Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Prospects of a Kurdish state and what it means for Armenia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Prospects of a Kurdish state and what it means for Armenia

    CHANGES IN TURKEY'S BORDERS?
    by MURAT YETKÄ°N

    Hurriyet
    July 26 2012
    Turkey

    The fact that some Syrian border posts are no longer controlled by
    troops loyal to Bashar al-Assad but by Syrian Kurdish rebel groups, and
    that Kurdish flags have been raised in some Syrian border towns with
    Kurdish populations, has seriously disturbed the Turkish government.

    One group in particular has attracted Turkey's attention, the
    well-organized Democratic Union Party (PYD), which according to
    spokespersons "shares the same ideology" with the Kurdistan Workers'
    Party (PKK). The PKK has been waging an armed campaign against Turkey
    for the last three decades, claiming more than forty thousand lives
    to date.

    Concern about the rise of the PYD caused Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan
    to convene an emergency meeting in Ankara with his top security and
    foreign policy team members. Another matter of concern to Ankara
    was the fact that some of the Syrian Kurdish militants in Syria have
    been sheltered and trained by the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG)
    in Iraq, while the KRG's leader Masoud Barzani has promised Erdogan
    that he will convince the PKK (based in his territory) to give up
    its "armed struggle" against Turkey. The government is going to take
    some "additional measures" against the PKK presence along the Turkish
    borders with Syria and Iraq, according to a statement issued following
    the meeting.

    Turkey's border with Iraq was settled in an agreement with the United
    Kingdom when it was the mandatory power there, following a serious of
    Kurdish uprisings (supposedly assisted by British-backed agitators)
    in 1926, three years after the regime change in Turkey from Sultanate
    to Republic. The border with Syria was settled when the people of
    the border province of Hatay voted to be a part of Turkey rather than
    remain with the newly founded Syria under French mandate in 1938.

    Actually, the territories of the failing Turkish Empire under the
    Ottoman dynasty almost a century ago were "shared" among Britain,
    France and Czarist Russia, via a secret agreement to the Sykes-Picot
    plan of 1916, which was then exposed in the Brest-Litovsk peace
    agreement in 1918 by the Soviet leadership who seized power in Russia
    through the Bolshevik revolution of 1917.

    Another wave of border changes came about with the collapse of
    the Soviet Union in the early 1990s. Some were peaceful, like the
    reunification of Germany and the "Velvet Divorce" that gave birth
    to the Czech and Slovak Republics. But Yugoslavia was split into six
    parts via a human disaster that has not come to an end even today.

    Borders in the Caucasus are also not in a stable condition yet, with
    ongoing disputes between Azerbaijan and Armenia and Russia and Georgia.

    Following the instability of borders in regions northwest and northeast
    of Turkey, now the Arab Spring has caused instabilities on Turkey's
    southern and southeastern borders, which consist mostly of straight
    lines drawn in the sand by Mr. Sykes and Mr. Picot according to
    their strategic value as determined by energy resources. As the
    territorial integrity of Syria and Iraq is in greater jeopardy with
    every passing day, the borders become more unstable and the Kurds
    arise as independent actors in regional politics.

    Yet there are three countries in the region which have the capability
    to expand, rather than shrink: Israel, Iran and Turkey. There are
    already political and economic actors trying to push Turkey to claim
    some energy-rich parts of Iraq and Syria, which would mean a regime
    change such as a federated Turkey, with Kurdish and possibly Arabic
    members. But Ankara instinctively resists the idea of border changes,
    which could drag the whole region into a chain reaction of wars. The
    region is heading towards a dangerously unstable phase because of
    the civil war in Syria.

    Comment


    • Re: Prospects of a Kurdish state and what it means for Armenia

      Comment


      • Re: Prospects of a Kurdish state and what it means for Armenia

        Թուրքական վերլուծաբաններին մտահոգում է «Քրդական գարնան» հնարավորությունը


        Հուլիս 28, 2012
        Թուրք վերլուծաբանները լրջորեն մտահոգված են Սիրիայում քրդերի ակտիվացմամբ` կարծելով, թե ստեղծված իրավիճակը կարող է քրդական պետության ձեւավորման սկիզբ լինել, այն դեպքում, երբ Թուրքիայի կառավարությունը որեւէ քայլ չի ձեռնարկում:

