Is your intellectual thinking keeping you from being social?

[thedebutante]

I'm sooooooo scared....

I suggest mass suicide, just so you wont be doing anything by yourself. You know?

[Anonymouse]

What can I do to be better than you?

Nothing really .

[winoman]

What can I do to be better than you?

I'd say breath and don't tie more then one hand behind your back...

[thedebutante]

I'd say breath and don't tie more then one hand behind your back...

Breath is a noun. Breathe, on the other hand, is a verb.

[Crimson Glow]

Looks like you just contributed to what we're doing. Oh, the hypocrisy!

Yeeeaaahhh......that's it. I just contributed to it. Are you completely delirious? That's two grammatical train recks for posts you've made. First, your post about an imaginary "hypocrisy" you "purposefully construed", and now, inappropriately using the word hypocrisy again. How is asking people in a fight to calm down contributing to the fight? There's no hypocrisy, here. Only you setting a fine example of what we've been talking about in this thread.

Mouse - He may have brought up some counter points, but there was no reason to take it in a harsh way, or feel you need to retaliate in a "one up" insulting mannar. Why can't you simply explain "hey, don't take everything I say at face value. Some things I say are meant to be taken with a grain of salt, others you're taking out of context"? We've certainly had our share of disputes, but I've never resulted to name calling simply because you don't agree, which is more then I can say for you.

Winoman - I understand your points, and they did add to the convo. But you did put an almost...personal attack touch to the way you phrased your initial response. Whether you meant to, or not, I don't know. But I'm just saying, from a 3rd party stand point, I could see it being misunderstood for that. And it's mouse who wants to be misunderstood.

[Crimson Glow]

*Looks at the number of responses*

Jesus Christ. I really gotta' stop answering IMs while in the middle of writting posts.

[Thai-Samurai]

Yeah, and I already figured out that you can't be better than him. So I guess there's not much left to talk about in this thread.

[Anonymouse]

Yeeeaaahhh......that's it. I just contributed to it. Are you completely delirious? That's two grammatical train recks for posts you've made. First, your post about an imaginary "hypocrisy" you "purposefully construed", and now, inappropriately using the word hypocrisy again. How is asking people in a fight to calm down contributing to the fight? There's no hypocrisy, here. Only you setting a fine example of what we've been talking about in this thread.

Mouse - He may have brought up some counter points, but there was no reason to take it in a harsh way, or feel you need to retaliate in a "one up" insulting mannar. Why can't you simply explain "hey, don't take everything I say at face value. Some things I say are meant to be taken with a grain of salt, others you're taking out of context"? We've certainly had our share of disputes, but I've never resulted to name calling simply because you don't agree, which is more then I can say for you.

Winoman - I understand your points, and they did add to the convo. But you did put an almost...personal attack touch to the way you phrased your initial response. Whether you meant to, or not, I don't know. But I'm just saying, from a 3rd party stand point, I could see it being misunderstood for that. And it's mouse who wants to be misunderstood.

I didn't name call you here, so calm down. I did attack winoman, aka thoth, becuase that is what he likes, to be name called. He really likes it trust me. And I did not take it in a harsh way, I simply gave him he he likes, the truth.

[winoman]

Breath is a noun. Breathe, on the other hand, is a verb.

Why thank you - I'll make sure to run all my posts by you for spelling corrections...now dosn't it feel good to be useful?

[thedebutante]

Yeeeaaahhh......that's it. I just contributed to it. Are you completely delirious? That's two grammatical train recks for posts you've made. First, your post about an imaginary "hypocrisy" you "purposefully construed", and now, inappropriately using the word hypocrisy again. How is asking people in a fight to calm down contributing to the fight? There's no hypocrisy, here. Only you setting a fine example of what we've been talking about in this thread.

Just because you're not capable of seeing it, doesn't mean it's imaginary.