Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

notes / comments

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: notes / comments

    Sunday, October 08, 2006
    *************************************
    ON THE MARK FOLEY SCANDAL
    *********************************************
    Most crimes are never solved. Likewise, most cover-ups are never uncovered. Placed in this context, the Mark Foley cover-up makes perfect sense.
    *
    ON ORGANIZED RELIGIONS
    *************************************
    If you have been successful in fooling millions of people for a thousand years or more, you have a good chance of fooling them for at least another thousand.
    *
    GOOD VERSUS BAD IDEAS
    ***************************************
    Even the best ideas are vulnerable to perversion. A good idea in step one may be a bad idea in step two. This explains why very often it is not easy to discriminate good from bad ideas.
    *
    ON EDUCATION
    ***************************
    The true aim of education consists in preparing young minds to oppose injustice even if doing so may be against one’s own self-interest.
    *
    ON UNDERSTANDING
    **********************************
    Understanding is acquired less by means of explanations and more through painful experiences.
    *
    ON WRITING
    ***************************
    In an elementary school textbook on how to write, I read: “Turn someone you dislike into an animal.” I have never done that, but I have turned someone I disliked into two animals by calling him “Jack S. Avanakian.”
    *
    Franz Kafka: “In the battle between the world and you, back the world.” He should have added: To write means backing yourself even when you know you are backing a sure loser.
    #
    Monday, October 09, 2006
    ******************************************
    In the preamble of Arshak’s THE SOLITARY WOLFE: NOVELLAS (700 pages, Yerevan: 2005) we read the following: “In the 20th Century predatory nations used religion and ideology as weapons with which to annihilate their enemies. By contrast, we the naïve were taken in by new and old religions and sacrificed our homeland to them.”
    *
    We the naïve? I find that hard to swallow. I was brought up to believe Armenians are just about the smartest people on earth. So much so that even when I was taken in by idiots I thought of myself as smart. It took me not just years but decades to catch up with reality. Which may suggest that neither the Ottomans nor the Soviets were as successful in brainwashing us as we were in brainwashing ourselves.
    *
    Bernard-Henri Levy (French critic and philosopher): “The Pope’s interpretation of jihad may have been offensive, but infinitely more offensive is justifying in the name of Islam human bombs, 9/11, the stoning of women caught in adultery, the beheading of a xxxish journalist, and the indiscriminate slaughter of fellow Muslims not only in Darfur but also in Iraq, as they stand by the gate of a mosque. The Pope should have mentioned these things.”
    #
    Tuesday, October 10, 2006
    ********************************************
    HOW TO COMBAT CORRUPTION
    ********************************************
    Corruption means much more than the penetration of the social fabric by crooks and bloodsuckers; corruption means the systematic alienation of all honest men, in the same way that mediocrity means the systematic alienation of all those whose aim is to achieve excellence.
    *
    Corruption is as old as mankind; so are ways of combating it. History provides us with many examples. The following suggestions are based on methods that have been employed in the past with some degree of success.
    *
    To editors and publishers: print more articles, case histories, and commentaries on corruption and less on Turkish denials; and if that’s too much to ask, adopt an equal opportunity policy: for every headline on Turks publish one on Armenians -- and I don’t mean bald-headed tennis players.
    *
    To lawyers: provide pro bono services to victims of corruption, take the bloodsuckers to court, and if necessary go to jail. They may jail a few, but they don’t have enough jails to lock up everyone.
    *
    To benevolent institutions: withdraw financial support from organizations that lack high standards of accountability.
    *
    To tourists: let the relevant agencies and bureaucracies know that henceforth you plan to stay home or travel only to countries where you are more welcome.
    *
    To those who say some of these tactics may penalize the victims more than the victimizers, I say, maybe, but for only a limited time (less than a year or at most two). Which is far more preferable than the alternative of adopting a wait-and-see and hope-for-the-best stance until the rotten structure collapses under its own weight (which may take forty or fifty years).
    *
    History is clear on this point: corrupt power structures do not as a rule reform themselves. Consider the cases of the Roman Empire, and more recently of the Ottoman and Soviet Empires? This much said, I am willing to concede that all this talk about combating corruption in our context might as well be an academic exercise in futility because we are as much victims of corruption, mediocrity, and incompetence in the Diaspora as they are in the Homeland. That’s because the number one concern of our self-appointed elites is number one, and to hell with underdogs and victims, even when they happen to be our brothers.
    #
    Wednesday, October 11, 2006
    *********************************************
    MEN AND BOOKS.
    GOD AND THE DEVIL.
    ******************************************
    I approach a new book as if it held a secret that may change the course of my life. If most books disappoint me, it may be because I expect too much from them.
    *
    If most men disappoint us, it may be because we make too many unreasonable demands on them. On the day we convince ourselves that the average man is very much like ourselves, a bundle of contradictions and a self-centered bastard with the potential of a hero or a saint, we may be more willing to see the potential and to ignore the actual.
    *
    Divine impartiality makes sense only if both sides of a conflict are evenly matched. But when a hoodlum rapes and kills a child, we can no longer speak of divine impartiality, only of satanic indifference.
    *
    For millions of years men believed in an Unnamable and Incomprehensible Being who was the source of good as well as evil. Traces of this belief survive today in the Lord’s Prayer when we say to God “Lead us not into temptation,” which we are taught to believe belongs to the Devil’s agenda.
    *
    By departmentalizing the Incomprehensible into God and the Devil, so-called civilized man has allowed bloodthirsty fanatics to commit all kinds of atrocities in the name of God, when in fact it’s in the name of the Other one.
    *
    Whenever pundits speak of Muslim aberration they feel obliged to cite the Crusades, religious wars, and the Inquisition, completely ignoring the fact that Christian aberrations belong to the irrevocable past, and that Muslim terrorism is rooted less in the Koran and more in money from oil -- they have so much of it that they think they can take over the world.
    *
    As the last but one Pope said when he visited a mosque, both Christians and Muslims believe in the same God who is love, mercy, and compassion. What the good Pope failed to say is that what we believe may well be propaganda.
    #
    an armenian in glendale: message from a friend
    **************************** ***********************

    > Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:10:06 +0100
    > From: vahe@vernatun. org
    > To: karslyanin@yahoo. com; louisa@vernatun. org;
    > armine_barseghyan@ yahoo.ca;
    > marinadelalyan@ clix.pt; [email protected]
    > CC: [email protected]; DGrigorian@imf. org;
    > aaleksanyan@ yahoo.com;
    > nikol@arminco. com;akep@swipnet. se;
    > [email protected]; nadiyka@mail. ru;
    > arabaliozian@ yahoo.com; Armen77@aol. com;
    > henry.sev@sbcglobal .net; denisdonikian@ free.fr;
    > Subject: Support Network of Friends - Vahe
    > Avetian: Argent!
    >
    > Hello Dear Friends,
    >
    > I write this letter to inform you, that I am in
    > Glendale, Los Angeles, USA, where I came to
    > visit some friends, artists, to look around, to
    > hold literary meetings if possible.
    > As soon I came, I was invited to a literary
    > meeting dedicated to Vahe Oshakan, in the
    > municipal library. As soon I came in and sat
    > down a gentleman whom I don't know told from
    > the scene:
    > - "Hamazgayin" was always supportive to
    > writers, to preserve of literature and the
    > language.
    > - You are lying:
    > I told from my place, and may be it was wrong.
    > - Thank you:
    > the answer was.
    > - You are welcome:
    > was my answer.
    >
    > After the gentleman a lady whom I also don't
    > know spoke longer, more interesting and less
    > ambitions so it was fun and I head the time to
    > realize that situation was embarrassed and some
    > explanations shall be given.
    > As soon the lady finished het speech, I went up
    > to the scene, came to the microphone on a
    > something big, with golden "HAMAZGAYIN" letters
    > on:
    > - My name is Vahe Avetian. I am an Armenian
    > writer, author of 6 books on three languages
    > and I am accused in crime in the motherland
    > where I do not live 15 years already, because
    > of books of mine.
    > - No one wants to hear you! Shut up:
    > some one shouted from the hall and a couple of
    > dozen people started to shout and scream and
    > they attacked me.
    > I really became scared, couldn't see properly
    > because of the strong lights directed towards
    > me. Some one was shouting:
    > - Record, record, and don’t stop the cameras.
    > I thought they'll attack me and I dropped the
    > first microphone on the flour. I turned around
    > to go away and that big something with the
    > second microphone was on my way. Couple of
    > dozen fat asses was breathing behind me
    > already. I pushed the thing and it felled down.
    > I went farther, not successful enough.
    > Hostile tribe of mine surrounded me and started
    > to push, to scrim on my face all kind of dirt.
    > Couple of dozen hating people. They were like
    > crazy. I as not allowed to go away from the
    > hall.
    > - Keep your hands away:
    > I shouted on some one who was trying to hold my
    > hands and keep me there.
    > - Call police:
    > some one shouted.
    > - Already done:
    > an other told.
    > The police came. A lady and a gentleman from
    > our tribe told them that I hit them. I didn't.
    > I was not asked something properly.
    > I was arrested, was brought to the Glendale
    > jail by an Armenian police officer, who put 20
    > 000 $ bail on me, in difference to the previous
    > amount, 5000$, which was told by the other
    > colleges of our compatriot, to my friends Sev,
    > Armen, Anush, Narine and Gayane, who were with.
    >
    > My friends couldn't invest the needed amount to
    > bond me out, until they didn't found David, who
    > paid the bail and I was freed from the prison
    > on Monday. The arrest was on Friday evening.
    >
    > I probably will write stories about the jail in
    > Glendale in some future: I have lot of material
    > collected, but let us go back to our tribe and
    > my self. The police officer has dashnak
    > orientation: I've heard from concerned
    > citizens, living here.
    > I spoke about the matter to a guy; the name was
    > Bill Hamparian or may be some thing else, am
    > not sure. He is participating in congress
    > elections and nominated from the democrats or
    > greens. He is also an attorney and public
    > servant since 1990 as he told me.
    > - Be careful with Glendale police and dashnaks:
    > was his resume.
    > - They are connected to the mafia.
    > I meet dozens in the streets of the Glendale
    > each day and can't find out if those guys are
    > commissars because of there convictions or they
    > get salary from the motherland.
    > Both cases are bizarre.
    > Summary of the message:
    > Every thing in Armenia is good, every thing in
    > USA is bad and I shall keep my mouth shut,
    > other wise it will be not OK and it is easy to
    > kill a person in LA too.
    > I am amused. The situation is so wearied, that
    > I am not even scared. I just look around and
    > wait.
    > The first hearing in the court is on 25th of
    > October and will see what is happening.
    > Until then: I need your support, brothers and
    > sisters. That is what my lower Angela Barsegian
    > is telling: I am in a need of support network
    > of friends.
    >
    > Please be with.
    >
    > Vahe
    >
    > P.S. My English is not of the best quality, but
    > the network of my friends is international, so
    > I am going to keep the communication in
    > English, but all languages will be welcomed and
    > translated.
    >
    > 2006.10
    >

