Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan

    From Twitter

    35 minutes ago
    как понимаю, если не вернуть позиции, которые были захвачены около села Талыш, то там больше никто жить не будет. Матагис тоже.
    as I understand, if you do not return items that were captured near the village of Talysh, there's nobody else will not live. Mataghis too.

    2 minutes ago
    высота к Мадагису не имеет отношения, просто и там и там 3км до фронта
    height to Madagisu is not relevant, just both 3 km away up front

    Comment


    • Re: Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan

      Originally posted by armnuke View Post
      We acquired the SCUDs in 1995 and showed it in 2003.

      Iskanders will be shown in 2020
      The scuds were shown back in 2011,not 2003

      Comment


      • Re: Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan

        Originally posted by Lori View Post
        Eh, most of their stuff isn't very unique. They take Soviet designed small arms and just kit them out with pic rails, modern stocks, and suppressors. Whats worse is that they present this to the military expecting them to take interest. What they need to design is an practical and inexpensive domestic modernization of the AK-74 that suits Armenia's needs. That means no suppressors, cut down on the pic rails, introduce a stock that can fold or collapse, and present an optic that can be used by the average rifleman. We have already seen this initiative with the bullpup K-3, which has its own flaws. (Like the rifle grenade, rifle grenades became obsolete with the creation of the grenade launcher, which is much more effective and has less recoil)

        Getting their hands on AK modernization kits that the Russian Army is issuing is probably the best thing the military could do at the moment. If Aspar can present a viable alternative, then I would be impressed. So far, all they have showed off is AKs and SVDs with flashy attachments and paint jobs.
        They designed new handguns for both the army and special forces,many bolt-action snipers,a short assault rifle with a folding stock(saw the president holding it once) give them time and they'll prove themselves

        Comment


        • Re: Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan

          Originally posted by Lori View Post
          I will breakdown Samvel's arguments and give my opinion on them





          Not true at all, his ties to the Russian Generals are showing. Russia is pursuing is fruitless endeavor at reintegrating Azerbaijan into their sphere. Azerbaijan is GONE. It is a Turkish puppet state and has been since that Elchibey. There are even rumors that the Azerbaijani military and interior ministry are controlled by Turkish Generals.



          This is obvious. Our government got too comfortable with the status quo and let their guard down.



          They are unwilling to compromise because they have the technological and numerical upperhand. The oil revenue and support from Turkey have allowed the Azerbaijanis to technologically modernize their armed forces to a ridiculous level. They are currently a lightyear ahead of us in terms of technological and this IS NOT to be underestimated.



          This is the part where many get confused.

          Armenia is lacking severely in these areas:

          Armored vehicles (Severely lacking; Technological disparity)

          Self-propelled artillery (severely lacking)

          Air superiority/Multirole fighters (severely lacking

          Armenia is superior to Azerbaijan when it comes to ballistic missile forces. We simply have way more which can overwhelm their air defense network. The acquisition of Iskander would only strengthen this.

          Armenia has also closed a very important gap - MLRS

          The upcoming acquisition of TOS-1A and Smerch MLRS has fully closed this disparity. This is a success achieved in the arms race

          We need to begin full-scale modernization of our main battle tanks and we need to begin acquiring more modern IFVs.



          I 100% agree. Ceding some parts of the buffer zone back to the Azerbaijanis, which would allow their refugees to return, would be not only the right thing to do but the smart thing to do. We should retain Karvachar and Lachin, as those are vital to Armenian national and water security along with retaining NK itself. Aghdam, Fuzili, Zangilan, etc should be given back to Azerbaijan. These regions are nothing but desolate ruins and would become and economic burden to develop again. No one lives there as well. I know in the past 120 years, we have lost a lot - too much. Sometimes you have to compromise and Samvel is right here. Solving our problems with Azerbaijan peacefully would also allow us on focusing more of our effort on regaining regions like Kars, Ardahan and Mt. Ararat. We should have made claims to those lands yesterday....Things like the BTC pipeline would become a non-issue.

          How I see things

          Forgot drones,both for reconnaissance and strike missions

          Comment


          • Re: Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan

            Originally posted by Lori View Post
            2020 is a bit too far away hahaha. We've been in negotiations with Russia since 2014, officially since July 2015. Iskander-M exports were officially permitted this year. Don't surprised if you see them in the parade. However, it all depends on timing of the deliveries.



