Tweet
can you imagine the idiot gore being our president ? lol
hes a whining baby, and a complete moron
hes a whining baby, and a complete moron
-
Last edited by whitelotus; 01-29-2004, 11:56 PM. -
i doubt we'd be as bad off as we are now...you want a bad track record, look at the past 4 years...at least this year the person with the most votes will be President...Originally posted by whitelotus can you imagine the idiot gore being our president ? lol
hes a whining baby, and a complete idiot
now...back to subjectComment
-
Ass being your mascot.Originally posted by jilbagh sorry im not a republican....and it was palookaville
Anyway, the last four years have been tremendous. To blame the fall in the economy on Bush is irresponsible. Consumer shock due to 9/11 caused a drastic decrease in demdand, therefore, supply decreased as well. Also, the business cycle was due for a recession with cycical unemployment.
Bush lowered taxes, and his policy has accounted for the largest growth in GDP since 1984 when Ronald Regan was in office. The past business quarter has experienced a 7.2% increase in GDP, and 500,000 new jobs nationally. With the economy on its way back up, and a firm foreign policy initiative, President Bush has been a very successful President.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by surferarmo Ass being your mascot.
Anyway, the last four years have been tremendous. To blame the fall in the economy on Bush is irresponsible. Consumer shock due to 9/11 caused a drastic decrease in demdand, therefore, supply decreased as well. Also, the business cycle was due for a recession with cycical unemployment.
Bush lowered taxes, and his policy has accounted for the largest growth in GDP since 1984 when Ronald Regan was in office. The past business quarter has experienced a 7.2% increase in GDP, and 500,000 new jobs nationally. With the economy on its way back up, and a firm foreign policy initiative, President Bush has been a very successful President.
lowered whos taxes? that "Tax relief" is scheduled to be repaid in 5 years. and most of us haven't seen a tax relief
his education plan FAILED
college tuition went up due to federal budget cuts that he created the biggest deficiet
the 4th quarter always creates employment duhhh!!!
he's lost over 3 million jobs, over 8 million remain unemployed and 2 million have given up lookin as they lost hope.
foriegn policy? thats why Iraq was so successful?
-We lost more American lives than Iraqi.
-there was no ties of 9/11 and saddam/iraq
-he decided to go into iraq before 9/11
-intelligence reports were falsified to gain approval of war
-he said he would creat a int'l coalition, he lied
-he said war would be a last resort...it wasnt
-he prasied the men and women into going to iraq...then cut their benefits
-he's cut veteran benefits to where some lost their healthcare
-he's reached record defiects...
dont give those bs reasons....its time to move on!
wake up!
Comment
-
It seems you know absolutely nothing of education. For one, you spelled "deficit" wrong.Originally posted by jilbagh lowered whos taxes? that "Tax relief" is scheduled to be repaid in 5 years. and most of us haven't seen a tax relief
his education plan FAILED
college tuition went up due to federal budget cuts that he created the biggest deficiet
the 4th quarter always creates employment duhhh!!!
he's lost over 3 million jobs, over 8 million remain unemployed and 2 million have given up lookin as they lost hope.
foriegn policy? thats why Iraq was so successful?
-We lost more American lives than Iraqi.
-there was no ties of 9/11 and saddam/iraq
-he decided to go into iraq before 9/11
-intelligence reports were falsified to gain approval of war
-he said he would creat a int'l coalition, he lied
-he said war would be a last resort...it wasnt
-he prasied the men and women into going to iraq...then cut their benefits
-he's cut veteran benefits to where some lost their healthcare
-he's reached record defiects...
dont give those bs reasons....its time to move on!
wake up!
www.moveon.org
States have primary control over public education, not the federal government. Sorry, but the cuts for UC schools and k-12 were due to our immediate past governor, Gray Davis. Only 5% of the state's budget augmented for schools is derived from the federal govt. In fact, with his "No Child Left Behind Act" schools that were performing received benefits, and those that werent, didnt really lose anything.
You also mention those that are unemployed. Most of the 8 million people that you mention are unemployed are frictionally unemployed, meaning they are in between jobs. This is common. You will need more precise figures to sway me on the issue. Those who stopped looking for work could not even be counted as unemployed, as they are no longer part of the work force. The only people who are considered as being unemployed are those who are 1. Not currently employed and 2. Looking for employment. If they are not looking for employement, they are not counted in the stats as they do not desire employment and therefore are not counted. You really need to brush up on your economics. This is basic macro econ.
The fourth quarter always creates employment, however it does not always produce such a high increase in GDP which you neglected to touch upon. Economists are still perplexed to the unprecedented increase in worker productivity. This means the nation is becoming wealthier. Also, we did get some tax returns. I got $9.00 back.
Yes, Iraq was successful. Saddam, an evil saddistic dictator was removed from his totalitarian regime to give the freedom loving people of Iraq a chance at self governance. Bush did try to internationalize the effort, however, at the beginning of the conflict with Iraq (It was never formally declared war) countries and the UN did not assist the US in their pursuit for a better and safer Iraq. It was those he seeked that turned him down. Now, when it is all over, everyone wants a piece and say in Iraq. Let the U.S. do the dirty work I suppose!
I have plenty to say about Senator Kerry, but that will be for a later thread. Here is an article piece you should read.
"Reports by the US Senate's committee on banking, housing and urban affairs -- which oversees American exports policy -- reveal that the US, under the successive administrations of Ronald Reagan and George Bush Snr, sold materials including anthrax, VX nerve gas, West Nile fever germs and botulism to Iraq right up until March 1992, as well as germs similar to tuberculosis and pneumonia. Other bacteria sold included brucella melitensis, which damages major organs, and clostridium perfringens, which causes gas gangrene.
