Interracial Relationships.

[Anonymouse]

I don't like the term ho bag cause it's just too deragotory to women, but I'm assuming you meant it towards men as well. However, I still find it just a little selfrightous to tell other people what is right and wrong to do with their bodies.

And this really is a great bit of irony. You're saying casual sex is wrong even after admiting you yourself have engaged in it ("...I am just as guilty of it..."), and I'm arguing that It should be OK, however I've only had sex with one person in my whole life and it was my girlfriend of a year and a half. Just funny.

That is not irony, because I realize that my behavior was not correct, I know in my gut even during the actions that it was incorrect yet I chose to ignroe conscience, that is what most of the toiling masses do. Like I said, morality is not subjective, it is only relative to those who want to make things pliable, and usually all relativism hovers on around is sex, as St. Augustine brilliantly admitted that it was mans weakest point.

I am to also guess that you support the miscegenation of our commonfolk with every genotype.

[HyeJinx1984]

Too many big words in that there last sentence for a simple minded joe like me. But if what you were trying to say is "do you consent to Armenians breeding outside of our tribe" then I'll just point you a page or two back in this very thread where I stated my opinions on the matter.

As for Morality, man do I go back on forth on the whole "relative" issue... on one hand I think "Everything has to be relative cause everyone is different and none of us can be expected to agree with every one else on the rules of taste and morality" and on the other hand I think to myself "Values are not subjective because there are certain rights and wrongs that we all as human beings agree on, even subconsciously" currently I'm learning more towards the latter, so i agree with you.. morality is not subjective. However, I don't see this as a moral issue.

[angelik22]

okie one point to make...if youre such a strong christian, then what's all this about having sex with all these people and "exploreing it"... that's quite a liberal way to live... not that i have a problem with that...
one more thing... it's either you think having sex with multiple partners is wrong or you think it's right...you canot keep switching back and forth and trying to make a point because youre constantly contradicting yourself...

so my theory holds true about most armenian males in LA...

[HyeJinx1984]

okie one point to make...if youre such a strong christian, then what's all this about having sex with all these people and "exploreing it"... that's quite a liberal way to live... not that i have a problem with that...
one more thing... it's either you think having sex with multiple partners is wrong or you think it's right...you canot keep switching back and forth and trying to make a point because youre constantly contradicting yourself...

so my theory holds true about most armenian males in LA...

*Blink* ... *Blink* ...I have no idea why this is so f*cking complicated.

I think people should be allowed to have casual sex. I am also a strong Christian, albeit a liberal one. I have NO IDEA where these so called contradictions and me going back and forth are. As for being a typical L.A. Armenian, I'd like to point out L.A. Armos are very, very conservative and I share very few belifs with them. This has got to be one of the most circular and ridiculous conversations I've ever been stuck in. I shoulda known better...

[dstyle]

Hey don't talk xxxx about us Armenian males in LA. I'm sick of hearing it, damn it we're the most legit out of any guys.

[HyeJinx1984]

Hey don't talk xxxx about us Armenian males in LA. I'm sick of hearing it, damn it we're the most legit out of any guys.

Agreed.





lmfsnkvjdkvbdkdbdfbkdbfdkbdk Once again, adding random xxxx to make the post long enough to submit.

[SagGal]

lmfsnkvjdkvbdkdbdfbkdbfdkbdk Once again, adding random xxxx to make the post long enough to submit.

Why not just type, "I agree with that post" instead of typing that long nothing.

[Gadelius]

The right to choose one’s own associates or companions, whether in business, in religion or in family life is fundamental to any civilised society. To show a preference to one’s own kind – or ‘racial discrimination’, as it is called in politically-correct jargon – is neither immoral nor socially unhealthy – despite what ‘they’ tell you. It is indeed the expression of a gregarious instinct inherent in the racial affinity that has resulted in the social stability indispensable to any [ traditionally ] national life.

Sanguine hopes that the disposition to preferential association will be eliminated by so-called ‘education’, by legislation or by time itself seem belied by historic experience. Only a sensitive awareness of the complexity of the problems which face our world in the increasingly frequent contact of races and cultures can assist us in avoiding the tragedy that has attended such contacts in the past. That men are capable of meeting those problems and resolving them equitably is admittedly something of an article of faith – an article of faith, however, supported by some compelling instances of contemporary racial accommodation. But it is an article of faith we must ascertain if we are not disposed supinely to submit ourselves to tragedy.

My uncertainty, however, concerns more the meaning of ‘race’ in this context.

[ckBejug]

The right to choose one’s own associates or companions, whether in business, in religion or in family life is fundamental to any civilised society. To show a preference to one’s own kind – or ‘racial discrimination’, as it is called in politically-correct jargon – is neither immoral nor socially unhealthy – despite what ‘they’ tell you. It is indeed the expression of a gregarious instinct inherent in the racial affinity that has resulted in the social stability indispensable to any [ traditionally ] national life.

Sanguine hopes that the disposition to preferential association will be eliminated by so-called ‘education’, by legislation or by time itself seem belied by historic experience. Only a sensitive awareness of the complexity of the problems which face our world in the increasingly frequent contact of races and cultures can assist us in avoiding the tragedy that has attended such contacts in the past. That men are capable of meeting those problems and resolving them equitably is admittedly something of an article of faith – an article of faith, however, supported by some compelling instances of contemporary racial accommodation. But it is an article of faith we must ascertain if we are not disposed supinely to submit ourselves to tragedy.

My uncertainty, however, concerns more the meaning of ‘race’ in this context.

What started off as a mixed-race relationships thread turned into an Armenians vs. the rest of the non-Armenian world thread, so the lines between race and ethnicity got blurred. Initially this was supposed to be about interracial relationships. However, your post can be an answer, a very good answer, to both.

[HyeJinx1984]

Why not just type, "I agree with that post" instead of typing that long nothing.

Once again our sisters out smart me...