Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why couldn't Armenians....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ara87
    replied
    Re: Why couldn't Armenians....

    Originally posted by Palavra View Post
    how can you not follow pro-armenian politics when you are armenian? Saying that we should follow proarmenian politic is oximoron.. (After nationalism.)

    Also unity is generally something unproductive. Turks did not built their empires when they are united and Ottomans began to decline, after Sultan controled all rebellions and competing factions.
    Didn't Turks see some of there best times under the sultan's though? What about Suleiman the Great? And look at the Arabs today... If they were united as one for the past century, they would have a lot more influence in the world than they already do, and probably been able to expand more into Africa, Anatolia, Caucasia, Iran, and onwards, culturally if not geographically as well. And the world wouldn't have done anything as long as it was getting it's oil and other resources.

    Originally posted by Palavra View Post
    By the way, just for an extra lip service, You looks so handsome..
    .
    Last edited by ara87; 11-13-2008, 04:58 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Palavra
    replied
    Re: Why couldn't Armenians....

    how can you not follow pro-armenian politics when you are armenian? Saying that we should follow proarmenian politic is oximoron.. (After nationalism.)

    Also unity is generally something unproductive. Turks did not built their empires when they are united and Ottomans began to decline, after Sultan controled all rebellions and competing factions.

    Leave a comment:


  • UrMistake
    replied
    Re: Why couldn't Armenians....

    we nead an proArmenian policy now days cause others will use armenian benefit for there own,we nead a strong armenia with real allyes Russia,Iran,Greece,whay is so hard to be united?look Israel thay dont have a vast land but they are among the first and yet many nations opose them.today sokme say we nead more land to be stong,its true but how can we ever take those land?no 1 will give them back,so no other whay fo as,we nead to build up armenia,first we nead strong law and next a strong economy,to secure these 2 things we nead to be united with srong Politicans.We can be strong but who will lead as?what political party?with so many pro-country lovers how can we be united?i think that is the problem.cant we have them just allyes?se Serbia they lost Kosovo and they had more suport from russia more than armenia in NKR war,dont forget only we will make ourselfs strong we will fight for our intrests.

    Leave a comment:


  • jgk3
    replied
    Re: Why couldn't Armenians....

    Originally posted by Armenian View Post
    Yes, that's good and all but if we don't have a powerful establishment in Armenia today that is pro-Russian and pro-Armenian, we will lose everything because unlike other more isolated nations, Armenia is located in a nasty intersection that does not allow room for even small mistakes. Like I said, juggling between many different political influences while maintaining 'one' is a very complex thing to do for a nation like Armenia.
    Yes, I realize that. A pro-Armenia nucleus was lacking during the Ottoman times obviously as well, we don't want to go back to those days.

    Leave a comment:


  • Armenian
    replied
    Re: Why couldn't Armenians....

    Originally posted by jgk3 View Post
    I actually agree with this very much. Just as an individual needs to be open to the different aspects of their environment which is always in transition, so does an organic society. Nations are no exceptions to this rule. If you stick to one set of interests and ignore all others, you close your windows and become isolated and as a result, weaker and smaller. You also lose a degree of integrity, as you are becoming overly paranoid or obsessive in order to cling onto an imbalanced agenda or set of beliefs.
    Yes, that's good and all but if we don't have a powerful establishment in Armenia today that is pro-Russian and pro-Armenian, we will lose everything because unlike other more isolated nations, Armenia is located in a nasty intersection that does not allow room for even small mistakes. Like I said, juggling between many different political influences while maintaining 'one' is a very complex thing to do for a nation like Armenia.

    Leave a comment:


  • jgk3
    replied
    Re: Why couldn't Armenians....

    Originally posted by Armenian View Post
    As such, Armenia needs a pro-Armenia (nationalist) contingent, pro-West contingent, pro-Russian contingent, a pro-Persian contingent, a Turkish friendly contingent... So on.
    I actually agree with this very much. Just as an individual needs to be open to the different aspects of their environment which is always in transition, so does an organic society. Nations are no exceptions to this rule.

    If you stick to one set of interests and ignore all others, you close your windows and become isolated and as a result, weaker and smaller. You also lose a degree of integrity, as you are becoming overly paranoid or obsessive in order to cling onto an imbalanced agenda or set of beliefs.
    Last edited by jgk3; 11-13-2008, 09:26 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Armenian
    replied
    Re: Why couldn't Armenians....

    Originally posted by Federate View Post
    It's this disunity that has ironically enabled us to survive. We've been surrounded and have been a stepping stone on the feet of countless huge empires. Every time some large empire came at our doorsteps, Armenian nobility would divide itself into two: one camp would be pro-invading empire and one camp would be pro-Armenian. Win-win situation. For example, when the Persians and the Byzantines both wanted to conquer us, we divided ourselves into three, one holding the fort, one being pro-Byzantine and one being pro-Persian. There was no way to to wiped out of the map this way. One would topple and the other one would survive. Sure it cost us independence many times and prevented us from being an empire but we're still here today and many, many other nations are not. This tactic is an effective way to survive. Of course, geopolitics have changed since then and things are a little different now.
    You have just expressed great wisdom, Federate. I fully, completely and totally agree with you! Although our lack of political unity has not allowed us Armenians to become a powerful empire, it has nevertheless allowed us to survive in times of great geopolitical upheaval. Our political "disunity" is a very painful yet one of the essential factors in our survival as a people.

