Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

[Կարմիր Բ]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

Axel is one of those guys who finds Western influence to Armenia catastrophic while he finds Middle East a cozy peaceful place. Perhaps Axel should depart to the M.E. to.. keep his Armenianess which is under attack by the ''West'' (which btw provides him his computer)

[TomServo]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

Perhaps Axel should depart to the M.E. to.. keep his Armenianess which is under attack by the ''West'' (which btw provides him his computer)

More like the M.E. is under attack by the West.

[axel]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

the ''West'' (which btw provides him his computer)

The "West" may have provided you with a computer but it failed to provide you with a brain.

[Armenian]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

The "West" may have provided you with a computer but it failed to provide you with a brain.

That's why he needs a computer

[Lucin]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

Apparently, you do not have a "noble" skin either... So don't flatter yourself Miss Ego. And if you care to know, I had never seen a bully individual as vile, aggressive, confused, stern, self-rightous and judgmental with a warped mind as you...

There is no internal argument really, just immunity to idiocity.

So stick to the topic and tell us why is France so catastrophic for Armenia.

Quiet you, and stop distorting what is said (like Siamanto). No, France has never been catastrophic to Armenia, however, your kind has been.

[Siamanto]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

Apparently, you do not have a "noble" skin either... So don't flatter yourself Miss Ego. And if you care to know, I had never seen a bully individual as vile, aggressive, confused, stern, self-rightous and judgmental with a warped mind as you...

Quiet you, and stop distorting what is said (like Siamanto). No, France has never been catastrophic to Armenia, however, your kind has been.

It is amusing to see someone who, only in post #56 above, lacked the modesty to admit her role in a situation; hypocritically, call a person, who has explicitly and spontaneously admitted participation, "Miss Ego."

It is amusing to see someone who, only in post #66 above, blatantly and childishly lied - again, to protect her overblown ego - to falsely accuse another of distortion.

Amusing, but not surprising because that is the nature of hypocrites and liars; however, the situation becomes sadly laughable when the persons lacks the patience to wait a bit and does it only a couple of posts away. Compulsive behavior? Hysteria? Lack of intelligence? Overblown ego?


P.S. LOL By the way, I love the "Quiet you." It fits you so well!

[Կարմիր Բ]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

Quiet you, and stop distorting what is said (like Siamanto). No, France has never been catastrophic to Armenia, however, your kind has been.

Answer the question woman.

[Կարմիր Բ]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

The "West" may have provided you with a computer but it failed to provide you with a brain.

That is why we are eagerly waiting from you to enlighten us monsieur Axel!

[Armenian]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

France warning of war with Iran



French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner says the world should prepare for war over Iran's nuclear programme. "We have to prepare for the worst, and the worst is war," Mr Kouchner said in an interview on French TV and radio.

He was speaking ahead of a visit to Russia on Monday, during which Iran is likely to feature prominently. Iran's nuclear programme will also be one of the main issues for the UN nuclear watchdog's annual conference, starting in Vienna on Monday. Iran denies it is trying to acquire nuclear weapons, and says it only wants nuclear power to generate electricity for civilian purposes. But it has repeatedly rejected UN demands to give up the enrichment of uranium, which the US and other Western states fear is being diverted to a nuclear weapons project.

Tougher approach

Mr Kouchner said negotiations with Iran should continue "right to the end", but that an Iranian nuclear weapon would pose "a real danger for the whole world". He said a number of large French companies had been asked not to tender for business in Iran. "We are not banning French companies from submitting. We have advised them not to. These are private companies." "But I think that it has been heard and we are not the only ones to have done this."

Mr Kouchner will seek agreement with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov over tighter UN sanctions to try to force Iran to give up enrichment, the French foreign ministry says. Russia has a UN Security Council veto over any new sanctions, and its support is seen as vital for any new approach. It also has perhaps the greatest leverage over Tehran, as the supplier of fuel for its nuclear reactor. But Mr Kouchner said even in the absence of UN action, the European Union should prepare its own sanctions against Iran. "We have decided while negotiations are continuing, to prepare eventual sanctions outside the ambit of UN sanctions. Our good friends, the Germans, suggested that," he said.

