Re: Kocharian Visits Karabakh
Can't the same can be achieved with the two country model? Personally, I don't see a fundamental advantage in the one country model. Also, from a tactical and feasibility point of view, I agree with CatWoman. Briefly said, I don't see the difference as essential, even if they differ from an organizational, operational, legal etc. point of views.
Without going into the details, it may be compared to large companies who put forward a single "identity" - or brand name - but are, for practical reasons, organized as multiple legal entities - i.e. corporations.
For the record, I don't have in mind mergers and acquisitions, as they usually involve different brand names. For instance, the Morgan Stanley brand is different from the Discover and Dean Witter brands - though, the same company after mergers; however, the Morgan Stanley brand itself, is composed of different corporations - from a legal point of view.
I see the Armenia-Diaspora collaboration in the same way: the same brand name, multiple entities.
To repeat myself, what are the advantages of the one country model???
I the following:
Is the question/focus:
1. Why Robert Kotcharian suggests to sign agreements, as if there were two distinct entities?
2. Is his presidency was unconstitutional?
3. Are Soviets running Armenia?
(By the way, I don't see a connection between "color revolution" and the "Soviets running Armenia;" can you explain yourself?)
Originally posted by freakyfreaky
View Post
Without going into the details, it may be compared to large companies who put forward a single "identity" - or brand name - but are, for practical reasons, organized as multiple legal entities - i.e. corporations.
For the record, I don't have in mind mergers and acquisitions, as they usually involve different brand names. For instance, the Morgan Stanley brand is different from the Discover and Dean Witter brands - though, the same company after mergers; however, the Morgan Stanley brand itself, is composed of different corporations - from a legal point of view.
I see the Armenia-Diaspora collaboration in the same way: the same brand name, multiple entities.
To repeat myself, what are the advantages of the one country model???
Originally posted by freakyfreaky
View Post
Originally posted by freakyfreaky
View Post
1. Why Robert Kotcharian suggests to sign agreements, as if there were two distinct entities?
2. Is his presidency was unconstitutional?
3. Are Soviets running Armenia?
(By the way, I don't see a connection between "color revolution" and the "Soviets running Armenia;" can you explain yourself?)
Comment