In the climatic parts of the book " The Da Vinci Code" I have come to notice a simple flaw in the whole idea of this message, and the flaw is admitted to by the research done by Dan Brown himself (the author of the book).. though this book is filed under "non-fiction" it has many pieces of accurate information.. but not all of it is.. so it cannot be non-fiction. here is one simple flaw I have time for now to discuss..
The research done on the painting of the last supper portrait reveals a woman being on the right side of Jesus, and that woman apparently was not there in the post 1954 era.. why>? well the book states that "many of the photographs of the artwork were taken before 1954 when the details were still hidden under layers of grime and several 'restorative' repainting done by clumsy painters...now finally it has been cleaned down to Da Vinci’s original layer of paint and restored".. now this makes me ponder the thought of the painting in fact being impaired in its originality to impose these images to further make falsifying claims against Christianity, and show that Jesus is not a divine being, which would make non-Christians the happiest people on earth, and make it simple to show that Da Vinci has "hidden" messages.. this is a very suspicious account.. Which is why the media has not indulged itself into this matter.. it stands with to much contradiction and questions asked and answered in to many coincidental occasions...
What u all think..?
The research done on the painting of the last supper portrait reveals a woman being on the right side of Jesus, and that woman apparently was not there in the post 1954 era.. why>? well the book states that "many of the photographs of the artwork were taken before 1954 when the details were still hidden under layers of grime and several 'restorative' repainting done by clumsy painters...now finally it has been cleaned down to Da Vinci’s original layer of paint and restored".. now this makes me ponder the thought of the painting in fact being impaired in its originality to impose these images to further make falsifying claims against Christianity, and show that Jesus is not a divine being, which would make non-Christians the happiest people on earth, and make it simple to show that Da Vinci has "hidden" messages.. this is a very suspicious account.. Which is why the media has not indulged itself into this matter.. it stands with to much contradiction and questions asked and answered in to many coincidental occasions...
What u all think..?
Comment