Well, I disagree with Lenin on virtually everything.
The quote is true, it is only obvious, and it doesn't take a Lenin to come up with that quote to see what people want.
It is interesting to note that in my historical materialism class, our professor is covering the transition from feudalism to capitalism, and if left to people, they would not want to change given the social property relations.
As a result he concludes, just like Ludwig von Mises, that history is a result of unintended consequences.
The nation-state is an artificial entity. The people and culture are real, but the nation-state itself is a very recent creation. It is because of the nation-state, that boundaries started to matter, and the illusion of the boundary lines would ignite wars, not just in Armenia, but in the whole world.
Nation-states imply fixed and unchanging boundaries, whereas the past is nothing but changing boundaries.
The quote is true, it is only obvious, and it doesn't take a Lenin to come up with that quote to see what people want.
It is interesting to note that in my historical materialism class, our professor is covering the transition from feudalism to capitalism, and if left to people, they would not want to change given the social property relations.
As a result he concludes, just like Ludwig von Mises, that history is a result of unintended consequences.
The nation-state is an artificial entity. The people and culture are real, but the nation-state itself is a very recent creation. It is because of the nation-state, that boundaries started to matter, and the illusion of the boundary lines would ignite wars, not just in Armenia, but in the whole world.
Nation-states imply fixed and unchanging boundaries, whereas the past is nothing but changing boundaries.
Comment