??
lol
or is it only cuz I didn't like you?
eseh man mi amchnar... FRANSAHYE MART

[PASAMONSTER]

I'm reading this thread!

you people read too much its bad for your eyes.

[sleuth]

Michio Kushi " the cancer pervention diet""
Ezera Pound"s poetry at night ...before bed...

[Anonymouse]

Europe In The Middle Ages by Willian Chester Jordan
Arturian Romances by Chretien de Troyes
Inferno by Dante
Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer
Das Kapital by Karl Marx
Armenian People From Ancient To Modern Times edited by Richard Hovanissian
Looking Backward, Moving Forward by Richard Hovanissian

[PASAMONSTER]

I hope you guys get to the Niche level if you want to

you know I may seem stupid to some eheemmmmmmmm

but I don't give a rats ass about some dead guys writing

xxxx em
alll of em starting from plato ending with neitzsche.

base your lifes on your own xxxx
I don't follow noones philosophy I don't care about no ones philosophy. I live my life, walking along my path, you wanna walk beside me fine, you wanna block my path and I'll xxxx you so hard in every hole that you'll even forget your mother's face. thats my philosophy. LOLLL



I think the CRT radiation is getting to me.

[felizitation]

Originally posted by jahannam first off, as we all agreed, can we please drop the real name use?
thanx
secondly, you're gonna need to learn WHEN to use the word "criticism".... criticizing is when I find you at fault. and the last time I checked, NOT reading Neitzsche is NOT a fault.
therefore, I wasn't "criticizing" you when I said "I'm ASSUMING she doesn't read Neitzsche"... because Neitzsche is not merely an author, he's a phenomena. and understanding his words takes more than just "i've read Thus Spoke Zarathustra twice"...
I don't care what you read ... I don't care how many times you read what.
all I said was, I've been reading your posts for over 6 months now, and your posts aren't at "Neitzsche"' level.
it's just my personal opinion.
and thats NOT a fault.
get it?
good.

Aman, aboosh aboosh psychology in dere tche, hadjiss.
For my part also, I consider that not reading a book again (a book containing some interesting material) is missing something really important, you don't read some author with the same point of view at 20 or at 35. I should read again Karamazov Brother, the idiot, "crime et chatiment", the identity, l"'insoutenable légèreté de l'être", Pschiatry of the humanitarian work in ex-yougoslavia an armenia, Jungle of cities, teaching ignorance... and many other, but i simply on't have the time.

Anyway, what is the Neitzsche level ? Am I at Neitzsche level ? Are you at Neitzsche level ? Should we be at Neitzsche level ? Should we avoid an author because it became a phenomena ? isn't that the same for every author we may find on the market ?

[whitelotus]

fortunes rocks

its a american lit book, im reading it for myself

and im reading sidhartha again. ( you see, understand, and get a different perspective) when you read it many years later, with a different mentality and experiances etc

[jahannam]

Originally posted by spiral dear, dear, bitter maroushik

Why would my posts convey my understandings of Nietzsche?

We have not discussed Nietzsche in the forum yet, in order for my post to convey any understanding of his work.

I read Thus Spoke Zarathustra twice already, and now I’ve begun The gay science.

If I were to use what I have learned through his writings in order to analyze you, I would say that your constant endeavor to criticize others is an indication of your weakness.

You are merely a sheep.


So, go hold arvestaket’s hand, and say “baaa”.

first off, as we all agreed, can we please drop the real name use?
thanx
secondly, you're gonna need to learn WHEN to use the word "criticism".... criticizing is when I find you at fault. and the last time I checked, NOT reading Neitzsche is NOT a fault.
therefore, I wasn't "criticizing" you when I said "I'm ASSUMING she doesn't read Neitzsche"... because Neitzsche is not merely an author, he's a phenomena. and understanding his words takes more than just "i've read Thus Spoke Zarathustra twice"...
I don't care what you read ... I don't care how many times you read what.
all I said was, I've been reading your posts for over 6 months now, and your posts aren't at "Neitzsche"' level.
it's just my personal opinion.
and thats NOT a fault.
get it?
good.

[PASAMONSTER]

reading philosophy and understanding it are two different things.

it may be true that some here are "sheep", but those sheep are needed for the "wolf" to survive, just like the wolf is needed to keep the sheep in control.

Now what about manipulation?
what if I want you to think I'm a wolf, but I'm truly a sheep?
what if I am a sheep and make you believe I'm acting like a sheep that is really a wolf?


philosophy is to be undrestood not explained. Never look to it to answer questions, because there arent't any answers.

Ohhhh and I'm reading Kahlil Gibran--the Prophet.

[Aphrodit3]

Medieval Folklore
by
Carl Lindahl, John McNamara, John Lindow