    However, this approach/realization is has to be considered very cautiously. Understanding the historical benefits of our political disunity does not mean we must promote disunity in the present day. Sadly, disunity amongst any group of people come naturally, we need not promote it. Maintaining a balance between unity and disunity is as difficult as it is delicate. As much as Armenian nationalists/patriots may oppose it, the Armenian nation, as a whole, must allow political dissent and alternative viewpoints. As such, Armenia needs a pro-Armenia (nationalist) contingent, pro-West contingent, pro-Russian contingent, a pro-Persian contingent, a Turkish friendly contingent... So on. However, for the sake of meeting the complex geopolitical requirements for the foreseeable future in the Caucasus, the pro-Russian and pro-Armenia contingents in Armenia must be in power. There is no other way about it...

    In a real sense, Armenia has been located in one of the world's most dangerous and busy intersections. Literally and figuratively speaking, Armenia has been under constant bombardment from east, west, south and north. Under such dire/complex conditions, how can a nation maintain a delicate political balance, how can a nation compose itself and grow? As you can see, this is a very complex/perilous condition for a small nation like Armenia to be in, and one of the main reasons why we have been unsuccessful in building a large and powerful nation.

    Originally posted by Federate View Post
    As for our population, does anyone really believe we're only 8 million? We've been here for 2500+ years... so many Armenian children must have popped up over the years and I believe a large percentage of Turks and Kurds are actually Armenians who over the years were Muslimized, genocided, kidnapped etc. There's no way we're this few.
    In a sense, from Europe to Persia, from Russia to the Middle East, individuals of Armenian 'decent' who do not know they are Armenians most probably number in the many tens of millions worldwide... Individuals that can readily trace their Armenian heritage number perhaps around ten million... But 'real' Armenians probably number in the hundreds of thousands... At most.

    Leave a comment:


  • jgk3
    replied
    Re: Why couldn't Armenians....

    Originally posted by Federate View Post
    It's this disunity that has ironically enabled us to survive. We've been surrounded and have been a stepping stone on the feet of countless huge empires. Every time some large empire came at our doorsteps, Armenian nobility would divide itself into two: one camp would be pro-invading empire and one camp would be pro-Armenian. Win-win situation. For example, when the Persians and the Byzantines both wanted to conquer us, we divided ourselves into three, one holding the fort, one being pro-Byzantine and one being pro-Persian. There was no way to to wiped out of the map this way. One would topple and the other one would survive. Sure it cost us independence many times and prevented us from being an empire but we're still here today and many, many other nations are not. This tactic is an effective way to survive. Of course, geopolitics have changed since then and things are a little different now.

    As for our population, does anyone really believe we're only 8 million? We've been here for 2500+ years... so many Armenian children must have popped up over the years and I believe a large percentage of Turks and Kurds are actually Armenians who over the years were Muslimized, genocided, kidnapped etc. There's no way we're this few.
    It's true that what our nobility did in Byzantine times for example actually enabled us to survive even though we were being overrun by Greeks and Persians, but I think things changed under the Ottoman yoke. Our people became more interested in integrating themselves to the Ottoman system through climbing up the ranks as bankers and merchants but were not interested in cultivating any kind of movement that wanted to create a state for Armenians.

    Forgetting how to fight, Armenians ended up at the mercy of Turks, who at some point during the end of the Ottoman empire's line, chose to secure a victory by robbing Armenians of the wealth and livelihood we attained under their system. Armenians got screwed in this instance because of their political disunity and lack of organization, though the seeds were sown for Tseghakron and Dashnaktsutyan for those of us who wanted to defend our sense of nation from then on.

    Leave a comment:


  • Federate
    replied
    Re: Why couldn't Armenians....

    Originally posted by skhara View Post
    When population grows naturally, there would be over 5 million. Armenian princess all wanted to rule over their own castles. It's the failure to unite under a single sovereignty that hurt us terribly throughout history.
    It's this disunity that has ironically enabled us to survive. We've been surrounded and have been a stepping stone on the feet of countless huge empires. Every time some large empire came at our doorsteps, Armenian nobility would divide itself into two: one camp would be pro-invading empire and one camp would be pro-Armenian. Win-win situation. For example, when the Persians and the Byzantines both wanted to conquer us, we divided ourselves into three, one holding the fort, one being pro-Byzantine and one being pro-Persian. There was no way to to wiped out of the map this way. One would topple and the other one would survive. Sure it cost us independence many times and prevented us from being an empire but we're still here today and many, many other nations are not. This tactic is an effective way to survive. Of course, geopolitics have changed since then and things are a little different now.

    As for our population, does anyone really believe we're only 8 million? We've been here for 2500+ years... so many Armenian children must have popped up over the years and I believe a large percentage of Turks and Kurds are actually Armenians who over the years were Muslimized, genocided, kidnapped etc. There's no way we're this few.

    Leave a comment:


  • jgk3
    replied
    Re: Why couldn't Armenians....

    At this point we'd better learn from our mistakes once and for all. There are too many examples of our failures to unite and stand for Armenia to ignore.

    Ara, land changes hands, its the nature of land. Populations change too, whether through tragedy or prosperity. What doesn't change is the underlying ethos and soul of Armenia, unless it is forgotten for good. So long as it is alive in the people, we will naturally stand and fight for our nation. We will naturally have interest in our civilization and all that it has created. We will want to continue it out of love for it, and if land is required for some of its aspects, we will seek to attain it and build on it.

    What's important is to first and foremost feel this and contribute what you can to Armenia and Armenians, not to look at demographic charts and run away at the sight of hopeless statistics. That is a mentality of the masses who's sole existence is based upon this idea of finding a place to live. Obviously a human is endowed with more creativity than that in finding a purpose in life.

    It is obvious that one cannot build an empire, let alone keep the RA from being overrun, if cowardliness is the mentality of its people.
    Last edited by jgk3; 11-13-2008, 07:44 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X