    Comment


    • Re: notes / comments

      Thursday, October 12, 2006
      ****************************************
      People who say, “It can’t be done,” are either opportunistic cowards or apologists for the status quo. Avoid them. What cancer is to the body, they are to creativity and daring. It is better to fail on your own terms than to succeed on theirs.
      *
      On the day you find your right path, success and failure, greatness and mediocrity, misery and joy will become irrelevant concepts.
      *
      The license of a preacher who does not practice what he preaches should be revoked. To say, “Do as I say, not as I do” is to legitimize abuse.
      *
      To speak of abuse in our environment means to succeed only in uniting the abusers against you.
      *
      Orhan Pamuk was awarded the Nobel Prize for two reasons: (one) in addition to being a good writer, he enjoyed Turkish popular support, and (two) he exposed the lies of Turkish propaganda. You may now guess why so far no Armenian writer has been awarded the Prize.
      *
      If we don’t betray them to the authorities, we beat them up or silence them. For Armenians divide themselves only against their enemies…. If you read the biographies of our greatest writers… What am I saying? There are no biographies of Oshagan or Zarian.
      #
      Friday, October 13, 2006
      *****************************************
      TWO SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT
      *******************************************
      The first says our leaders are our saviors, and the second, they are our dividers and destroyers. If you subscribe to the first school, you are a dupe of our propaganda; if you subscribe to the second, it means you trust the judgment of our writers (from Khorenatsi and Yeghishe in the 5th Century to Massikian and Zarian in the 20th) more than the charlatanism of our wheeler-dealers – sorry, I meant to say, our political leaders, bosses for short.
      *
      LITERATURE AND PROPAGANDA
      ************************************************
      Propaganda is more popular than literature because disoriented people prefer lies that validate their prejudices and fallacies. Those who say Blacks are savages and xxxs are rats will never think of themselves as swine. What Blacks and xxxs are to racists and anti-Semites, Turks are to us. Turks are what binds Armenian to Armenian. They are our glue. Delete Turks from our consciousness and our communities will collapse like a house of cards. Literature is less popular because it exposes contradictions and charlatans who speak with a forked tongue.
      *
      CRITICIZING CRITICS
      ***********************************
      If you are in the business of exposing contradictions, your critics will detect contradictions in everything you say; and if you say you are against A, B, and C, they will accuse you of all three aberrations plus X, Y, and Z.
      *
      ASSUMPTIONS AND AMBITIONS
      *******************************************
      Because we come from a long line of victims, we cannot be victimizers, or so we would like to believe. It is more accurate to say, however, that as perennial victims we think of progress only in terms of how soon we can behave like the opposition, even if it means victimizing our own brothers.
      #
      Saturday, October 14, 2006
      *******************************************
      APOLOGISTS OF THE STATUS QUO
      *******************************************
      Very much like our self-appointed Turcocentric
      pundits, they are a dime a dozen and they come in
      all sizes, shapes, and colors of the rainbow, and
      they operate on the assumption that they know
      things you don’t know because they have sources
      of information available to no one but
      themselves. Even more to the point, unlike you,
      they love and understand their country and fellow
      countrymen. Theirs is therefore a superior brand
      of patriotism. And their reasoning goes something
      like this: our problems are not ours alone; we
      did not invent them; rather they are an integral
      part of the human condition; they will be found
      even in the most prosperous, progressive, and
      developed democracies in the world, including the
      United States of America. Internecine divisions
      and conflicts, corruption in high places,
      catastrophic policy blunders, fraud, mafias, drug
      trafficking, homelessness, unemployment,
      destitution, prostitution…these things have been
      with us since time immemorial and they will
      probably be with us as long as there is life on
      earth.
      *
      What these apologists neglect to tell you is that
      the overwhelming majority of nations around the
      world did not experience six hundred years of
      Ottoman oppression followed by its equally
      nefarious Soviet variant, neither were they
      serial victims of massacres and a genocide which,
      according to the perpetrators and their allies,
      may well be a figment of our imagination.
      *
      True, the majority of uncivilized as well as
      civilized nations have had their share of
      traitors and collaborators with the enemy, but,
      with the possible exception of Ireland, treason
      and betrayal are not an integral part of their
      collective experience and identity.
      *
      All people tend to blame their problems on
      others, but they do not adopt the blame-game as
      their favorite national sport. Furthermore, no
      other nation is experiencing the same high rate
      of alienation, assimilation, and emigration.
      *
      Somewhere Avedik Issahakian (not a dissident or
      critic, but a poet) has said: “We have been
      thrice cursed with earthquakes, bloodthirsty
      neighbors, and brainless leaders.” He should have
      added “and brainwashed apologists and
      opportunistic academics and monomaniacal pundits,
      all of whom enjoy the support of Big Money and
      are united only in stifling criticism and
      dissent.”
      *
      Speaking of Big Money, in this morning’s paper I
      read the following quotation by Jack Welch
      (retired chairman of General Electric): “You are
      the last person to know who the jerks are,
      because they are all putting on a face for you.”
      #

      Comment


      • Re: notes / comments

        Sunday, October 15, 2006
        *******************************************
        NOTES / COMMENTS
        *************************************
        Where the power of the few is dependent on the ignorance of the many, ignorance will be subsidized and knowledge censored.
        *
        To brag is to expose one’s limitations.
        *
        From ideas I disagree with I have a better chance to learn.
        *
        The most important thing that a master can say to his disciple is: “If you think of me as your master, I have taught you nothing.”
        *
        You can’t learn to ride a bike on a mattress.
        *
        There is more wisdom in silence than in speech. Sermons and speeches are delivered by charlatans to an audience of fools.
        *
        You cannot step into the same river twice not because the river has changed but because your perceptions run swifter than the fastest current.
        *
        Overheard on the radio: “A pessimist is a better informed optimist.”
        #
        Monday, October 16, 2006
        *****************************************
        THIS HAS BEEN SAID BEFORE
        *********************************************
        It is said of Confucius that because he was honest he failed in politics. You may now draw your own conclusions.
        *
        Is there anything I can say that hasn’t been said before at least a thousand times by far better men than myself? And I don’t just mean Greek philosophers, Indian mystics, xxxish rabbis, and German metaphysicians, but our own writers.
        *
        “I don’t give a damn about the people,” one of our academics once said to me. “I care only about my children!” What if they grow up to be selfish monsters? I didn’t say that. I too can be diplomatic once in a long while, when I set my mind to it.
        *
        In whatever I write I do not say I am right and you are wrong. What I say and what I have been saying all along is that, since I was wrong most of my life, it is conceivable that in the near or distant future you too may reach the same conclusion. Again, I am not saying or implying this is what will happen. What I am saying is that there is a very remote possibility.
        *
        When you hear someone speaking of tolerance, be careful not to react with violent hostility.
        *
        Diogenes (404-323), Greek philosopher: “The smart slave rules his master.”
        *
        Muhammad (570-632): “Trust in God, but tie your camel.”
        They now trust their camel and tie God. But that’s the way it is with men whenever they try to put theory into practice.
        *
        In YOUR CALL IS IMPORTANT TO US: THE TRUTH ABOUT BULLxxxx by Laura Penny (Toronto, 2005), I read: “Bullxxxx is all about getting away with something, or getting someone to buy something in the broadest possible sense, which means covering arses or kissing them.”
        Crude, my style.
        Further down: “Nobody leaves office because they f***ed up; no, they want to spend more time with their families. No mogul says, I do it all for the money, suckers. They blah-dee-blah on about the company, or some magnificent abstract idea the company embodies.”
        *
        There are poor people because there are wealthy people, in the same way that there are slaves because there are masters. If the wealthy are not ashamed of their wealth it’s because they support publishers, teachers, and preachers all of whom conspire to misrepresent greed as one of the seven cardinal virtues.
        #
        Tuesday, October 17, 2006
        ****************************************
        MORE ON B.S.
        *******************************
        In her book, YOUR CALL IS IMPORTANT TO US: THE TRUTH ABOUT BULLxxxx (Toronto, 2005), Laura Penny speaks about b.s. as if it were a recent development. She ignores the fact that b.s. existed even in the Golden Age of Greece (5th Century B.C.). Socrates lived (and died) exposing it.
        *
        One of Laura Penny’s endnotes reads:
        “Ben Bagdikian has been studying media consolidation since the early 1980s, and his latest book is THE NEW MEDIA MONOPOLY (Beacon Pres, 2004). He has a Web site at http: /www.benbagdikian.com/”
        *
        To the perpetrators, a million deaths is not even a statistic, it is victory. If the Nazis had won, the Holocaust would be remembered today as the ultimate triumph of good over evil.
        *
        When propaganda is confused with knowledge, it becomes worse than ignorance.
        *
        “Is it possible to be a writer in this day and age?” a young poet wants to know. My answer: “If you place survival over literature, choose survival.”
        *
        “Speak truth to power!” Armenian translation: Tell them what they want to hear and if necessary swear on a stack of Bibles.
        *
        With the connivance of the State, organized religions preach truth but practice lies. To put it more bluntly: when two sets of wheeler-dealers conspire, the result will be war and massacre.
        *
        When during an argument I quoted Nikol Aghbalian to a fellow Armenian, he said: “I knew Nikol Aghbalian and I don’t think he was a great man.” Why look for greatness in honesty? Is not honesty in an Armenian greater than greatness?
        #
        Wednesday, October 18, 2006
        **********************************************
        FROM MY NOTEBOOKS
        *************************************
        Whenever I read self-help or how-to books I note that I have been breaking all their rules, which can mean only one thing: I must be doing something right.
        *
        A true disciple surpasses his master because he begins where the master ends.
        *
        The aim of philosophy is to expose b.s., including the b.s. of philosophers.
        *
        Know thyself also means to know that the self is invisible, unpredictable, unprintable, and unknowable.
        *
        A blunder can be either a springboard (if we learn from it) or a cage (if we refuse to acknowledge it).
        *
        A favorite Armenian technique of counter-argument is to be so shamelessly arrogant and brazenly absurd as to reduce the adversary to a pulp of helpless disgust, hopeless despair, and silence.
        *
        “Try to be more like Mark Twain,” I have been advised on more than one occasion. “A touch of humor may make your ideas more palatable to the average reader.” And I can imagine friends advising Mark Twain to be more like Emerson if he wanted to be taken seriously.
        #

