Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Social constuction of reality and history

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Re: Social constuction of reality and history

    Originally posted by Anonymouse
    It looks like the post-modernists dug themselves in a grave....

    Rationalism, or what we call modernity (since rationalism is the touchstone of modernity), believes in nothing...

    Belief in anything, in other words, is the opposite of rationalism...

    A conventional army cannot defeat and historically has always had difficulty defeating decentralized enemies...

    And hence, spreading Western "values" and "Democracy" to a people and a culture with a different mentality and belief system, is a fools game.
    You manage to pack so much into your posts (even though sometimes sometimes you contradict yourself from prior posts... that's perfectly fine, though.)

    I'd agree with some of this, like I mentioned before. Hardcore rationalists (objecting to irrational--that they define) place themselves in a weird intellectual corner. (Non-extreme) rationalism doesn't need to translate to 'believe in nothing.' If ideas are a pendulum, the highest point on each swing is a point. Some people see things in terms of only those two points (black and white). Other people see a continuum (shades of grey). I actually conceptualize knowledge in a sphere, not evem a line (but that's much more than this topic).

    Today I saw that a woman shouted at Bush and China's leader. Something like, "Bush, stop China from persecuting the Falun Gong." China has (since 1999) sought to oppress this group--because they were able to organize the largest peaceful, decentralized 'democratic' protest in China since Tieneman (sp?) Square. That also gets at the 'democracy' word-meaning differences.

    Comment


    • #22
      Re: Social constuction of reality and history

      Originally posted by Anahita
      You manage to pack so much into your posts (even though sometimes sometimes you contradict yourself from prior posts... that's perfectly fine, though.)
      How do I contradict myself? Please point it out. Furthermore, what is wrong with contradictions? Contradictions only exist where one views through the prism of logic. The world is understood in terms of flux as opposed to something fixed. And where there are many perspectives there cannot be contradictions. I wouldn't call a contradiction so much as a defect, but a virtue! After all, does such a person learn less of truth?
      Achkerov kute.

      Comment


      • #23
        Re: Social constuction of reality and history

        I agree. There isn't anything 'wrong' with contradictions (or what SEEM like those at first glace), Anonymouse. And I'd also agree that contradictions exist through the prism of logic (nice wording, btw.)

        I once wrote a great paper for an honors course on logic and rationality. My teacher gave me an F (and I'm a straight A student!) LOL. The paper was perfect. She was too damn stubborn to consider something new (outside of what she taught and wanted regurgitated back in term-paper format.) I answered all the questions, as asked and also incorporated relevant text. She was nuts (in my HO), but since that paper wouldn’t hurt me, I left her to gloat in her ignorance. Her loss.

        Comment


        • #24
          Re: Social constuction of reality and history

          Originally posted by Anahita
          I agree. There isn't anything 'wrong' with contradictions (or what SEEM like those at first glace), Anonymouse. And I'd also agree that contradictions exist through the prism of logic (nice wording, btw.)

          I once wrote a great paper for an honors course on logic and rationality. My teacher gave me an F (and I'm a straight A student!) LOL. The paper was perfect. She was too damn stubborn to consider something new (outside of what she taught and wanted regurgitated back in term-paper format.) I answered all the questions, as asked and also incorporated relevant text. She was nuts (in my HO), but since that paper wouldn’t hurt me, I left her to gloat in her ignorance. Her loss.
          As you can see, here you have first hand evidence of how your professor, like the many great patrons of rationalism, behaving in an irrational manner! Haha, don't you love irony?
          Achkerov kute.

          Comment


          • #25
            Re: Social constuction of reality and history

            Originally posted by Anahita
            I understand. History is all about storytelling around a set of facts. You and I might have identical facts, but come up with very different narratives based on those. e.g., Did Columbus ‘discover’ or ‘invade’ the Americas?

            There is an objective reality. People do not have direct access to that reality, though. Everything anyone sees and thinks is filtered through experience, words, prior knowledge, and so on. There is no such thing as an observer-free observation (and all observers have different kinds and levels of bias.)
            Oh great. This discussion again.

            There are facts. You can say person A hit person B. What you don't have access to is why. Problem with history or journalism is that what's reported doesn't stop there. Speculations as to the unknown circumstances are thrown in.

            As for science. Yeah, it's true enough that we can't be completely unbiased in many situations, but that doesn't mean that our work is worthless and that doesn't mean that we should abandon our attempts to be objective and unbiased.
            [COLOR=#4b0082][B][SIZE=4][FONT=trebuchet ms]“If you think you can, or you can’t, you’re right.”
            -Henry Ford[/FONT][/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]

            Comment

            Working...
            X