Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Gay Marriages

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I have decided that anyone, gay or straight, who feels it is possible for homosexuality to be dependant on personal choice is of the dumbest humans on this planet. The fact that you are willing to make such a choice means you are attracted to the opposite gender. That make you homosexual before the choice, you shytty excuse for a human being.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by dusken
      I have decided that anyone, gay or straight, who feels it is possible for homosexuality to be dependant on personal choice is of the dumbest humans on this planet. The fact that you are willing to make such a choice means you are attracted to the opposite gender. That make you homosexual before the choice, you shytty excuse for a human being.
      Way to display your "intellect" by name calling other people because they disagree, so much for the "tolerant lefties". The fact that homosexuals are homosexuals one day, then change back to being straight or bisexual, or as Dan admitted he likes some women and watches some straight porn, is enough for me to suggest that this is some sort of psychological issue that people have control over.
      Achkerov kute.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by dusken
        I have decided that anyone, gay or straight, who feels it is possible for homosexuality to be dependant on personal choice is of the dumbest humans on this planet. The fact that you are willing to make such a choice means you are attracted to the opposite gender. That make you homosexual before the choice, you shytty excuse for a human being.
        Ok. That and many other arguments are all used for justification by homosexuals. Not saying it is true but they do use that argument. It goes something like what loseyourname said or something like this

        "Ugh do I say being straight is wrong? Just because you like girls and I like guys is my choice and who are you to judge?"
        I'm sorry that I was such an idiot.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Anonymouse
          Way to display your "intellect" by name calling other people because they disagree, so much for the "tolerant lefties". The fact that homosexuals are homosexuals one day, then change back to being straight or bisexual, or as Dan admitted he likes some women and watches some straight porn, is enough for me to suggest that this is some sort of psychological issue that people have control over.
          Like I said before, he has not developed yet. I just want you to see why there were "insults" reserved for this little chap. And you wonder why, after reading his comments, I insulted him?
          I'm sorry that I was such an idiot.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Anonymouse
            Way to display your "intellect" by name calling other people because they disagree, so much for the "tolerant lefties". The fact that homosexuals are homosexuals one day, then change back to being straight or bisexual, or as Dan admitted he likes some women and watches some straight porn, is enough for me to suggest that this is some sort of psychological issue that people have control over.
            I do not name call to display intellect; it is to display my feelings toward a particular individual or group. If you cannot understand that the you are an idiot. As stupid as any other nimrod that posts and thinks he is intelligent just because he is calm about how he is expressing himself. Hint to the nimrods: your disposition does not crown you an intellectual.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by dusken
              I do not name call to display intellect; it is to display my feelings toward a particular individual or group. If you cannot understand that the you are an idiot. As stupid as any other nimrod that posts and thinks he is intelligent just because he is calm about how he is expressing himself. Hint to the nimrods: your disposition does not crown you an intellectual.
              More pathetic nonsense by The dusken in us usual rant of displaying how "unique" he is. So it remains, homosexuality is not something people have no control over, like someone being black or disabled, so stop making stupid analogies. Since you nicely explained that it is okay to name call, I will thus call you "stupid". You are stupid, The Dusken.
              Achkerov kute.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Anonymouse
                More pathetic nonsense by The dusken in us usual rant of displaying how "unique" he is. So it remains, homosexuality is not something people have no control over, like someone being black or disabled, so stop making stupid analogies. Since you nicely explained that it is okay to name call, I will thus call you "stupid". You are stupid, The Dusken.
                Perhaps our topic should gear its focus more towards on Dusken's flaw or atleast a cure for it. Just to be more precise maybe it should be "DUNCEken?" I see his and the others lies are quite befitting themselves as usual.
                I'm sorry that I was such an idiot.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by dusken
                  I do not name call to display intellect; it is to display my feelings toward a particular individual or group. If you cannot understand that the you are an idiot. As stupid as any other nimrod that posts and thinks he is intelligent just because he is calm about how he is expressing himself. Hint to the nimrods: your disposition does not crown you an intellectual.
                  Remember Dunceken, pretending to be smart and undermining others will not automatically make you "smart." If your false claims of others are what help you sleep at nights then be it. But that twaddle you just spouted out just makes you appear more practical.
                  I'm sorry that I was such an idiot.

                  Comment


                  • Uhhh....yeah. Getting back to the discussion at hand....

                    Originally posted by Anonymouse
                    Why murder is wrong is because it is incorrect, it doesn't work, and why socialism failed is because it is wrong, it doesn't work, why homosexuality is incorrect, is because it is wrong, it doesn't work. This is what I meant earlier that atheism and agnosticism promote this sort of relativism and if this paradigm is allowed to continue it has severe consequences.
                    Once again, racing mind. Bear with me. So then....what of heterosexuals who get married, but have absolutely NO plans to have children. Is their marriage/love immoral because it doesn't..."serve a purpose other than gratification and hedonism"? And are you saying everything must have a purpose to in order to be moral? Does that mean any personal hobbies or interests are immoral, because they are merely for self gratification? I guess I'll go to hell for trying to get better performance out of my cars in my free time.

                    Also, the very point that we're even debating this is a good arguement that morality may be relative. Perhaps there are a lot of things most people would agree on, but there are also a lot of grey areas. If the definite truth was that morality status is issued on clear cut right and wrong, how can we even be discussing a different view point? I'm not saying either side is wrong, but if the possibility that it's relative doesn't exist (which appears to be your stance), then this thread wouldn't exist. Ok, I'm just having a piss-poor time explaining this, which is unusual for me. Hope that made sense.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Crimson Glow
                      Uhhh....yeah. Getting back to the discussion at hand....



                      Once again, racing mind. Bear with me. So then....what of heterosexuals who get married, but have absolutely NO plans to have children. Is their marriage/love immoral because it doesn't..."serve a purpose other than gratification and hedonism"? And are you saying everything must have a purpose to in order to be moral? Does that mean any personal hobbies or interests are immoral, because they are merely for self gratification? I guess I'll go to hell for trying to get better performance out of my cars in my free time.

                      Also, the very point that we're even debating this is a good arguement that morality may be relative. Perhaps there are a lot of things most people would agree on, but there are also a lot of grey areas. If the definite truth was that morality status is issued on clear cut right and wrong, how can we even be discussing a different view point? I'm not saying either side is wrong, but if the possibility that it's relative doesn't exist (which appears to be your stance), then this thread wouldn't exist. Ok, I'm just having a piss-poor time explaining this, which is unusual for me. Hope that made sense.
                      That is because they CHOSE not to have kids. The reason why it fails to work with homosexuals is because they cannot actually (naturally) produce a child. It is impossible for them.
                      I'm sorry that I was such an idiot.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X