Gay Marriages

[Anonymouse]

Originally posted by Dan No no.. I disagree with today's notion of tolerance. In fact, I despise it. I don't want acceptance or love from everyone. I am aware that many will not like my choices and lifestyle, just like I will not like others' choices and lifestyle. However, that does not justify the fact that people call for banning gay marriages. Laws are separate from personal opinions. If I think white people are superior, would I advocate banning interracial marriage? No. I don't care. It's none of my business. I could perhaps go on an awareness campaign to get people on my side with regards to opinions, which is perfectly OK. But I would NOT ask for the banning of interracial marriages, no matter how much I despise them (hypothetically).

Don't worry though. I accept you. I just don't accept your political constitutuents that are a vociferous group bent on allying with Leviathan for their ends.

The problem begins with the State itself. The State shouldn't have even been authorized to legalize marriages. Marraiges should have remained outside of the boundaries of the State to begin with that is why you have this confusion now because the State wants to be in everyones private life.

[ckBejug]

Originally posted by fstkhnan she just happened to be, the worst coach and person ive ever met, and since she's a lesbian, I totally changed my mind about homosexuals...... I used to care less before lol

It is really not right to change your view about a group of people because of one bad experience. Really. Especially since you had the other good experience to balance out the two! You'd be surprised how many people violate this simple principle every day of their lives and try to fit square pegs into round holes, ignoring the clear reality that things are as they are. You cannot bend and shape people to fit whatever form you'd like them to be. True story. Learn to live with it or else life is going to be rather unpleasant for you.

[fstkhnan]

im already living with it no matter what.....I just dont like how bad of an impact shes been leaving on the whole team about herself and her interests......

[Anonymouse]

This thread is gay.



Pun intended.

[fstkhnan]

Originally posted by Anonymouse This thread is gay.



Pun intended.

isnt it supposed to be?

[Anonymouse]

Originally posted by fstkhnan isnt it supposed to be?

Would you ever kiss another chick for me?

[fstkhnan]

Originally posted by Anonymouse Would you ever kiss another chick for me?

why dont u kiss her?

[Arvestaked]

Originally posted by Anonymouse Everyones ideas are influenced by everyone else, sorry to dissapoint you. Everytime you read, you are reading someone elses ideas who in turn is using someone elses. I hate to dissapoint your "uniqueness". I never used the Bible once in my argument nerfbrain. Stop assuming things. Do you think the Framers were Atheists? They were Deists. This has nothing to do with the Constitutional Separation of Church and State, since todays society is a pale comparison of what the American Republic was to the Framers. Thus anything these days can be "unconstitutional" since that is the inherent flaw in language that can be interpreted in any way.

In that case, so are yours so stop using that as an argument.

I did not say that you mentioned the Bible, pube. Again, read what people type.

And what the feck is your point in that last part? Non sequitur.

The fact is that there is no arguement in support of making homosexual marriage illegal. The government, cannot just say no. It does not matter that you feel the language is inadequate and that the constitution is malleable and, therefore, unrepresentative. It is there and should be followed. Whether it is or not is of no consequence. I suppose a comprimise would be, the government gives the power to the state to decide, because marriage law is state governed, and the state puts it on a ballot. That is what you want, right? The majority to decide, which by the way you kept tossing out there as if there was an official vote. I can guarantee that the majority in many states would let it pass; especially California and Hawaii. And one state is all it takes.

[Anonymouse]

Originally posted by Arvestaked In that case, so are yours so stop using that as an argument.

I did not say that you mentioned the Bible, pube. Again, read what people type.

And what the feck is your point in that last part? Non sequitur.

The fact is that there is no arguement in support of making homosexual marriage illegal. The government, cannot just say no. It does not matter that you feel the language is inadequate and that the constitution is malleable and, therefore, unrepresentative. It is there and should be followed. Whether it is or not is of no consequence. I suppose a comprimise would be, the government gives the power to the state to decide, because marriage law is state governed, and the state puts it on a ballot. That is what you want, right? The majority to decide, which by the way you kept tossing out there as if there was an official vote. I can guarantee that the majority in many states would let it pass; especially California and Hawaii. And one state is all it takes.

Unfortunately, for you, your above post shows an ignorance of the American Constitution. The "it should be followed" phrase is completely without merit since if that is to be true, we wouldn't be called a "democracy", nor would we have an IRS, a Federal Reserve, nor the worthless fiat money that you have, nor the income tax.

[Crimson Glow]

I cannot believe the ridiculous freaking argueements I'm reading for voting "NO".

While I don't agree with the lifestyle, agreeing is not a prerequisit for understanding, so I leave it to them to do what they like. We as humans in general are SICK control freaks, always in need of answers, always in need of carved out paths. It is the reason pop-culture is so big, it is the reason trends are set, it is the reason relgions are formed, governments are made, and lifestyles are established.

fstkhnan: How about Armenians get banned from Cali because there are so many bad examples of us there? Take one trip into the AC chat, and you'll see what I mean. You want all of America to think Armenians are garbage because of those examples? Hell, I AM Armenian, and even I felt ashamed. You know what people with views like yours remind me of? The Turks. They believed we had a WRONG and unatural faith, and so they tried to ban our existence, much like you want to ban the existance of homesexuals. Oh, and that whole "it's not natural" argueement is just moronic. Just because YOU think it's unnatural or wrong doesn't mean it IS. You know what else isn't natural by definition of human instinct? Going to the bathroom only in appointed facilities, wearing clothes in the summer time, and monogamous relationships. These are all things taught by society, just as society teaches being gay is wrong. And last I checked, the world is already going to hell in a hand basket, and it sure as hell ain't because "homosexual marriages are on the rise". It's heterosexuals who are cruel, unkind, and not in love with the people they marry (i.e. Joe Millionaire, and 90% of the heterosexual marriages out there), thus resulting in thoughtless, self centered, self absorbed offspring who continue to perpetuate this cycle. Have I bled your point dry yet?

God damn, people. Wake up out of the comma the program has put you in and stop being a pawn in their game of control! If YOU find warmth and comfort being wrapped in the blanket of confinement, that's YOUR problem. Don't get mad at those who have cut themselves loose from the strings of their shepard puppeteers!