Fadi, are you really surprised with his choices of sources? I think the predictability of such actions has been established, there is no room for objectivity on his behalf just plain stubborn pioneering of racism.
Fadi - Objectivity? Sources? Don't even get me started on how the "holocaust" is now an established "fact." By that token, jewish survivor accounts cannot qualify as "proof" to the holocaust. What are you talking about?
How about I show you sources from "nizkor" that use the ADL and only ADL in their works cited? How's THAT for proving that the "holocaust" took place? Bottom line is, where you get your sources has nothing to do with their validity - i.e. as long as you are using facts rather than wishful thinking or ideologies.
Now regarding your two protégés, Christopher Brand is a mentally deranged and known racist, he even supports some form of paedophilia…
Thanks for the info, good to know another academic fascist.
And once again I've become convinced that, at times intelligence cannot be held in such high esteem, when morality is so warped the credibility shifts to "0".
As for replying to Dan it's like taking a ride on a marry-go-round, motion is present but it's clear that it's spinning in circles and going nowhere.
saw your stupid replies

As for you, my dear "anileve," I guess some people LOVE the fallacy of "arguing with you is pointless so I will not argue with you, although I can disprove all your points."

Comment