Economics

[Haykakan]

Re: Economics

Actually the only thing lacking proof in this video is that the fed was behind the Kenedy assassination. This lack of proof however does not mean that the claim itself is false. The rest of that vid has plenty of things to back it up. They never implied the bank forced the guy to take a loan he could not pay-they said the bank told the guy that he could afford and was qualified for the loan and this was a lie thus the bank mislead the borrower. I think your prejudice regarding this issue is making you hear things that are not there.

I love a couple of facts that they are implying, that some how the bank forced the guy to take up a loan to buy a bigger house. And also that the bank is evil because they foreclosed his home when he couldn't pay back his loan anymore aka as not holding up his part of the contract. Also the whole rothchild BS made this video less than a lie in my eyes. Just a mere conspiracy theory with no hard prove.

[KarotheGreat]

Re: Economics

Here is an other great video: Long run VS short run

[KarotheGreat]

Re: Economics

Here is a little video explaining the invisible hand of Adam Smith.

[KarotheGreat]

Re: Economics

Here is a good vid about the FED you should watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPWH5TlbloU

I love a couple of facts that they are implying, that some how the bank forced the guy to take up a loan to buy a bigger house. And also that the bank is evil because they foreclosed his home when he couldn't pay back his loan anymore aka as not holding up his part of the contract. Also the whole rothchild BS made this video less than a lie in my eyes. Just a mere conspiracy theory with no hard prove.

[jgk3]

Re: Economics

Serjik, after agreeing to stop breaking the rules with your character assassinations, could you answer me these questions?

When did you learn about shale gas? I learned about it only last week. What does that say about my education vis a vis yours?

Without some of the West's innovations in economics (Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations comes to mind), do you think the expansion of England's mercantile empire to essentially dominate the world during the 19th century would've been possible?

What makes you think China will dominate the world?

[Serjik]

Re: Economics

Karo's comments about shale gas says a lot about his education and his ideas about economy and politics between west-Armenia. Karo jan, you livin the good life there is Europe not because of your fansy "economic theories" but because of European criminals sucking the world dry for centuries. But don't worry bro, when the money there runs out one day and them China people start calling the shots in the world you will be growing tomatos and potatos for survival LOL! Its really sad to see brainwashed Armos like you. Join the forces of light Karo jan !!!!

Haykakan jan loved the cartoon on the FED LOL! The system is praying on human nature.

[KarotheGreat]

Re: Economics

(Reuters) - The United States and European Union aim to start negotiating a vast Transatlantic free trade pact by June, though the plan confirmed on Wednesday faces many hurdles before it might help revive the world's top two economies.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/13/us-eu-us-trade-idUSBRE91C0OC20130213

If this happens then this will be one of the biggest free trade agreements in the world. Even the biggest one in US history, bigger than NAFTA.

[Haykakan]

Re: Economics

New York Could Delay Fracking Decision, Leaving Ban in Place








In New York, the decision over whether to lift a ban on the gas-drilling process known as "fracking" is facing a delay after regulators studying its health impact said they needed more time to complete a key review. The move could potentially delay the rule-making process for months, leaving the ban in place. On Tuesday, the state’s top environmental regulator said he may speed up the process by issuing permits for fracking before final regulations are created if the health department concludes the process is safe. Critics say fracking, which involves blasting liquid into deep underground rock, threatens the environment, water supplies and public health.

[Haykakan]

Re: Economics

Here is a good vid about the FED you should watch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPWH5TlbloU

[jgk3]

Re: Economics

shale is extracted by a process known as fracking, which in the techniques commonplace today, require millions of litres of water that are irreversibly contaminated with all sorts of chemical agents. This is flushed in and out of a very deep well, leaving behind sand particles in the shale rock that has been fractured by explosives. These sand particles open up the fractures, allowing natural gas to seep out of the rock and flow back up the well for processing.

Not only is this a hazard for the air, releasing carcinogens and neurotoxins to be breathed in by the surrounding population, the chemically altered water also can contaminate the soil, ruining agriculture and drinking water.

This is a good example of what happens when you put $$$ over health. I expect the world to not be such a pretty place the next century.