        Comment


        • Re: notes / comments

          Thursday, October 19, 2006
          ****************************************
          THE CAPITALIST AND THE PAUPER
          *********************************************
          When warned by his prosperous host not to spit on the floor, Diogenes is said to have spat on the man’s face explaining he could not find a meaner receptacle. I challenge anyone not to love such a man.
          *
          ON STYLE
          ***********************
          If you have a choice between a long paragraph and a brief sentence, choose the sentence. Between a sentence and a single word, choose the word. Between a word of two or more syllables and a monosyllable, choose the latter. Between a monosyllable and silence, why say anything?
          *
          FROM BUNS TO BUGGERS
          *********************************************
          When in his famous Berlin speech Kennedy identified himself as a “Berliner,” he did not know and no one warned him that a “berliner” is a bun, in the same way that a frankfurter is a sausage, a hamburger is a hamburger, and bugger is short for Bulgarian. Now, to say “I am a berliner” may not be as bad as saying “I am a bugger,” but it is in that neighborhood.
          *
          SEMANTICS 101
          *******************************
          There is a difference between smart and smart aleck, and between wise and wisenheimer. We are not smart, we are alecks; neither are we wise, we are heimers.
          *
          ON PROGRESS
          *************************
          We owe progress more to the evolution of the thumb and the invention of zero and less to the so-called greatness and nobility of the human spirit.
          *
          ON BEING OBJECTIVE
          *********************************
          If I have a low opinion of my fellow Armenians, it may be because I have an even lower opinion of my fellow men, myself included.
          *
          MEMO
          ************************
          I write to remind myself, and in reminding myself I hope to remind others that it takes honesty and courage to be objective, and no matter how objective we are we can never be objective enough.
          *
          CONFESSION I
          ************************
          Charlatans are not born but made.
          *
          CONFESSION II
          *****************************
          In my younger days I produced a great deal of chauvinist crapola because as a slum-dweller I was dependent on the charity of swine.
          #
          Friday, October 20, 2006
          ********************************************
          ARMENIANS IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE
          ************************************************
          ON HORESEBACK THROUGH ASIA MINOR by Frederick Burnaby (originally published in 1898, reissued in 2002) contains many references, not all of them flattering, to Armenians – their monasteries, churches, priests, bishops, officials, bazaars, money-lenders, newspapers, schools, women and so on.
          “Armenian women were closely veiled whenever they left the house,” we read here, and: “In many instances, an Armenian was not permitted to see his wife before marriage, and had to take her, as the Yankees say, ‘on spec.’”
          Elsewhere: “An Armenian lady is in no way educated. She is the slave of her husband, and has to do all sorts of menial work for him – wash his feet, rub them dry, and wait at table. From her earliest childhood a girl is brought up to consider herself as a slave in her father’s house. Until Armenians abandon these barbarous customs, their so-called Christianity will not do them much good.”
          *
          In an appendix titled “The Corruption of Armenian Officials,” we are told Armenians are divided into Gregorians, Protestants, and Catholics, and their officials, in addition to being “disgustingly servile,” are as corrupt as their Turkish counterparts.
          To readers who may begin to suspect that the author may have been a Turcophile, I suggest they read Yervant Odian’s realistic novels. But we don’t have to travel back in time to verify Burnaby’s observations. Let us ask instead if anything has changed now that we live in a free and democratic country like the United States.
          *
          On the subject of the Armenian press, Burnaby has this to say: “Armenian newspapers frequently publish news which cannot be agreeable to the Government, and they are not interfered by the authorities.”
          What would happen today if one of our editors were to publish an unflattering article about one of our bosses or benefactors? No need to use our imagination here because when one of our editors did exactly that, he was dragged to court, almost driven out of business on a legal technicality, suffered a stroke, and almost died. A grim reminder of the old French adage, “The more things change, the more they stay the same.”
          *
          Another one of Burnaby’s observation that is worth quoting: “The Armenians who profess the Armenian faith detest any member of their community who has accepted the Roman Catholic or Protestant doctrines, the Christians being much more intolerant than the Turks.”
          *
          About the author we read: “Frederick Gustavus Burnaby was an extraordinary person. Reputed to be the strongest man in the British Army, he was also fluent in seven languages…. He spent five months riding across some of the cruelest winter landscape in the world before hastening home to write this best-seller.”
          *
          Please note that the Index is misleading. The references to Armenians in the text are many more than the number of pages cited in the Index.
          #
          Saturday, October 21, 2006
          ****************************************
          DISAPPOINTMENT
          ***************************
          A surprise call from a gentle reader asking about my health. “I heard you were sick,” he said. When I told him there was nothing wrong with me, he was inconsolable.
          *
          ON SO-CALLED FACTS
          **********************************
          When a man deals only in facts and certainties, you can be sure of one thing: the facts on which his certainties are based have been carefully and cunningly selected, tailored, and doctored.
          *
          SOUND BITES
          ***********************
          In a totalitarian environment to think for oneself can be a capital offense.
          *
          In my youth I never asked myself “Am I right?” because I was always right.
          *
          Turks called us their “most loyal millet.” By loyal they meant subservient or, in the words of an English traveler, “disgustingly servile” – a noteworthy distinction.
          *
          A jackass does not ask himself, “Am I a jackass?” It is the same with charlatans and dupes.
          *
          I try to be objective; therefore I am an enemy of the people.
          *
          Cowards are better equipped at playing it safe than heroes.
          *
          Stanislaw Lec (1909-1966), Polish writer and dissident: “No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible.”
          *
          “The mob shouts with one big mouth and eats with a thousand little ones.”
          #