        «Այն, ինչից մենք վախենում էինք տարիներ շարունակ, այսօր տեղի է ունենում ոչ կոմպետենտության եւ սահմանափակ մտածողության պատճառով»,-կարծում է CNNturk-ի գլխավոր խմբագիր, վերլուծաբան Մեհմեդ Ալի Բիրանդը:

        Նրա խոսքով, որքան շատ Բաշար Ասադն իր ուշադրությունը կենտրոնացնի Դամասկոսի պաշտպանության վրա, այնքան շատ քրդերը հնարավորություն կունենան լցնել վակուումը, որը ձեւավորվել է Սիրիայի` Թուրքիայի հետ սահմանին: «Քաղաքական սխալ հաշվարկների պատճառով մենք կորցնում ենք հարցի լուծումը: Կամ էլ թուրքական կառավարությունն այնպիսի նուրբ շախմատային խաղ է կատարում, որը մենք ի վիճակի չենք հասկանալ: Եթե դա այդպես է, պատրաստ եմ ներողություն խնդրել: Եթե ոչ, ապա կշարունակեմ գոռալ, որ իմ երկիրը գտնվում է բաժանման եզրին, եւ մեղավորները պետք է պատասխանատվության ենթարկվեն»,-գրում է Բիրանդը «Hurriyet Daily News»-ում:

        Comment


        • Re: Prospects of a Kurdish state and what it means for Armenia

          KURDS SEIZE OIL-BEARING REGIONS OF SYRIA. THEIR AIM - TO SECURE EQUAL RIGHTS WITH SYRIANS, AND IDEALLY TO OBTAIN FULL AUTONOMY
          by Konstantin Volkov

          Izvestiya
          July 25 2012
          Russia

          Syria's Kurds have begun an organized advance in the northeast of
          the country, occupying cities left without government control. The
          aim is the creation of an autonomous formation along the lines of
          the one that exists in northern Iraq.

          "The central authorities are currently leaving cities in the territory
          traditionally inhabited by Kurds," Radwan Ali Badini, an activist of
          the Kurdish Liberation Movement, told Izvestiya. "And we are helping
          these population centres to create a new administration."

          According to Badini everything is happening peacefully and there are
          no clashes with the armed opposition or with the regular army.

          Furthermore the Kurds, who live along the whole length of the
          Syrian-Turkish border, regard themselves as something along the lines
          of a border guard.

          "To some extent Damascus has an interest in our presence along the
          border line, otherwise Ankara might get the idea of taking advantage
          of the unrest to enter Syria," Badini explains.

          The Kurdish movement gained strength in the 1950s when its demands
          were finally formalized as follows: the granting of broad autonomy,
          equal rights with the main population of Syria, education in the
          national language, and the right to self-determination within the
          country. Over the past year some of the demands have been met. In
          particular, Damascus granted Syrian citizenship to some of the Kurds
          and promised them autonomy.

          Nonetheless many of them still do not have the right to use their
          own language in education or in business and also they cannot build
          Kurdish schools or publish books in their native language.

          That is why they are now continuing to insist on the continued
          fulfilment of their demands, although they are also interested in
          the resolution of the Syrian conflict by peaceful means.

          At the same time, the influence of the new force is extending further
          and further. The next objective is the city of Qamishli, centre of
          Syria's oil industry.

          "If we enter it, it will be by peaceful means," Badini says. "But
          I wish to stress that the city now represents itself, there are
          interruptions to the fuel supply, and it is difficult for the
          residents, finding themselves in conditions of anarchy, to cope with
          their problems themselves."

          The emergence of a Kurdish autonomous formation is a very real
          prospect, the activist believes. All the preconditions exist to assert
          that this region will consent to nothing less. All the conditions
          currently exist for us to obtain our rights without the use of force.

          "Some of the Kurds really want democracy and the preservation of
          Syria's integrity, while some are geared to secession and full
          independence, as happened in Iraqi Kurdistan," Mahmud Khamo, member
          of the Syrian National Council, says.

          According to Khamo there are fighters active among the Kurds who
          underwent training in Iraqi camps for the training of the peshmerga
          (semi-guerrilla formations of Kurdish separatists), as well as
          activists of the Workers Party of Kurdistan (PKK).

          True, they will hardly be able to establish themselves along the
          Syrian-Turkish border; Ankara will not permit the unification of the
          Kurds living in Turkey with their Syrian fellow tribespeople. As far
          as obtaining full autonomy is concerned, not only the Bashar al-Asad
          regime but also the Syrian opposition is against this.

