Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Virgin or Non-Virgin

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ara87
    replied
    Re: Virgin or Non-Virgin

    One order of non virgin please! unless of course the one just happens to be a virgin. But seriously i don't know how those suicide bombers get brainwashed with the idea of seventy virgins. Seriously 70 virgins, Imagine you and 70 virgins going at it 1 at a time maybe even 2 and each time you have to teach them everything you know and what to do, i prefer some experience.

    Leave a comment:


  • freakyfreaky
    replied
    Re: Virgin or Non-Virgin

    When sex is good, its 5% of the relationship; when sex is bad, its 95% of the relationship.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anoush
    replied
    Re: Virgin or Non-Virgin

    Originally posted by Tres Bien View Post
    I dont think you can demand from everyone too get married. Not everyone are suited to get married...or would make good mothers or wives...that goes for men too(especially) . But you're really talking about woman and not men. If you want to save yourself for your husband that is one thing, but why degenerate others that don't or dont want to? You say that it will give they man something harder to work for, what you're doing is they completly opposite, acting like a xxxxx. Do you think there is nothing more in this world that is more important that it can give you, then sex? You are limiting yourself to just that.
    Of course I don't expect everyone to get married; but we were discussing here in the heterosexual kind and to the fact that most people would still prefer to get married; have their own child/children and form a family like our parents. Some wouldn't, I wasn't talking about them and yes I was mostly talking about women's sexual behaviours. This is my own standards and morals; everyone is free to speak their mind and I don't think I can persuade anyone to do anything they are going to do it differently anyways. People's standards in comparison within the past 50 plus years have subsided and the mores and ethics have changed dramatically to be much looser. I think that when Armenian men decide to marry an 'odar' woman they set different standards than if they would marry an Armenian woman. In other words, they become more stricter and more demanding with Armenian women than with 'odar' women. It's not just me saying the above about holding out for sex; but it's a known factor that the longer a woman holds out for sex the more interesting she becomes and she would hold his interest longer if she plays her cards right.

    And yes, of course I know that there is more to a relationship than sex; but read the heading of this thread which states to be "Virgin or Non-Virgin". It's all about sex. Frankly in a good and a healthy relationship; sex and intimacy are very important and it is the bond between a man and a woman.
    Last edited by Anoush; 08-26-2008, 05:14 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tres Bien
    replied
    Re: Virgin or Non-Virgin

    I dont think you can demand from everyone too get married. Not everyone are suited to get married...or would make good mothers or wives...that goes for men too(especially) . But you're really talking about woman and not men. If you want to save yourself for your husband that is one thing, but why degenerate others that don't or dont want to? You say that it will give they man something harder to work for, what you're doing is they completly opposite, acting like a xxxxx. Do you think there is nothing more in this world more important that it can give you, then sex? You are limiting yourself to just that (edit: into only beeing a sex object).
    Last edited by Tres Bien; 08-27-2008, 10:55 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anoush
    replied
    Re: Virgin or Non-Virgin

    I guess you could call me old fashioned; but I don't agree for a woman to have sexual relations before marriage. I just don't think that it's good moral standards and I don't think Armenian men in general would appreciate or would like loose women. Also, generally men would like to fight their way through to find out the sexuality of a woman and how she would be in bed; and the minute a woman gives herself away completely, usually the yearning and all the work for the man to get there starts subsiding. I think the longer a woman keeps her sexuality under covers the more alluring she would be for the man and it'll give him something hard to work for.
    Last edited by Anoush; 08-26-2008, 03:29 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • jgk3
    replied
    Re: Virgin or Non-Virgin

    I somehow get the feeling that in order for a guy to be cool with a girl he's with who has been with even 20+ men, he would've needed to have gone through quite a few women himself and experienced sex in a way other than just as the glue for a relationship. He'd probably have become more comfortable with the idea of women having sex with as many people as he has along the way too, otherwise he probably would not have gotten sex with that many people to begin with (unless he's some kind of privileged member of a very misogynous society).

    Leave a comment:


  • LadySilver
    replied
    Re: Virgin or Non-Virgin

    How rare is it to find a woman who has been with 100 men, I wasn't talking extremes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anonymouse
    replied
    Re: Virgin or Non-Virgin

    Originally posted by LadySilver View Post
    I don't think so.
    99% of straight men would be to differ. Close to a hundred men? Come on, that's a woman of loose morals.

    Leave a comment:


  • LadySilver
    replied
    Re: Virgin or Non-Virgin

    I don't think so.

    Leave a comment:


  • yerazhishda
    replied
    Re: Virgin or Non-Virgin

    Originally posted by LadySilver View Post
    If you fall in love with a woman who has had sexual relations with another man would you completely throw away the relationship just because of it?
    Sexuality of a woman doesn't define her.
    It does when you have a woman who has slept with hundreds of men.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X