          Comment


          • Re: notes / comments

            Sunday, October 22, 2006
            *******************************************
            HONESTY: A DEFINITION
            *********************************
            Public relations, political rhetoric, advertisements, and propaganda combine to legitimize bullxxxx and to redefine honesty as “disguised dishonesty.”
            *
            In America you have to advertise even when what you are promoting is a book exposing the damage advertisements inflict on our perception of reality.
            *
            ON TURKS
            ****************************
            The most important issue that unites us today is the Genocide, which also means (in the words of both Chekhov and Sartre, an unlikely pair) that the most lasting bond among people is hatred of the enemy.
            *
            Our hatred of Turks may unite us, but what if this same hatred may make us more like them? Or rather, what we think of them.
            *
            Whenever I speak of Armenian hatred of Turks I am reminded that Armenians don’t hate Turks or anyone else, they only love justice.
            I am willing to concede that whenever I speak of Armenians I have a natural tendency to project; and ever since I was a child I saw Turks the way they are depicted in Armenian cartoons today: fat, mustachioed slobs in shalvars and fez wielding a yataghan dripping with blood – not exactly lovable characters, you might say.
            *
            A VICIOUS CIRCLE
            ***************************
            Bullxxxx is widespread because it works; it works because most men are dupes; and they are dupes because their educational system was designed by bullxxxxters.
            #
            Monday, October 23, 2006
            ********************************************
            FROM MY NOTEBOOKS
            *********************************
            Once, when I asked a fellow Armenian if we are from the same planet,” he replied: “We are not even from the same galaxy.”
            *
            Sometimes understanding a Turkish enemy can be as difficult as understanding an Armenian friend.
            *
            God did not create Armenians in His own image, Turks did.
            *
            Fortune Cookie: “The only rose without a thorn is friendship.”
            *
            We emphasize the positive in us and cover up the negative without realizing that doing so amounts to engaging in deception, which is probably much worse than all our negatives combined.
            *
            If we assume that in every conflict there is right and wrong, or good guys and bad guys, we shall have to conclude that we will have peace in this world only when the good guys doubt their goodness seven times every day.
            *
            I would define a bad guy as a good guy who never questions or doubts his goodness. Certainty is the source of all evil.
            *
            God has visited mankind with countless disasters and catastrophes like floods, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, storms, tsunamis, hurricanes, tornadoes, epidemics, starvation, and son on, but men continue to worship and thank him.
            *
            When reminded of Stalinism or jihadism, defenders of Marxism and Islam will tell you that all systems, including Christianity, have had their share of abusers. But that to me is the best reason why we should question the validity or usefulness of all ideologies and organized religions.
            #
            Tuesday, October 24, 2006
            ************************************************
            BROTHERS, FRIENDS, ENEMIES
            **********************************************
            Dale Carnegie once wrote a best-selling book titled HOW TO WIN FRIENDS AND INFLUENCE PEOPLE. Had he been an Armenian, he would have written a book titled HOW TO SURVIVE YOUR FRIENDS.
            *
            Frederic Raphael on Carnegie’s book: “Probably among the dozen most blandly wicked books ever written.”
            *
            Some day if I ever write my memoirs the shortest chapter in it will be subtitled “My Armenian Friends.”
            *
            George Santayana has said that a friend is someone with whom “we can be most human.” It follows, an enemy is someone we dehumanize.
            *
            Plutarch once defined a brother as someone “who has come out of the same hole.” (How about that for subtle elegance?) One could also define an Armenian as someone whose ancestors were born in a valley or on a mountain somewhere in Transcaucasia two thousand years ago.
            *
            During the last few years I acquired two Turkish friends. At this rate my Turkish friends will outnumber my Armenian friends. To those who think the reason why I am making more Turkish friends and Armenian enemies may be because I am anti-Armenian: I suggest to confuse criticism with hostility is to subscribe to the notion that leaders and their dupes are always right and dissenters always wrong. Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Saddam Hussein, and the Ayatollah subscribed to this notion too.
            *
            Jose Maria Aznar (Spanish diplomat): “Why is it that we must always be apologizing to them and they never? Has anyone ever heard a Muslim apologize for having occupied Spain for eight centuries?”
            *
            If Alexandre Dumas’s three Musketeers had been Armenian, their slogan would have been “Every man for himself!”
            #
            Wednesday, October 25, 2006
            ************************************************
            ON LOVE, HATE, FRIENDS, ENEMIES,
            AND RELATED ATROCITIES
            ************************************************** **
            A true friend is someone who in your absence, when others speak evil of you, does not add his voice to the chorus, and afterwards does not repeat their words to you.
            *
            Friends play a central role in the lives of some, enemies in others.
            *
            If I ever see the light and am born again, I will keep it to myself and let my words and actions speak for themselves.
            *
            Faith tells us not to hate our enemies, and if we can’t manage that, to think of hatred not as a religious or patriotic duty but as a failing and an aberration.
            *
            The word heaven in a religious context is not a place but a dimension, and the dimension is not outside somewhere but (very much like the kingdom of god) within us.
            *
            When a Canadian writer said to a publisher she had written a book about the Armenians, the publisher said: “If it’s about the massacres, we will accept it.” There is no business like shoah business.
            *
            According to an American pundit in this morning’s paper: “Far too many people have already been killed for Bush and his advisers to admit that their ‘war of choice’ was all a mistake.” True. The bigger the mistake, the harder it is to admit it. If you step on someone’s toes in a crowded place you can say “Sorry!” and get away with it. But what can you possibly say for killing two million innocent civilians except “I didn’t do it!”
            *
            A cartoon by Bouchard depicting a slave in the middle of a Roman orgy declaring: “Someday we will all be equal and everyone will have his own slaves.”
            #

