Re: Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan
[QUOTE=gokorik;324117]
Dear,
I'm afraid, I have seen more war than you will ever see in your life, at least I hope so for our nation.
There is no village or valley from Omar to Horatiz, and Mintchevan I have not set foot on.
I think I have a very good idea, wich type and quality of armament appeared, on wich side, and thanks to whom, at its precise date.
I know equally, how, and thanks to wich kind of patriotism our unknown heroes managed to provide arms, from all over ex-USSR, and at wich price/sacrifice they were acquired.
I remember pretty well the first AK47, the first Grad, the first T55/72, the first Su-25/Mig21/Mig 25, Mi24, the first ...., and on wich side they appeared.
I remember to well 12 Jun 1992...
I do know what life was in the black, frozing and unsecure badvals of Stepanakert's law quality soviet buildings, under cluster bombs dropped by russian and ukrainian pilots... and I do remember the ghosty streets of Yerevan, with people burning their soviet encyclopedias...
Thank you for your arrogant ignorance.
Concerning Ciller's threat/Shaposhnikov's WWIII , I'm afraid you need more information on that particular episode. And you need to look a little more than Wikipedia, Tom de Wall and Tomy Goltz's versions.
Unfortunately for us, (and for virtually all of Russia's allies during last 3 centuries), Russia's unreliability is so redondant, from V.Piotr to Medvedev, that this is not even a matter of debate.
Just learn history.
Without going too far away, just explain the bigottery of Medvedev, the Gasman, corrupted to the bones, wishing to offer Artsakh, on a silver plate, for the sake of a flirt with the turks, he knew by advance, had no futur....
An ally of the sort, is the best someone can wish to its worst enemy.
Nevertheless, this is our strategic Ally, called Russia, and we have to cope with it.
And it is not by a mix of childish propaganda/blind love and wishful thinking that you will avoid the repetition of the bad surprises of history.
[QUOTE=gokorik;324117]
Dear,
I'm afraid, I have seen more war than you will ever see in your life, at least I hope so for our nation.
There is no village or valley from Omar to Horatiz, and Mintchevan I have not set foot on.
I think I have a very good idea, wich type and quality of armament appeared, on wich side, and thanks to whom, at its precise date.
I know equally, how, and thanks to wich kind of patriotism our unknown heroes managed to provide arms, from all over ex-USSR, and at wich price/sacrifice they were acquired.
I remember pretty well the first AK47, the first Grad, the first T55/72, the first Su-25/Mig21/Mig 25, Mi24, the first ...., and on wich side they appeared.
I remember to well 12 Jun 1992...
I do know what life was in the black, frozing and unsecure badvals of Stepanakert's law quality soviet buildings, under cluster bombs dropped by russian and ukrainian pilots... and I do remember the ghosty streets of Yerevan, with people burning their soviet encyclopedias...
Thank you for your arrogant ignorance.
Concerning Ciller's threat/Shaposhnikov's WWIII , I'm afraid you need more information on that particular episode. And you need to look a little more than Wikipedia, Tom de Wall and Tomy Goltz's versions.
Unfortunately for us, (and for virtually all of Russia's allies during last 3 centuries), Russia's unreliability is so redondant, from V.Piotr to Medvedev, that this is not even a matter of debate.
Just learn history.
Without going too far away, just explain the bigottery of Medvedev, the Gasman, corrupted to the bones, wishing to offer Artsakh, on a silver plate, for the sake of a flirt with the turks, he knew by advance, had no futur....
An ally of the sort, is the best someone can wish to its worst enemy.
Nevertheless, this is our strategic Ally, called Russia, and we have to cope with it.
And it is not by a mix of childish propaganda/blind love and wishful thinking that you will avoid the repetition of the bad surprises of history.
Comment