Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Einstein

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Anonymouse

    "Charlatan."

    "What is 'charlatan'?"



    "A quack."



    "I don't have feathers!"

    Comment


    • #52
      Looks like at least Einstein OWNED Oppenheimer in Princeton.
      this post = teh win.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Stark Evade
        And only his name is commonly associated with STR which is unfair and misleading because so much work was done before him, including all of the math involved.
        That's not entirely true, as the equations most commonly associated with SR are the Lorentz Transformations. You're probably right that the larger, non-scientific world credits Einstein almost exclusively, but people that actually work in the field seem to realize that Einstein is responsible for none of the nuts and bolts of the theory. His contribution was the famous gedankens that demonstrate how the transformations can be explained as a relativistic effect, rather than as an ether effect. In that sense, he is responsible for SR, as he was the first to realize that the mathematical and experimental results were due to relativity.

        Realistically, I don't think he was stupid. But when it comes to scientists, I also don't think he's as special as he's made out to be either.
        I'd actually imagine that he probably wouldn't disagree with you there. Einstein wasn't much of a mathematician and he did little to no experimentation. He was, however, a great theoretician. Perhaps the fact that he wasn't too involved with developing the small cogs in the system is what allowed him to see the big picture better than anyone else could.

        Also, I really think he has been as popularized as he has been simply because he is a figure that the common man can identify with. He struggled with math, worked at a patent office, and came up with a large theoretical breakthrough seemingly just by thinking about it. Dan Dennett gives a decent description of this in one of his papers:

        Chalmers would like to fulfil the Philosopher’s Dream:

        To prove a priori, from one’s ivory tower, a metaphysical fact that forces a revolution in the sciences.

        It is not an impossible dream. (That is, it is not logically impossible.) Einstein’s great insight into relativity comes tantalizingly close to having been a purely philosophical argument, something a philosopher might have come up with just from first principles.
        Tufts University is a world-class private research university in Greater Boston that provides an education like no other.


        When people look at the work of Hilbert and Poincare and Lorentz, they see incomprehensible physical minutiae and post-graduate level mathematics. Einstein's publications, at least the ones on SR, are simply more accessible. The layman can read them and say "hey, that makes sense."

        Comment


        • #54
          Nice input Louseyourname and thanks for the links. I enjoyed the thread in the physics forum particularly. And as I knew/figured - many contributed (to relativity - general and special) - and Einstein wasn't so much a great mathmatician perhaps - but at least he understood the signifigance of some seemingly disconected findings and had the insight to apply them and to communicate the concepts - a very important and often underappreciated skill - and the fact that he is recognized both in the physics community, the noblel committe and society in general certainly says something for his contributiions. So OK perhaps he did not give the credit that his predecessors and discoverers of specific formula and principals deserved....shame on him...but really now...

          Comment


          • #55
            Well, I just spotted another good thread on Einstein over at the Physics Forums.

            I'm heading to this year's Nobel Conference in Minnesota. The topic is the Legacy of Einstein and the panels will consist of scientists in the areas of statistical physics, relativity, cosmology, and unified theories, who will discuss current work in the areas of Einstein's greatest...


            One of the posters there was invited to a lecture at the nobel presentation this year, and one of the topics was Einstein's legacy. This lecture seems to have focused mostly on one of his lesser-known contributions, in the area of condensed matter physics. The linked thread contains one man's notes from that lecture.

            Comment

            Working...
            X