'Playing for time'

Iran has warned that any new punishments could push it to stop co-operating with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The IAEA's members meet this week in Austria, with Iran likely to top the agenda. The director of the organisation, Mohamed ElBaradei, has been criticised in the West over a new deal with Iran to clear up questions about its past nuclear activities. The US and its allies believe the deal just gives Iran more time, during which they fear it will advance its nuclear programme. Since becoming foreign minister earlier this year, Mr Kouchner has not shied away from controversy. Last month he was quoted as saying the Iraqi government was "not functioning" and seemed to hint that Prime Minister Nouri Maliki should resign, provoking an angry reaction from Baghdad.

The BBC's diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus says France has changed its approach to world affairs under its new President Nicolas Sarkozy, adopting a harder line on several issues, and seeking to improve relations with the United States. But it is the tougher rhetoric aimed at Tehran which will please Washington the most, he says. Until now the UN Security Council has imposed economic sanctions on Iran, but did not allow for military action. The United States has not ruled out a military attack against Iran to prevent it from acquiring a nuclear weapon.

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6997935.stm

[Siamanto]

Re: Sarkozy - Friend or Foe?

France warning of war with Iran

French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner says the world should prepare for war over Iran's nuclear programme. "We have to prepare for the worst, and the worst is war," Mr Kouchner said in an interview on French TV and radio.

He was speaking ahead of a visit to Russia on Monday, during which Iran is likely to feature prominently. Iran's nuclear programme will also be one of the main issues for the UN nuclear watchdog's annual conference, starting in Vienna on Monday. Iran denies it is trying to acquire nuclear weapons, and says it only wants nuclear power to generate electricity for civilian purposes. But it has repeatedly rejected UN demands to give up the enrichment of uranium, which the US and other Western states fear is being diverted to a nuclear weapons project.

Tougher approach

Mr Kouchner said negotiations with Iran should continue "right to the end", but that an Iranian nuclear weapon would pose "a real danger for the whole world". He said a number of large French companies had been asked not to tender for business in Iran. "We are not banning French companies from submitting. We have advised them not to. These are private companies." "But I think that it has been heard and we are not the only ones to have done this."

Mr Kouchner will seek agreement with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov over tighter UN sanctions to try to force Iran to give up enrichment, the French foreign ministry says. Russia has a UN Security Council veto over any new sanctions, and its support is seen as vital for any new approach. It also has perhaps the greatest leverage over Tehran, as the supplier of fuel for its nuclear reactor. But Mr Kouchner said even in the absence of UN action, the European Union should prepare its own sanctions against Iran. "We have decided while negotiations are continuing, to prepare eventual sanctions outside the ambit of UN sanctions. Our good friends, the Germans, suggested that," he said.

'Playing for time'

Iran has warned that any new punishments could push it to stop co-operating with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The IAEA's members meet this week in Austria, with Iran likely to top the agenda. The director of the organisation, Mohamed ElBaradei, has been criticised in the West over a new deal with Iran to clear up questions about its past nuclear activities. The US and its allies believe the deal just gives Iran more time, during which they fear it will advance its nuclear programme. Since becoming foreign minister earlier this year, Mr Kouchner has not shied away from controversy. Last month he was quoted as saying the Iraqi government was "not functioning" and seemed to hint that Prime Minister Nouri Maliki should resign, provoking an angry reaction from Baghdad.

The BBC's diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus says France has changed its approach to world affairs under its new President Nicolas Sarkozy, adopting a harder line on several issues, and seeking to improve relations with the United States. But it is the tougher rhetoric aimed at Tehran which will please Washington the most, he says. Until now the UN Security Council has imposed economic sanctions on Iran, but did not allow for military action. The United States has not ruled out a military attack against Iran to prevent it from acquiring a nuclear weapon.

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6997935.stm

"Genius," would you please tell us how does the above makes Sarkozy a foe of the Armenians?
The naiveté of your understanding of International Affairs is at best laughable.

Another conclusion based on that black and white model that you "trailer thrashes," skinheads and other psychotic bullies use when "analyzing" International Politics?

Or is it part of your continuous manipulation of opinions and emotions with sensationalistic news?