          "In Syria the Kurds are about 10-15 per cent, that is not enough for
          secession," Khamo suggests. "In the northeast of the country there are
          also Arabs, Armenians, Assyrians, and Chaldeans, and the Kurds do not
          form a majority, although they are the most active in political terms."

          If a referendum on secession from Syria was held they would not be
          supported, according to the Syrian National Council member. Nor will
          it happen by force; the Free Syrian Army, which is fighting against
          the al-Asad regime, will not permit separation.

          [Translated from Russian]

          Comment


          • Re: Prospects of a Kurdish state and what it means for Armenia

            The Kurds deserves to have their own country. They have been opressed for too long in this region.

            Comment


            • Re: Prospects of a Kurdish state and what it means for Armenia

              Crisis in Syria emboldens country's Kurds
              Emboldened by a country in chaos and conflict, Syria's Kurds assert their claim for autonomy, in the face of an indignant neighbouring Turkey.

              By Wyre Davies
              BBC News


              What is happening in Syria cannot be taken in isolation. The protracted upheaval in one of the Middle East's biggest, most powerful and most influential countries is affecting the entire region and, most critically, its immediate neighbours.

              Like Iraq, Jordan and Lebanon Turkey has already absorbed - almost without hesitation - thousands of Syrians fleeing the fighting, in particular from the northern cities of Hama and Aleppo.

              Turkey is understandably concerned that the number of civilians fleeing across its relatively open southern border will increase as the fighting intensifies in Syria.

              Some of those refugees also bring their own political baggage with them and there have already been disturbances in the border camps.

              Occasionally ethnic and regional tensions spill over as thousands of displaced Syrians live cheek by jowl in tents under the blisteringly hot summer sum.

              But for Turkey, the refugee issue is a mere inconvenience compared to what it thinks will be the biggest fall-out of the Syrian crisis - the Kurds and Kurdistan.

              In an almost mirror image of what happened in Iraq after 1991, Kurdish nationalists in northern Syria are making the most of the turmoil and violence in the rest of the country to strengthen their own identity and position.

              'Govern ourselves'
              For Turkey, it is like a red rag to a bull.

              As the Assad regime pulls in regular Syrian troops from peripheral areas for the military assault on Aleppo, there is clear evidence that others are almost seamlessly moving in to the vacuum left behind.

              And in some Kurdish parts of northern Syria the opposition forces of the Democratic Union Party (PYD) and other smaller factions have all but taken over.

              The leader of the PYD, Salih Muslim, spoke to the BBC in recent days about his movement's strategy and aspirations.

              "We are able to govern ourselves - we have the power for it," he said.

              Mr Muslim was careful to insist, at this stage at least, that he wasn't calling for an independent Kurdistan but an autonomous region within a new, democratic Syria.

              It is thought that Kurdish militias now control at least four main towns and cities in northern Syria. They reportedly include at least parts of Qamishlo, Efrin, Amude, Terbaspi and Ay El Arab.

              More remarkable is that although there were sporadic clashes and some loss of life many of them appear to have been secured without much of a fight.

              "We warned them to leave the Kurdish areas, otherwise we would resort to different measures," says Muslim, referring to civil administrators and officials from Damascus who used to run the towns."

              They were aware of the people's demands and that's why they gave in without blood being spilled."


              Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan sees a Kurdish enclave in Syria a direct threat to Turkey
              Erdogan's "terrorist" threat
              Quite deliberately choosing to describe the region of northern Syria as "West Kurdistan" the PYD leader said most people in the region stood with the movement and supported their aims.

              Those aims are certainly not supported by the Turkish government, which has, for decades, fought its own often bloody battles with Kurdish separatists and nationalists of the PKK - the Kurdish Workers' Party.

              In a blunt message at the end of this week, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan made it abundantly clear he saw the creation of a separate Kurdish enclave in northern Syria as a direct threat to his own country's interests and security.

              Mr Erdogan said that Ankara would not accept the creation of a "terrorist" structure in the region.

              "It is our most natural right to intervene (in northern Syria) since those terrorist formations would disturb our national peace," said the Prime Minister in a television interview.

              Turkey, a one time ally of the Assad regime in Syria for pragmatic and economic reasons as much as anything, has all but given up on Damascus.

              On more than one occasion Mr Erdogan has called on President Bashar al-Assad to stop the onslaught against his own people and to step down before more lives are lost.

              Assad handover?
              Some in Turkey also believe that a desperate President Assad has deliberately abandoned, or handed over, the northern regions to the PYD in order to create tensions with Turkey and also divide the already fractious opposition movements in Syria.