            Comment


            • Re: notes / comments

              Thursday, October 26, 2006
              *****************************
              DIARY
              **********************
              Paul Johnson on Brahms’s Intermezzo in B flat minor: “I have a beautiful recording of it by the Turkish pianist Idil Biret, a pupil of Cortot…”
              My first thought: Biret must be either Armenian or half-Armenian. Once a chauvinist, always a chauvinist.
              Even when one’s mind adopts an anti-chauvinist stance, one’s gut remains chauvinist.
              *
              It never pays to examine too closely a man’s ancestry. If he identifies himself as a Patagonian, a Hottentot, or a Mongol, we should take his word for it. Speaking for myself, you may simply identify me as a human being.
              *
              Socrates said, “Of the gods we know nothing.” But if you read the Bible from beginning to end you will reach the exact opposite conclusion: Of God we know everything and then some!
              *
              Memo to an Armenian writer:
              If you have more than two or at most three fans, you must be doing something wrong.
              #
              Friday, October 27, 2006
              *****************************************
              ARMENIAN INTELLECTUALS
              ***************************************
              During the Soviet era I wrote about twenty letters to writers in the Homeland asking if I could interview them. Only one of them replied suggesting I write a letter of congratulations on the 25th anniversary of the magazine he was then editing. I had never seen or heard about his magazine but I wrote a brief cliché-ridden paragraph, which he promptly published, and that was the only thing by me that ever saw the light in Soviet Armenia.
              *
              Last summer I was interviewed by e-mail by an Armenian editor in Moscow. When he disagreed with my answers, he sent follow-up question with whose answers he also disagreed. This routine was repeated a few more times. When the interview finally appeared, it bore the following Pinteresque title: “Interview with an Armenian Dissident: Incomprehensible Answers to Misunderstood Questions.”
              *
              Long before I met Vahé Oshagan I was told he was, like his illustrious father, partial to blunt talk, especially when dealing with lesser writers in no position to retaliate. So when I found myself seated beside him at a banquet in an Armenian community center, I told him in no uncertain terms what I thought of his poetry, which was not one hell of a lot; to which he said: “You and I have nothing further to say to each other.” When I got up to leave, I heard him say: “Not so fast, my friend!”
              Did he get even? I no longer remember. But he did say I was wasting my time translating a phony like Zarian, and if I wanted to make myself useful I should get busy translating such worthy and authentic writers as his father.
              Shortly thereafter mutual friends informed me that Vahé Oshagan’s opinion of me was so low that it could not be quoted or even paraphrased in polite society. Strange as this may seem to some readers, this development flattered my vanity instead of offending my ego.
              #

              Saturday, October 28, 2006
              ******************************************
              THEORY AND PRACTICE
              *********************************
              Theory: Since you and I are Armenian, we must be brothers.
              Practice: Since you and I belong to different tribes, we cannot even begin to communicate with each other.
              *
              ENIGMA
              ***************************
              Being wrong I understand. What I don’t understand, and I doubt if I ever will, is being catastrophically wrong with total unawareness, like the good citizens of Athens who condemned Socrates to death with the unshakable conviction that they were discharging their patriotic duty.
              *
              TRANSLATION
              ************************
              Perhaps a modern translation of the commandment “Love your enemy” is “Humanize yourself.”
              *
              HOW TO READ
              ****************************
              When I don’t understand a sentence or a paragraph I seldom reread it because (a) I lose interest in a writer or translator who makes no effort to make himself accessible to the general reader, and (b) the certainty that someday I will read the same idea in another context more clearly expressed.
              *
              If an idea is good, it will be remembered, rephrased, and repeated an infinite number of times.
              *
              TO KNOW IS TO REMEMBER
              ****************************************
              All so-called new or original ideas are as old as mankind. The meaning of the word “original” is going back to the origins. We sometimes forget that when we speak of the history of ideas, what we mean is written ideas. For thousands of years men could not write. That does not mean they did not think.
              #