Classified US Defence Dep-artment documents also seen by the Sunday Herald show that Britain sold Iraq the drug pralidoxine, an antidote to nerve gas, in March 1992, after the end of the Gulf war. Pralidoxine can be reverse engineered to create nerve gas.
The Senate committee's rep orts on 'US Chemical and Biological Warfare-Related Dual-Use Exports to Iraq', undertaken in 1992 in the wake of the Gulf war, give the date and destination of all US exports. The reports show, for example, that on May 2, 1986, two batches of bacillus anthracis -- the micro-organism that causes anthrax -- were shipped to the Iraqi Ministry of Higher Education, along with two batches of the bacterium clostridium botulinum, the agent that causes deadly botulism poisoning.
One batch each of salmonella and E coli were shipped to the Iraqi State Company for Drug Industries on August 31, 1987. Other shipments went from the US to the Iraq Atomic Energy Commission on July 11, 1988; the Department of Biology at the University of Basrah in November 1989; the Department of Microbiology at Baghdad University in June 1985; the Ministry of Health in April 1985 and Officers' City, a military complex in Baghdad, in March and April 1986."
"We will act peacefully towards Iraq, however, if we must use force then their message is clear. Iraq will be willing to use their weapons of mass destruction." --Bill Clinton February 1998 Senate Report.
Are the Dems lying too?
They therefore have the means of producing WMD's.
Senate Reports dont lie. Only you do.
Peace.Comment
-
read my response in the other topics area...get back to the love mushy ish hereOriginally posted by surferarmo It seems you know absolutely nothing of education. For one, you spelled "deficit" wrong.
States have primary control over public education, not the federal government. Sorry, but the cuts for UC schools and k-12 were due to our immediate past governor, Gray Davis. Only 5% of the state's budget augmented for schools is derived from the federal govt. In fact, with his "No Child Left Behind Act" schools that were performing received benefits, and those that werent, didnt really lose anything.
You also mention those that are unemployed. Most of the 8 million people that you mention are unemployed are frictionally unemployed, meaning they are in between jobs. This is common. You will need more precise figures to sway me on the issue. Those who stopped looking for work could not even be counted as unemployed, as they are no longer part of the work force. The only people who are considered as being unemployed are those who are 1. Not currently employed and 2. Looking for employment. If they are not looking for employement, they are not counted in the stats as they do not desire employment and therefore are not counted. You really need to brush up on your economics. This is basic macro econ.
The fourth quarter always creates employment, however it does not always produce such a high increase in GDP which you neglected to touch upon. Economists are still perplexed to the unprecedented increase in worker productivity. This means the nation is becoming wealthier. Also, we did get some tax returns. I got $9.00 back.
Yes, Iraq was successful. Saddam, an evil saddistic dictator was removed from his totalitarian regime to give the freedom loving people of Iraq a chance at self governance. Bush did try to internationalize the effort, however, at the beginning of the conflict with Iraq (It was never formally declared war) countries and the UN did not assist the US in their pursuit for a better and safer Iraq. It was those he seeked that turned him down. Now, when it is all over, everyone wants a piece and say in Iraq. Let the U.S. do the dirty work I suppose!
I have plenty to say about Senator Kerry, but that will be for a later thread. Here is an article piece you should read.
"Reports by the US Senate's committee on banking, housing and urban affairs -- which oversees American exports policy -- reveal that the US, under the successive administrations of Ronald Reagan and George Bush Snr, sold materials including anthrax, VX nerve gas, West Nile fever germs and botulism to Iraq right up until March 1992, as well as germs similar to tuberculosis and pneumonia. Other bacteria sold included brucella melitensis, which damages major organs, and clostridium perfringens, which causes gas gangrene.
Classified US Defence Dep-artment documents also seen by the Sunday Herald show that Britain sold Iraq the drug pralidoxine, an antidote to nerve gas, in March 1992, after the end of the Gulf war. Pralidoxine can be reverse engineered to create nerve gas.
The Senate committee's rep orts on 'US Chemical and Biological Warfare-Related Dual-Use Exports to Iraq', undertaken in 1992 in the wake of the Gulf war, give the date and destination of all US exports. The reports show, for example, that on May 2, 1986, two batches of bacillus anthracis -- the micro-organism that causes anthrax -- were shipped to the Iraqi Ministry of Higher Education, along with two batches of the bacterium clostridium botulinum, the agent that causes deadly botulism poisoning.
One batch each of salmonella and E coli were shipped to the Iraqi State Company for Drug Industries on August 31, 1987. Other shipments went from the US to the Iraq Atomic Energy Commission on July 11, 1988; the Department of Biology at the University of Basrah in November 1989; the Department of Microbiology at Baghdad University in June 1985; the Ministry of Health in April 1985 and Officers' City, a military complex in Baghdad, in March and April 1986."
"We will act peacefully towards Iraq, however, if we must use force then their message is clear. Iraq will be willing to use their weapons of mass destruction." --Bill Clinton February 1998 Senate Report.
Are the Dems lying too?
They therefore have the means of producing WMD's.
Senate Reports dont lie. Only you do.
Peace.Comment
-
I love how you change the topic because I cornered you. Is that lovy enough for you?Comment
-
you didn't corner xxxx...go read my responses in other topics area....and why i waste my time with senseless bush ass kissing radicals like you, is beyond me...have fun with your hands on vdayOriginally posted by surferarmo I love how you change the topic because I cornered you. Is that lovy enough for you?Comment
-
what do girls get guys for v-day? chocolate is that good u think?Comment
Comment