              The crisis has emboldened Syria's Kurds but some analysts say their relationship with the FSA is tense
              "In the North, (Assad) has already allocated five provinces to the terrorists (Kurds)," Mr Erdogan was quoted as saying by a Turkish news agency last week. Ankara simply regards the Syrian PYD as a branch of its own, outlawed PKK.

              But the criticism and allegations of trying to create regional instability aren't limited to the pariah that is the regime in Damascus.

              The autonomous Kurdish administration in northern Iraq has now admitted it has been training Kurdish-Syrian fighters on its territory.

              In a recent interview the regional leader, President Massoud Barzani, openly confirmed the presence of a military training camp where "a good number of young Kurds" have been trained.

              Tension with FSA
              With as many as 20million Kurds in Turkey alone, watching their brethren to the east quite literally marking out their territory, the famously nationalist Turks are, to put it mildly, concerned.

              Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davatoglu is being dispatched to northern Iraq in the coming days where, according to reports, he will talk with Kurdish officials there about the situation in Syria and Turkish "sensitivities."

              Many things are still unclear; relations between the Syrian Kurds and other opposition groups (the Free Syria Army) are said to be tense.

              In some Syrian Kurdish towns under the de-facto control of the PYD, pro Assad troops have remained in their barracks, raising questions about a deal, of sorts, between Damascus and the Kurds.

              And, the biggest question of all, will Turkey carry out its threat to intervene militarily in northern Syria to prevent the creation of a Kurdish "entity".

              One thing is certain. If and when President Assad is driven from power, the country he leaves behind will for some time be divided, damaged and violent.

              Comment


              • Re: Prospects of a Kurdish state and what it means for Armenia



                "L'orient le Jour", is the "Le Monde" of Beirut, famed to be 'serious'.
                Unfortunately, it fell in very partisan hands, for more then a decade now.
                It is controlled by Hariri, wich is a vassal of Turkey in Lebanon.
                So one must not be surprised by the approximations.
                Nevertheless, it is interesting to read the 'turkish' point of view...

                Comment


                • Re: Prospects of a Kurdish state and what it means for Armenia

                  Hurriyet, Turkey
                  July 27 2012


                  Get Over Your Kurd Phobia Already!


                  Interview by Faruk Balikci with Co-Chairman of PYD Salih Muslim in Al-Qamishlo


                  Co-Chairman of the PYD [Democratic Union Party], which is known to be
                  close to the PKK [Kurdistan People's Congress, KGK] Salih Muslim said,
                  "The Turkish rulers have a Kurd phobia. I beg of you, let them
                  overcome this phobia." A graduate from Istanbul Technical University
                  Department of Chemical Engineering, Muslim explains how he lived in
                  Istanbul for seven years: "I have Turkish friends; we have a fraternal
                  bond. Understand us. We do not want bloodshed. We are defending
                  ourselves in our region."

                  PYD Co-Chairman Salih Muslim stated that Turkey had to get over its
                  Kurd phobia and said, "Understand us correctly." Muslim stressed that
                  they were protecting themselves from the war on their borders and that
                  they wanted to avoid bloodshed. Co-Chairman of the PYD, which is known
                  to be close to the PKK, Salih Muslim explained that he completed the
                  Istanbul Technical University Department of Chemical Engineering as a
                  middling student and that he lived seven years in Istanbul.

                  We Are Protecting Ourselves

                  I was not into politics as a student. I only felt sympathy. I used to
                  look on from afar. I never felt like a stranger. I have Turkish
                  friends and good relations. I never felt any enmity. The Turkish
                  rulers have a Kurd phobia. I beg of you, let them get over it. We have
                  historical, social and fraternal bonds. What we are doing here is not
                  against anyone. We are acting simply to protect our society from the
                  war that is pressing on our borders. Tanks have entered Kobani. They
                  were going to pass through our area and hit the Arabs. The people did
                  not allow it. They resisted. We are only protecting ourselves in our
                  region. The people rose up themselves to protect their region. This is
                  their natural right.

