Re: Getting hit on by Turks? Date them?
Yes, we know history Tommy Boy. No one advocated purity. This is a red-herring.
You seem to forget that whatever mixing that has occurred in history prior to the 1960s when the age of empires was pretty much over,and the rise of the third world and civil rights of all colored peoples was en vogue, mixing was always localized.
The problem with your philosophy is it encourages the mentality of, give them an inch and they will take miles. You are either for the miscegenation of our common folk with every genotype or you are not. And if you are, then the ramification and the logical consequence of it in the end if taken to its extreme is a complete mud looking people with Asian eyes, a black nose, or what have you.
Even my grandparents who existed in the world before political correctness and the rise of diversity, identified otars as otars, asians as asians and blacks as blacks, in the funny word, "sevamort."
Originally posted by TomServo
View Post
You seem to forget that whatever mixing that has occurred in history prior to the 1960s when the age of empires was pretty much over,and the rise of the third world and civil rights of all colored peoples was en vogue, mixing was always localized.
The problem with your philosophy is it encourages the mentality of, give them an inch and they will take miles. You are either for the miscegenation of our common folk with every genotype or you are not. And if you are, then the ramification and the logical consequence of it in the end if taken to its extreme is a complete mud looking people with Asian eyes, a black nose, or what have you.
Even my grandparents who existed in the world before political correctness and the rise of diversity, identified otars as otars, asians as asians and blacks as blacks, in the funny word, "sevamort."
Comment