Tweet
Originally posted by Fadix http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/Scientifical
So it's dire, incomprehensible stupidity rather than plain dumb ignorance?
So it's dire, incomprehensible stupidity rather than plain dumb ignorance?
-
Do you see a definition for it? I don't. Nor can I find it in Webster's dictionary. Try again resident pseudo intellectual.Achkerov kute. -
Who are you talking to?Originally posted by patlajan When the KKK developes a "don't ask don't tell policy" you'll finaly be able to join.
Revisionism is not about don't ask don't tell. Exterminationism is. That is how the holocaust has been "proven." And now when we ask for REAL proofs, they can bring none. NONE. They've got NONE.Comment
-
The intellectually inept dizzard, who is surely afflicted with mental retardation should read more carefully. Webster 1913, \Sci`en*tif"ic*al\, a. Scientific. --Locke. Referred as synonymous to scientific. Beside that, Fadix never claimed it was a word. If the term is used even in scientific papers (and even a dictionary), one wonder if all this yapping by this intellectually-constipated dullard is justified given that English is my fourth learned language. Well, here again that “thing” just justifies more and more my decision to ignore him. Calling him idiot would be an insult to idiots, as this pin-head is several dozen IQ points short of being one. I am waiting the day he will return in his village; one wonder why he refused to do just that when his village called because they wanted their less than an idiot back.Originally posted by Anonymouse Do you see a definition for it? I don't. Nor can I find it in Webster's dictionary. Try again resident pseudo intellectual.Last edited by Fadix; 03-27-2004, 01:03 PM.Comment
-
Still waiting and waiting Danny...Originally posted by Darorinag Who are you talking to?
Revisionism is not about don't ask don't tell. Exterminationism is. That is how the holocaust has been "proven." And now when we ask for REAL proofs, they can bring none. NONE. They've got NONE.Comment
-
An interesting read on Soviets & the holocaust would be Carlos Porter's Made in Russia: The Holocaust.
I haven't read the book myself, but I've read a review of it.
It deals with the Nuremberg documents. What is striking about it is that it deals at length with the Katyn massacres and the forged documents that were presented against the Germans at the Nuremberg trials, but which were later discovered to have been faked by the Soviets.
Book review here:
Sadly, the book is not available at my library, so I will have to order it online and HOPE that it wouldn't be confiscated by the Canadian authorities....Comment
-
Waiting and waiting...Originally posted by Darorinag An interesting read on Soviets & the holocaust would be Carlos Porter's Made in Russia: The Holocaust.
I haven't read the book myself, but I've read a review of it.
It deals with the Nuremberg documents. What is striking about it is that it deals at length with the Katyn massacres and the forged documents that were presented against the Germans at the Nuremberg trials, but which were later discovered to have been faked by the Soviets.
Book review here:
Sadly, the book is not available at my library, so I will have to order it online and HOPE that it wouldn't be confiscated by the Canadian authorities....Comment
-
And now the Fadix refers to himself in the third person as if to suggest a malfunction cheap version of Unix.Originally posted by Fadix The intellectually inept dizzard, who is surely afflicted with mental retardation should read more carefully. Webster 1913, \Sci`en*tif"ic*al\, a. Scientific. --Locke. Referred as synonymous to scientific. Beside that, Fadix never claimed it was a word. If the term is used even in scientific papers (and even a dictionary), one wonder if all this yapping by this intellectually-constipated dullard is justified given that English is my fourth learned language. Well, here again that “thing” just justifies more and more my decision to ignore him. Calling him idiot would be an insult to idiots, as this pin-head is several dozen IQ points short of being one. I am waiting the day he will return in his village; one wonder why he refused to do just that when his village called because they wanted their less than an idiot back.Achkerov kute.Comment
-
Is Fadix increasing his post count again? I don't see what he's writing. Hmmm.. Anyway, I can only see what he's posted if people quote him. I hope I'm not missing too much laughter.
Comment
-
Dan, instead of changing the topic once again, why don't you finally go back on topic as so many times you have said you are trying to do? Why don't you bring forth an "exterminationalist" (or whatever the heck you guys are calling it) book, and tear it to pieces by your analysis?
Fadix has been asking for this since page I don't know what and somehow everyone just keeps fighting and ignoring the basic issue at hand. You have said yourself you read such books and since you have chosen to accept the "revisionist" view, then surely you have some analysis which debunks the exterminationist views. So please do share.this post = teh win.Comment
-
Striking similarities - Katyn & Auschwitz:
Point 1:
KATYN
Russian prosecutors submitted their 'Soviet Katyn War-Crimes Report' (Document USSR-54) written by Burenko, Tolstoi, and Nikolai, with excerpts of written statements from over 100 "eye-witnesses" who said the Germans murdered 11,000 Polish officers in the Katyn forest in Autumn, 1941. It also had results of the October, 1944 Soviet Katyn investigation with 8 receipts dated 1941 supposedly found on the corpses.
AUSCHWITZ
Russian prosecutors submitted their 'Soviet Auschwitz War-Crimes Report' (Document USSR-8) written by Burenko and Nikolai who also wrote the Katyn report, and a third man Lyssenko. It had excerpts from written statements of dozens of "eye-witnesses" who described sadistic medical experiments, torture, gassings and other murders. 10,000 were said to have been gassed and cremated daily for a total of 4 million.
Point 2:
KATYN
U.S. and British prosecutors had the lengthy German 1943 forensic report with irrefutable proof Soviets murdered the officers in April 1940, so they recognized the Soviet 1944 and 1946 reports were both frauds. Prosecutors did not discuss this decision in court but dropped the charges, for if they admitted the Germans were innocent it would have meant the Soviets were guilty.
AUSCHWITZ
U.S. and British prosecutors did not order forensic experts to visit Auschwitz and prepare a report, which they could have done, and German defenders were prevented from sending their own forensic team to Auschwitz as it was in the Soviet zone. The Soviet charges were therefore adopted without the Germans being able to properly defend themselves.
Point 3:
KATYN
Document USSR-54 is a fraud as admitted by the Russians. In 1992 the Soviets released a letter dated March 5th, 1940 from Security Chief Laventi Beria and signed by Stalin, Molotov, Voroshilov, and Mikoyan ordering the execution of 25,700 Polish army officers, policemen, landowners, priests, state officials, and other community leaders as "potential threats to the future Soviet-Polish state". A 1959 Russian police report stated that 21,857, or 85%, were executed in 1940.
AUSCHWITZ
The Katyn and Auschwitz reports were both written by the same 2 men using excerpts from supposed "eye-witness" descriptions. In 1946 German forensic studies showed the Katyn report was a fraud. And 50 years later in the 1990's study by researchers and scientists have proved what the Germans were prevented from proving in 1946, that the Auschwitz report is also a fraud as it would have been impossible for inmates to have been murdered and cremated as described in Document USSR-8.
References:
Katyn Document USSR-54: http://www.codoh.com/trials/trikatyn.html
Auschwitz Document USSR-8: http://www.codoh.com/trials/triussr8.html
---
Comments invited.Comment
Comment