                  Baath In Barracks, Kurds On Patrol

                  We Want To Avoid Bloodshed

                  We do not want confrontation or bloodshed. We do not have the
                  authority to make decisions by ourselves. We have been organizing the
                  people for two years and we are now getting results. We want to avoid
                  bloodshed. Nobody should be disturbed by this, least of all Turkey. We
                  are a fraternal people. If the Turkish authorities want to discuss
                  this I will speak with them. We are shouting out what it is we want: a
                  democratic regime in Syria and recognition of the Kurdish identity. We
                  want a structure in which the Arabs, the Assyrians and the Armenians
                  will also be free. Among the Kurds there are those who want autonomy,
                  an autonomous federation. But that is not our priority. We do not want
                  Al-Asad's forces or anyone else's forces here. There should have been
                  a democratic revolution in Syria, but that never happened.

                  How Did It Come To This?

                  Where Are The Kurds Currently In Control?

                  We Have No Bond With The PKK

                  We have no organic bond with the PKK. Not one armed force has crossed
                  the border. The PKK has a lot of sympathizers among the people in the
                  border region. However, we make our own decisions. The Kurd Supreme
                  Council makes the decisions. If there is foreign intervention in Syria
                  Al-Asad's Stinger missiles are pointed at Israel. In this situation
                  Israel would use chemical weapons. However, Al-Asad is going to resist
                  for a long time in order not to go.

                  Checks Along Al-Qamishlo Highway

                  Militants of the People's Defence Units (YPG) are conducting vehicle
                  and ID checks at a check point on the Derik-Al-Qamishlo highway. The
                  militants who are carrying out these checks are unarmed and are
                  organized into defence committees formed in every neighbourhood inside
                  the Kurd region. There are defence committees formed by the residents
                  in almost every neighbourhood in the Kurd region.

                  [Translated from Turkish]

                  Comment


                  • Re: Prospects of a Kurdish state and what it means for Armenia

                    Mehr News Agency (MNA), Iran
                    July 27, 2012 Friday

                    Turkey's chameleon policy toward Syria


                    TEHRAN, July 27 (MNA) -- Since the start of the political unrest in
                    Syria, Turkey has changed its policy toward its neighbor several
                    times. Initially, Turkey made efforts to maintain its strategic
                    relations with Syria, and the two countries were expected to reap the
                    benefits of a decade of cooperation. Then Turkish officials demanded
                    that the Syrian government adopt a softer stance toward the
                    opposition.

                    However, as the internal conflict intensified, Syrian refugees flooded
                    into Turkey, and Ankara began to officially criticize Damascus.
                    Currently, Turkey has allied itself with the Syrian opposition, which
                    is trying to drive President Bashar al-Assad out of power, and
                    relations between the two countries are seriously strained. Turkey's
                    ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) has adopted very unusual
                    policies toward Middle Eastern countries ever since they came to power
                    in November 2002. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan was once
                    a good friend of Muammar Gaddafi and received the Al-Gaddafi
                    International Prize for Human Rights. However, after the outbreak of
                    war in Libya, Erdogan quickly changed his stance and began calling for
                    the ouster of Gaddafi. In Egypt, he took advantage of every
                    opportunity to establish closer ties with former dictator Hosni
                    Mubarak, but when the Egyptian revolution neared victory, Erdogan
                    suddenly established warm ties with the Muslim Brotherhood. In Syria,
                    Erdogan successfully normalized Turkey's relations with its neighbor
                    in all areas, i.e., the political, economic, security, and cultural
                    spheres. However, after the escalation of the crisis in Syria, Erdogan
                    criticized Assad, saying he was stifling the democratic aspirations of
                    the Syrian people. In this criticism, Turkey aligned itself with
                    governments like Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are some of the most
                    undemocratic countries in the world. The main goal of Turkey's
                    ever-changing foreign policy is the protection of its economic
                    interests, and it has nothing to do with democratic values or freedom
                    of expression. Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, who is the
                    architect of Turkey's diplomacy, has been seriously criticized inside
                    the AKP for his failure to realize the policy of zero problems with
                    neighbors. Currently, Turkey has problems with Syria, Armenia,
                    Azerbaijan, Iran, and Iraq, and instead of attempting to extricate the
                    country from the current problematic situation, Turkey's foreign
                    policy team is only making things worse day by day. AKP leaders seem
                    to have come to the conclusion that by supporting the United States'
                    policies in the Middle East, Turkey can improve its economic and
                    political situation. However, if the U.S. fails to realize its
                    objectives in Syria, Turkey will have great difficulty maintaining its
                    position in the region. Seyyed Asadollah Athari is a senior research
                    fellow at the Institute for Middle East Strategic Studies in Tehran
                    and an expert on Turkey. MS/HG END MNA

                    Comment


                    • Re: Prospects of a Kurdish state and what it means for Armenia

                      Turkey: For Ankara, Fears of a Kurdistan Rising


                      July 30, 2012 - 9:10pm, by Yigal Schleifer The Turko-file Kurdish Issue Turkey-Syria Relations Turkish Foreign Policy
                      The continuing violence and bloodshed in Syria may be troubling, but for Ankara, the real worry right now is actually about what's happening in the place where things are quiet, across the border in Syria's Kurdish region, where the Assad regime has now ceded control to local militias as it tries to consolidate its forces in order to protect Aleppo and Damascus from rebel forces.