              Comment


              • Re: notes / comments

                Sunday, October 29, 2006
                ****************************************
                IF THE SHOE FITS…
                ********************************
                Whenever I feel mean, unforgiving, and full of venom, I ascribe it to my Ottoman heritage.
                *
                A false friend can be more dangerous than a mortal enemy. That’s because a false friend knows where your Achilles’ heel is and he strikes when you least expect it.
                *
                A false friend is one who escalates a minor disagreement to terminal hatred and verbal slaughter.
                *
                My false friends outnumber my enemies because being naïve and gullible (dumb for short) I have been brainwashed to believe I am smart and can’t be taken in.
                *
                I have said and repeated that I am smart so often that I now have no doubts on that score.
                *
                My position is so vulnerable and my weaknesses so many that no matter how absurd the flattery, I swallow it hook, line, and sinker.
                *
                Because I consider all defeats moral victories, I am invincible. Or, as they say in diplomatic circles in Washington: “Whichever way the xxxx goes down, my ass is covered.”
                #
                Monday, October 30, 2006
                ********************************************
                ON OBJECTIVITY
                *******************************
                Objectivity is like common sense, even fanatics don’t complain that they don’t have enough of it. But the truth of the matter is, we either underestimate or overestimate people, including ourselves. The aim of racism is to legitimize this widely practiced aberration.
                As a child I was brought up to underestimate Turks to such a degree that I could not conceive of a day when I would read such oxymoronic phrases as “a great Turkish pianist,” or “a widely translated Turkish novelist and winner of the Nobel Prize who has been compared to Thomas Mann.”
                To the same degree that I underestimated Turks I overestimated my fellow Armenians. When I finally realized that Armenians were human beings, like the rest of mankind, with their share, perhaps even more than their share, of failings, I experienced a state of shock that lasted several years during which I came close to becoming an alcoholic.
                If I am too critical of Armenians today and not critical enough of Turks, it is because I don’t know and I will never know everything there is to know about them, or for that matter about myself.
                Historians like Toynbee and philosophers like Sartre tell us it is impossible to know everything about the past, and history is not a story with a fixed plot but a narrative that must be constantly updated and rewritten.
                As human beings we are therefore condemned to pronounce verdict only on partial and sometimes even hearsay evidence.
                To rely on a politician’s version of the past is like assuming the roles of judge and jury and relying on the evidence presented by a single lawyer whose aim is not to prove the innocence of his client but to challenge the prosecution to dispel all doubt as to the guilt of the accused.
                When an Armenian poet said, “Human justice, I spit on your face,” and long before him, when xxxxens has one of his characters say, “The law is a ass!” they were emphasizing this very same point and the impossibility of achieving objectivity and impartiality.
                Historians, even honest and well-meaning ones, are human beings like the rest of us: they may know better about some things, perhaps even many things, but they don’t know everything. We should trust their judgment on big things as much as we trust ours on little things.
                Only almighty and all-knowing god may be objective, but as far as I know the word isn’t even mentioned in the Bible, where we are asked not to judge our enemies but to love them.
                #
                Tuesday, October 31, 2006
                ***************************************
                PHYSICAL AND METAPHYSICAL REFLECTIONS
                ************************************************** *
                God created the universe in his own image. Astronomers tell us there are many more stars in heaven than grains of sand on earth. And now, consider the fact that the earth isn’t even a star but a planet, and relatively speaking, about the size of only an almost invisible fraction of a dust particle. Need I say more?
                *
                MORE ON RACISM
                ***************************
                In a fable by La Fontaine titled “The Wolf and the Lamb,” the wolf accuses the lamb of having spoken ill of him last year. When the lamb says he wasn’t even born last year, the wolf replies, “It must have been your brother.”
                *
                TURKISH PIANISTS
                *****************************
                I asked a professor of music if he had ever heard of a famous Turkish pianist. “Two of them,” he replied to my racist astonishment. “Is one of them good with Brahms?” I asked next. “His recording of the Intermezzi is famous,” he said after naming him.
                *
                As an Armenian I began to make sense of things only on the day I realized that some Turks may indeed be horrid (Turks may agree with me on this) but our own “betters” are not as good as we think they are (I don’t expect Armenians, especially our “betters,” to agree with me).
                #
                20TH-CENTURY ARMENIAN LITERATURE
                ***********************************************
                A MOTHER’S HEART
                ********************************
                By AVEDIK ISSAHAKIAN
                ************************************
                There is an old tale
                About a boy
                An only son
                Who fell in love with a lass.
                *
                “You don’t love me,
                You never did,” said she to him.
                “But if you do, go then
                And fetch me your mother’s heart.”
                *
                Downcast and distraught
                The boy walked off
                And after shedding copious tears
                Came back to his love.
                *
                The girl was angry
                When she saw him thus
                And said, “Don’t you dare come back again
                Without your mother’s heart.”
                *
                The boy went and killed
                A mountain roe deer
                And offered its heart
                To the one he adored.
                *
                But again she was angry
                And said, “Get out of my sight.
                I told you what I want
                Is your mother’s heart.”
                *
                The boy went and killed
                His mother, and as he ran
                With her heart in his hand
                He slipped and fell.
                *
                “My dear child,
                My poor child,”
                Cried the mother’s heart,
                “Did you hurt yourself?”
                *
                (Translated by Ara Baliozian)
                #
                Wednesday, November 01, 2006
                *****************************************
                EXPOSING LIES
                *****************************
                A politician is a politician regardless of nationality, and as a politician he shares more things in common with other politicians than with his own people.
                *
                The one endeavor in which politicians excel is making wrong appear right. In his last days, Hitler blamed not himself but the German people. Since they had failed to live up to his expectations, he is quoted as having said, they deserved to be wiped off the map.
                *
                We live in a world where the credibility of lies is greater than that of truth, hence the popularity of organized religions and ideologies. I am not saying all ideologies and religions are wrong. It is ideologues and religious leaders who say that. It is popes and ayatollahs, bishops and mullahs who say if you don’t trust the salvation of your soul into their hands, you are no better than a heretic and an infidel dog and will burn in hell for eternity.
                Since at all times and everywhere heretics and infidels have outnumbered true believers, there must be more people in hell than anywhere else.
                *
                If you say I repeat myself, I will make a deal with you: on the day a preacher says he is no longer against sin, I will consider changing my tune.
                *
                I think it was Aldous Huxley who once observed that the earth is the insane asylum of other planets. That makes more sense to me than the idea of a compassionate and loving god being guilty of the greatest holocaust (i.e. hell) in the history of the universe.
                *
                Exposing lies can be a catastrophic career move.
                #

                Comment


                • Re: notes / comments

                  Originally posted by arabaliozian
                  ON OBJECTIVITY
                  *******************************
                  But the truth of the matter is, we either underestimate or overestimate people, including ourselves. The aim of racism is to legitimize this widely practiced aberration.
                  As a child I was brought up to underestimate Turks to such a degree that I could not conceive of a day when I would read such oxymoronic phrases as “a great Turkish pianist,” or “a widely translated Turkish novelist and winner of the Nobel Prize who has been compared to Thomas Mann.”
                  To the same degree that I underestimated Turks I overestimated my fellow Armenians. When I finally realized that Armenians were human beings, like the rest of mankind, with their share, perhaps even more than their share, of failings, I experienced a state of shock that lasted several years during which I came close to becoming an alcoholic.
                  At long last I have some time to spare to comment on your piece here. I understand your position here, and the need for critique of regimes of thought, even our own.

                  However, while I see that, I disagree (again) with your message. The message behind the cliche of racism is too beaten to death in modernity. It's such an abundant pastime to argue against racism, that the value in being a critic of such things is pretty much zero. Everyone and there mom is a possessor of this little kernel of truth and they call it wisdom. "Don't be racist, it's bad, mmkay?" It seems that it is only arrived with the lightest simplicity. Sure, we are taught to respect people, and treat people like humans, but how and when did we go from one to the other?

                  The problem I find with the meat of your position, and those likeminded is that, while racism in its most extreme forms is bad (I would not call it racism but simple acts of violence or destruction whatever humans do that is extreme), there is a healthy facet about "racism" (again I am using a word you have chosen, and word that was chosen by egalitarians and propagandists to label others who might subscribe to "old world views" or views that are contrarian from theirs) which you and those like you ignore. To you, it is either an all-or-nothing deal.

                  In this little simple Disney version of things, you either underestimate, disrespect, belittle, or marginalize everyone in a group from which you seek to distinguish thyself or you are not racist and you treat everyone equally (nevermind the absurdity in that). Or so the logic goes. In effect, it marginalizes, belittles and dismisses all those who may or may not hold opposing views as crackpots and people not even worth of discussion or time.

