Which Media outlet is allowed to read??

[Eddo211]

Re: Which Media outlet is allowed to read??

Some here, decided and defend, the idea that any media financed by the West, or supposed to, is automatically irrelevant or slanderous, and automatically, any argument their pages may present, are irrelevant, since their pages are financed by the West...

I personally believe, that the question is not senseless, as long as the rule is for every argument/point of view.
Why a Russian financed media is more credible, than a Western financed one??
From an armenian point of view, I do not see the difference, unless I accept, that we are already willingly russians...

And even more, even if a media is financed by "Armenian" sources, it is important to see, what kind of armenian finances are there??

As my point of view: Discuss and counter the arguments, the thesis, the facts that are present in every single article posted (CONTENT), rather than slander it using doubtful demonstrations based on the Media it is published in, and ONLY that (CONTAINER) seems not accepted, I propose every such bright mind the following in this thread:

1°/ Propose you 'Trust Worthy' source of Information (CONTAINER), not forgetting to mention its financial sources.

2°/ If you were a genuine Armenian Nationalist/Patriot, and you were against the policy of your government, considering its policy counter to the National Interests: IN WICH MEDIA WOULD YOU PUBLISH YOUR ARTICLE? i.e: Would that Media publish You???

If they don't like your point of view the easiest way to discredit you is to attack your source....I see this all over the internet.
Vrej you should not let that discourage you.

With that said all media are biased to certain degree be it their protocols, sponsors, ratings, etc......they also make alot of mistakes on dates, names, type of aircraft or weapon...

I am glad that Hyclub news here is being covered more balanced by the members compared to say 5 years ago when it was all pro Russian.

[Vrej1915]

Re: Which Media outlet is allowed to read??

I normally try to read from all sources, even ones I don't trust, and then come up with my own conclusion.

Of course, that's what makes sense most..... , but You are not one of the "censors".
I would like to have their sources and arguments for....

[Eddo211]

Re: Which Media outlet is allowed to read??

I normally try to read from all sources, even ones I don't trust, and then come up with my own conclusion.

[Vrej1915]

Re: Which Media outlet is allowed to read??

"From an armenian point of view, I do not see the difference, "
Then why do you quote nothing but Lragir propaganda?

Dear,
Why shouldn't I ???

I guess, as always, you never read the posts to their end............, or do not understand what you read?
Or else, my english is as bad, as your armenian

1°/ Propose your 'Trust Worthy' source of Information (CONTAINER), not forgetting to mention its financial sources.

2°/ If you were a genuine Armenian Nationalist/Patriot, and you were against the policy of your government, considering its policy counter to the National Interests: IN WICH MEDIA WOULD YOU PUBLISH YOUR ARTICLE? i.e: Would that Media publish You???

You do not like Lragir.
Perfect!
Then go on, end up reading the post, and for once, try to answer to the points, not turn again the same old disc time and time again......

[Haykakan]

Re: Which Media outlet is allowed to read??

"From an armenian point of view, I do not see the difference, "
Then why do you quote nothing but Lragir propaganda?

[Mher]

Re: Which Media outlet is allowed to read??

Why a Russian financed media is more credible, than a Western financed one??

And even more, even if a media is financed by "Armenian" sources, it is important to see, what kind of armenian finances are there??

excellent points

[Vrej1915]

Some here, decided and defend, the idea that any media financed by the West, or supposed to, is automatically irrelevant or slanderous, and automatically, any argument their pages may present, are irrelevant, since their pages are financed by the West...

I personally believe, that the question is not senseless, as long as the rule is for every argument/point of view.
Why a Russian financed media is more credible, than a Western financed one??
From an armenian point of view, I do not see the difference, unless I accept, that we are already willingly russians...

And even more, even if a media is financed by "Armenian" sources, it is important to see, what kind of armenian finances are there??

As my point of view: Discuss and counter the arguments, the thesis, the facts that are present in every single article posted (CONTENT), rather than slander it using doubtful demonstrations based on the Media it is published in, and ONLY that (CONTAINER) seems not accepted, I propose every such bright mind the following in this thread:

1°/ Propose your 'Trust Worthy' source of Information (CONTAINER), not forgetting to mention its financial sources.

2°/ If you were a genuine Armenian Nationalist/Patriot, and you were against the policy of your government, considering its policy counter to the National Interests: IN WICH MEDIA WOULD YOU PUBLISH YOUR ARTICLE? i.e: Would that Media publish You???