            Ceding territory back to Azerbaijan is a much better deal than the "phased" settlement the OSCE has in mind.

            If we were to go to war, right now. It wouldn't end well for anyone, but the Azerbaijanis dont know that. Their arms purchases have given them immense confidence. We need to move up in the armament ladder and intimidate them back to the negotiating table. I want to go back to complete indifference towards Azeris. I never cared for them and never will. It is the Turk to our West that is the problem that must be dealt with, who currently occupies nearly half of the Republic of Armenia.
            --- ceding territory back to azer/turc is much better deal than phased settlement the Osceola has in mind ---
            Your implying those are the only two options. Option #3 ... No land is given back.
            The turc (azer) or to our west, operate under fraudulent premise. Ther entire reason for being in the Caucasus or any part of the Armenian Highland is by murder and theft. These actions of today are a direct reflection of our encounter with these nomadic criminals since day #1.
            This is actually the same assault continued to 5/25/16 , 12:07pm Alaska time.

            Comment


            • Re: Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan

              The government keeps injecting fear for loosing Artsakh and a false hope that one day they will eliminate corruption, rejuvenate economy and pull Armenia from current deadlock and solve Artsakh problem.
              Guess what? They never will. To do so will mean removing selfs from power.
              All the negotiations and proposals about Artsakh conflict are also not about solving it. One way or another those international negotiations or proposals have been opened and debunckted in this or other forums.
              The only path is our nationalist path. Artsakh is Armenian and independent. That's it.
              All the territories under Artsakhs controll belong to Artsakh. Period.
              Azerbaijan either has to accept this or can do whatever it wishes(doing this now). Armenians are ready to fight to the end for it.
              This is the only way to cut this Gordon knot.
              There should be negotiations for peace. Not land.
              Changing government will let us put forward this conditions and stop land bargains.

              Comment


              • Re: Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan

                Originally posted by Lori View Post
                Ceding territory back to Azerbaijan is a much better deal
                Most turkish and azeri political forums do think in the same line in regards Armenia and Armenians. "Ceding territory back to Armenia is a much better deal".

                Comment


                • Re: Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan

                  How did we start from a simple military information too suddenly criticising the Armenian government shouldn't we be talking about our military problems rather than complaining about corruption, were getting off track here.

                  Or we can just make a anti corruption thread and put our complaints there.
                  Last edited by DieHard69; 05-26-2016, 12:48 PM. Reason: Typos are fun

                  Comment


                  • Re: Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan

                    Originally posted by Artashes View Post
                    --- ceding territory back to azer/turc is much better deal than phased settlement the Osceola has in mind ---
                    Your implying those are the only two options. Option #3 ... No land is given back.
                    The turc (azer) or to our west, operate under fraudulent premise. Ther entire reason for being in the Caucasus or any part of the Armenian Highland is by murder and theft. These actions of today are a direct reflection of our encounter with these nomadic criminals since day #1.
                    This is actually the same assault continued to 5/25/16 , 12:07pm Alaska time.
                    Yes, those are Armenia's options. The idea that those territories will remain under Armenian control with Great Power approval is naive. Some of it is to go back, end of story. Retaining the territory would involved going to war, which would be disastrous for Armenia. Be smart, not suicidal.

                    I suggest you adopt a different outlook on the situation, as yours is quite archaic and bizarre. The origins of the Azerbaijanis is entirely irrelevant to the political situation, national security of states, international law, etc. It is also completely irrelevant to the geographic political boundaries of the Caucasus.

                    How did we start from a simple military information too suddenly criticising the Armenian government shouldn't we be talking about our military problems rather than complaining about corruption, were getting off track here.

                    Or we can just make a anti corruption thread and put our complaints there.
                    We are talking about corruption in the government because it is directly related to the dismissals of several Army commanders and a reshuffling of the command staff.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan

                      Originally posted by Lori View Post
                      Yes, those are Armenia's options. The idea that those territories will remain under Armenian control with Great Power approval is naive. Some of it is to go back, end of story.
                      Once the greater powers start talking on Crimea, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Palestine, Falklands, Northern Cyprus, Western Armenia … We will consider being reasonable with what others dissected our existence. The China sea is being reshaped right now, where are the "greater power/s"?
                      Last edited by Azad; 05-26-2016, 01:45 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X