                  In my case, I happen to favor Armenians over Turks. Is that racist? Problably so in the minds of many. Turks are people who tried to commit genocide against my people. I have no reason to like them. Sure there might be one or two goods one in there, but when have I denied that? Furthermore, when have humans defined anything by the exceptions? It is the rules that define, the generalities the things that are most evident and visible and the patterns that stand out. Most Turks deny what they did, and although the current generation has no direct connection, they have an indirect connection to the blood on their hands. That is enough for me, and if I choose to dislike them, that is my prerogative. As bad as the Armenians are on my side of the fence, the grass always seems greener on the other side, so who cares? You may, but I don't. I also do not like blacks that much, and choose to dissociate myself from them and associate as little as possible with them. I have all the reasons, which will never be good for those who trumpet the party line. However, they are my reasons and all I need is reasons for why I do or do not want to do a certain thing or like a certain person or hold a certian position. I have studied African-American history, and African-American political thought. I can probably sit here and tell you more about W.E.B. DuBois, the veil and double-consciousness more than your average black rapper, so that in effect proves that being racist is not a result of ignorance or some other claptrap yuppies, hippies and other egalitarians like to believe. My point is, there are rhymes and reasons for everything, and until you investigate the reasons, it is shortsighted to dismiss the conclusions and one ends up doing the same exact thing they initially set to out to speak against.

                  You then cite historians to support your claim about history as a narrative and the lack of objectivity, all things which I agree with. However, historians like Toynbee, and those historians of his generation and before, were all conscious of the the thing we are all supposed to be unconscious of and pretend doesn't exist - race. And to some degree, their historiography is only a product of the times they were from. Thus, them being conscious of race was in fact evident in their historigraphy and the differences they attributed to and between peoples and civilizations which they recognized and even attributed to the changes that occurred. I say historians of that generation, because modern historians (court historians) are all the same. There is no more originality and genuineness in historiagraphy in this age, aside from trumpeting the same bullshyt line of the established religion of sameness and égalité, hacks like Jared Diamond, who are not historians but like to pretend they are an authority.
                  Last edited by Anonymouse; 11-01-2006, 08:01 PM.
                  Achkerov kute.

                  Comment


                  • Re: notes / comments

                    so your saying don't be "racist" to the people branded as "racist" by the PC crowd? I'll buy that. I am just curious why you posted such a lengthy and well thought out response to him. I got the impression he rather enjoys the role of the misunderstood yet enlightened Armenian critic.

                    Originally posted by Anonymouse
                    At long last I have some time to spare to comment on your piece here. I understand your position here, and the need for critique of regimes of thought, even our own.

                    However, while I see that, I disagree (again) with your message. The message behind the cliche of racism is too beaten to death in modernity. It's such an abundant pastime to argue against racism, that the value in being a critic of such things is pretty much zero. Everyone and there mom is a possessor of this little kernel of truth and they call it wisdom. "Don't be racist, it's bad, mmkay?" It seems that it is only arrived with the lightest simplicity. Sure, we are taught to respect people, and treat people like humans, but how and when did we go from one to the other?

                    The problem I find with the meat of your position, and those likeminded is that, while racism in its most extreme forms is bad (I would not call it racism but simple acts of violence or destruction whatever humans do that is extreme), there is a healthy facet about "racism" (again I am using a word you have chosen, and word that was chosen by egalitarians and propagandists to label others who might subscribe to "old world views" or views that are contrarian from theirs) which you and those like you ignore. To you, it is either an all-or-nothing deal.

                    In this little simple Disney version of things, you either underestimate, disrespect, belittle, or marginalize everyone in a group from which you seek to distinguish thyself or you are not racist and you treat everyone equally (nevermind the absurdity in that). Or so the logic goes. In effect, it marginalizes, belittles and dismisses all those who may or may not hold opposing views as crackpots and people not even worth of discussion or time.

                    In my case, I happen to favor Armenians over Turks. Is that racist? Problably so in the minds of many. Turks are people who tried to commit genocide against my people. I have no reason to like them. Sure there might be one or two goods one in there, but when have I denied that? Furthermore, when have humans defined anything by the exceptions? It is the rules that define, the generalities the things that are most evident and visible and the patterns that stand out. Most Turks deny what they did, and although the current generation has no direct connection, they have an indirect connection to the blood on their hands. That is enough for me, and if I choose to dislike them, that is my prerogative. As bad as the Armenians are on my side of the fence, the grass always seems greener on the other side, so who cares? You may, but I don't. I also like do not like blacks that much, and choose to dissociate myself from them and associate as little as possible with them. I have all the reasons, which will never be good for those who trumpet the party line. However, they are my reasons and all I need is reasons for why I do or do not want to do a certain thing or like a certain person or hold a certian position. I have studied African-American history, and African-American political thought. I can probably sit here and tell you more about W.E.B. DuBois, the veil and double-consciousness more than your average black rapper, so that in effect proves that being racist is not a result of ignorance or some other claptrap yuppies, hippies and other egalitarians like to believe. My point is, there are rhymes and reasons for everything, and until you investigate the reasons, it is shortsighted to dismiss the conclusions and one ends up doing the same exact thing they initially set to out to speak against.

                    You then cite historians to support your claim about history as a narrative and the lack of objectivity, all things which I agree with. However, historians like Toynbee, and those historians of his generation and before, were all conscious of the the thing we are all supposed to be unconscious of and pretend doesn't exist - race. And to some degree, their historiography is only a product of the times they were from. Thus, them being conscious of race was in fact evident in their historigraphy and the differences they attributed to and between peoples and civilizations which they recognized and even attributed to the changes that occurred. I say historians of that generation, because modern historians (court historians) are all the same. There is no more originality and genuineness in historiagraphy in this age, aside from trumpeting the same bullshyt line of the established religion of sameness and égalité, hacks like Jared Diamond, who are not historians but like to pretend they are an authority.

                    Comment


                    • Re: notes / comments

                      Originally posted by gmd
                      so your saying don't be "racist" to the people branded as "racist" by the PC crowd? I'll buy that. I am just curious why you posted such a lengthy and well thought out response to him. I got the impression he rather enjoys the role of the misunderstood yet enlightened Armenian critic.
                      The reason I posted has nothing to do with what he enjoys but with the amount I have to say. What he enjoys has no bearing, for everyone desires distinction and feels the need for some ennobling objective in life.
                      Achkerov kute.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X