                      With a Kurdish autonomous region already well established in northern Iraq, a nascent Kurdish autonomous region now in Syria and with its own Kurds increasingly making autonomy part of their demands, Turkey is now confronting what has long been one of the country's biggest fears: the rise of, as columnist Mehmet Ali Birand recently put it, the "mega Kurdish state."

                      From Ankara's perspective, there's certainly a lot happening to justify these fears, particular with regards to Syria's northern Kurdish region. With the departure of Assad's forces from the area, the Kurdish-led Democratic Union Party (PYD), which is considered to be close to the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), has stepped in to fill the vacuum. In response, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan declared last week that Turkey would "intervene" in Syria should the PKK set up camp there, while the Turkish military has started moving military hardware and personnel towards the Syrian border.

                      As political analyst and Today's Zaman columnist Ihsan Dagi writes, the fears about a Kurdistan rising that are gripping Turkey are providing a major test for Ankara's efforts to forge a new path on the decades-old Kurdish problem and for its self-stated goal to support regional moves towards greater justice and democracy:

                      Almost all commentaries published in Turkish media have told the story with great concern. The prime minister and the minister of foreign affairs have stated that if it becomes necessary, Turkey will not hesitate to intervene in Syria. The opposition has started to accuse the government of idly watching the establishment of a second Kurdish entity on its borders.

                      Underlying all these reactions is the assumption that developments in favor of the Kurds in the region constitute a threat to Turkey. It is thus inferred that Turkey would prefer the Kurds being ruled by dictators like Saddam Hussein and Bashar al-Assad instead of having a say in their own future.

                      This is awkward, impossible to justify on any ethical or even practical ground. It is of course obvious that such an unethical position is the result of the security concerns of the state. Or, to put more accurately, it is due to the fact that there are demands from the Kurds of Turkey concerning their political and cultural rights. Once there is an emergence of a new entity populated by Kurds that provides the Kurds with more rights and freedoms, Turkey becomes worried that such improvements may set a “bad example” for its own Kurds. The well-being of Kurds thus is to be prevented by Turkey.

                      It is futile to try to build a future on the misfortune of the Kurds. Besides, in a world of changes towards democracy and self-government, it is unrealistic to assume that the Kurds will remain under the yoke of this or that nation or dictator. As the world transforms it is normal that the Kurds, too, are increasingly gaining their democratic rights and improving their standard of living.

                      Furthermore, the developments in northern Syria's Kurdish region are testing Ankara's newly strengthened ties with the leadership of the Kurdistan Regional Government in northern Iraq. As described in a previous post, Turkey has been working on improving its relations with the KRG and its leader, Massoud Barzani, for economic reasons but also in the hope that by drawing Barzani closer and providing him with a route to ship his region's oil and gas westward, Ankara will be able to enlist his help in its efforts to shape the future of the Kurdish issue, which would include assisting in sidelining the PKK by reducing its freedom to operate. But it appears that Ankara was caught completely by surprise when it turned out that Barzani helped broker a deal between the various factions in the Kurdish area of Syria that effectively gave the PKK-friendly PYD control over large parts of that region.

                      Turkish policymakers should not have been surprised. Barzani -- correctly reading that the "Arab spring" could easily turn into a Kurdish one -- for some time now has been working to set himself up a kind of Kurdish paterfamilias who can help bring his people closer towards independence (and perhaps not just in northern Iraq). Here's what he had to say to Al Jazeera's Jane Arraf in a wide-ranging and telling interview that was posted online today:

                      JA: You've been such an essential part of the history of not just the Kurdish region, but the Kurdish people regionally. How would you like your legacy to be seen?

                      MB: I have a clear conscience as I have done whatever I have been able to do for the sake of our people. From my childhood, I have done everything to free our people, to liberate our land. The judgment will be left to the people.

                      JA: Is the region ready for an independent Kurdistan?

                      MB: It's a natural right of the people. But when and how it will be ready is a different question.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X