Re: Bashar al-Assad, Syria and the Armenian people
I don't think it is that well worded - it is better than no words at all, but not by much. It displays an almost masochistic regard for the inevitability of disaster. This is what I meant when I wrote about what i see as a "Just do nothing and wait for the thing to happen that you think has to always happen" attitude. If he is that concerned about past disasters - why the complete inability to try to prevent future ones? The inevitability of the complete destruction of Armenian Kessab was as inevitable as the complete destruction of Armenian Aleppo which was in turn as inevitable as the complete destruction of Iraq's Armenian community which was in turn as inevitable as ....and so on. Sargsyan should not need to go all the way back to 1909 or 1915 to know that. All Armenians seem capable of doing is after-disaster hand wringing. I'm not saying that some Armenian hero should hack the head off some American soldier or politician to wake the world up (though what a wonderous moment that would be), but Armenians seem so cowed and defferential they barely whisper a protest at their own extinction.
Why is Sargsyan not sending some of Armenia's armed forces directly to Syria to defend Armenians there? Or is that remit for humanitarian protection of its people only allowable for America or Russia or France or Turkey? Or is it just that Sargsyan is too unimaginative to actually do something beyond words?
Originally posted by TomServo
View Post
Why is Sargsyan not sending some of Armenia's armed forces directly to Syria to defend Armenians there? Or is that remit for humanitarian protection of its people only allowable for America or Russia or France or Turkey? Or is it just that Sargsyan is too unimaginative to actually do something beyond words?
Comment