Where is your first love...?

[PASAMONSTER]

thats the main reason for separations

when you thikn about it all the other little xxxx that we make up as reasons are really because there isnt enough love anymore.

exept for frenchie's reason. my respects frenchie. I had a friend who's fiance got killed in an accident, the same way, exept this was on Valentines Day. about 2 years ago.

ehhhhhh. oxormi antsialnerin.

[loseyourname]

Originally posted by Anonymouse That all depends on how you define "first love".

Do you have your little primer with you? Read carefully now. THE FIRST PERSON YOU EVER FELL IN LOVE WITH, IF INDEED THERE EXISTS SUCH A PERSON.

[loseyourname]

Originally posted by sleuth Thanks guys for your respond...loseyourname and withlotus i have questions for both of you...

what do you think ...

we all separated with our loved once because of fait or love wasnt enough...
i have tend to belive that lack of love is the main reason of separations..
Its just hard to admit ....

Love was plentiful, perhaps too much so. Like I said, she was a very jealous and possessive person, and I'm a big flirt with a mean independence streak. As much as we loved each other, and heck, still do, it was just too difficult to overcome that very fundamental incompatibility.

[Anonymouse]

Originally posted by loseyourname Do you have your little primer with you? Read carefully now. THE FIRST PERSON YOU EVER FELL IN LOVE WITH, IF INDEED THERE EXISTS SUCH A PERSON.

Well, since now we have a definition, I can answer.

I don't know if I've fallen in "love" since I define "love" more than infatuation, so by the standard of a relationship, I've never had one, but the first person I probably fell infatuated for, not just physically, I don't know how far back in the memory hole I can go, perhaps all the way back to elementary school or junior high.

[Anonymouse]

But 'love' is nothing but a bourgeios lies. There is no such thing.

[loseyourname]

Thank you, Gram Parsons. Love was around well before there was any bourgeousie.

[Anonymouse]

Originally posted by loseyourname Thank you, Gram Parsons. Love was around well before there was any bourgeousie.

That's just something that you've been taught to believe, the caveman didn't know about it, any more than the peasant farmer in the Middle Ages.

It was nothing but a product of bourgeois imaginations in the romantic periods that filtered out such thoughts.

[loseyourname]

Really? You're going to tell me what cavemen and peasants were thinking back in the day? I'm not going on any teachings here. I'm only assuming that men who lived thousands of years were capable of feeling the same emotions that I am. So would you if not for all the pot. Seems reasonable.

[Anonymouse]

Originally posted by loseyourname Really? You're going to tell me what cavemen and peasants were thinking back in the day? I'm not going on any teachings here. I'm only assuming that men who lived thousands of years were capable of feeling the same emotions that I am. So would you if not for all the pot. Seems reasonable.

I'm being sarcastic pinhead, showing you the stupidity behind Marxism.

[whitelotus]

Originally posted by sleuth Thanks guys for your respond...loseyourname and withlotus i have questions for both of you...

what do you think ...

we all separated with our loved once because of fait or love wasnt enough...
i have tend to belive that lack of love is the main reason of separations..
Its just hard to admit ....

the reason why we seperated wasnt for lack of love, it was the opposite, there was too much love. And those around us wouldnt let us be together for personal reasons, im not going to get into it. But the lack of love was not the reason.