The pepsi argument

[sleuth]

A man and his wife were getting a divorce at a local court, but the
custody of their children posed a problem. The mother jumped to her
feet and protested to the judge that since she had brought the children
into this world, she should retain custody of them.

The man also wanted custody of his children.
The judge asked for his side of the story, too.

After a long moment of silence, the man rose from the chair and
replied:
"Judge, when I put a dollar into a vending machine, and a Pepsi comes
out, does the Pepsi belong to me or to the machine?"

OOOOOoo MY DEAR(DEER GOD-jeyran astvats hahahaha..this word turns me on ) LORD we have no rights at all....now women are vending machines.

[gevo]

HAHAH.. well.. its a metaphor of a sort.. not a direct relation.. but i gotta tell yeah.. that was a good answer.. lol.. or quetion.. whatever... hmm i should remember this pepsi argument.. lol.

[sleuth]

neh...i changed my mind...my baby will born in this way...

[Anonymouse]

Well, here in California, the law is in favor of women so all men are screwed pretty much when it comes to divorce with alimony and child support, thats why you always get a prenuptual agreement.

[sleuth]

my baby will born with delivery docket on his forhead...

[Anonymouse]

I will oversee the delivery is smooth, by self-styling myself as "Delivery Security".

[Siggie]

isn't this in the wrong forum?

[DvlzAdvocate]

I beg to Differ! During child custody hearings the test that is applied is "the best interest of the child" test. So, if in most cases that means the mother that doesn't mean the Courts are on the Womens side it just means that some Men are idiots, who can't take care of a child.