Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Are some Jews descendants of Armenians?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Armenian
    Oh, I almost forgot.

    The stupid article you posted is nothing but racist psychobabble that isn't even worth the paper it is written on.

    Let us see how far you will get in life believing in ugly fairytales.
    Freudian slip?
    You mean the excerpts above? They pretty much state the same garbage you spouted in this thread. You are right though, they are fairytales.

    What exactly is your problem with racialists(non-supremacist)?

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Anonymouse
      "Armenid".

      What is this hogwash? There is no such thing as Armenid or Armenoid.
      I agree Arman. The types commonly referred to by the above designations are simply mongrelized bastards and not a distinct subrace.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by -Pyunik-
        I know an Italian who has a uni/monobrow, he used to get teased because of it and then one day he came to school and he had no more mono-brow. (Turns out he shaved it. LMAO.)
        Anyway, according to your logic he is not european?
        Italy, like Spain, contains a composite of racial types. The southern part of Italy has a darker complexion because at one time the Moors ruled Sicily and souther parts of Italy, and that would explain while some Italians look more Mediterranean, resemling some Arabs or Armenians. The northern part of Italy was conquered by a Germanic tribe called the Lombards who had light hair and light eyes and when you go to northern Italy you will see a stark contrast from southern Italy. In other words, the effects of racial mixing destroyed the original Romans who created the Roman empire and where replaced by different peoples. Northern Italy is also where the Renaissance began, and to anyone who believes that races and the degree of purity do not matter, then they do not need to be bothered with. Spain likewise was occupied by the Moors, but then reconquered by the Gothic descendents found in Ferdinand and Isabella.
        Achkerov kute.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by -Pyunik-
          I know an Italian who has a uni/monobrow, he used to get teased because of it and then one day he came to school and he had no more mono-brow. (Turns out he shaved it. LMAO.)
          Anyway, according to your logic he is not european?
          Yeap. Most likely a saracen/moor leftover...
          Although if that's the only non-White feature he may be assimilable.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Anonymouse
            Italy, like Spain, contains a composite of racial types. The southern part of Italy has a darker complexion because at one time the Moors ruled Sicily and souther parts of Italy, and that would explain while some Italians look more Mediterranean, resemling some Arabs or Armenians. The northern part of Italy was conquered by a Germanic tribe called the Lombards who had light hair and light eyes and when you go to northern Italy you will see a stark contrast from southern Italy. In other words, the effects of racial mixing destroyed the original Romans who created the Roman empire and where replaced by different peoples. Northern Italy is also where the Renaissance began, and to anyone who believes that races and the degree of purity do not matter, then they do not need to be bothered with. Spain likewise was occupied by the Moors, but then reconquered by the Gothic descendents found in Ferdinand and Isabella.

            BRAVISSIMO!!!
            There are many Roman types though in Central Italy, although not as many as there should be
            Still the overwhelming majority of Italians are White, including Sicillians.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Tigranes
              Tigranes is most likely the proper name while Tigran is just a Persianized version

              You are asking me questions when you already know my responses.

              I have no problems with the racial types common among the non-IE Etruscans, Minoans, Hurro-Urartians etc. Nor do I have a problem with the phenotypes of South Brits, French, Spaniards or any other European people with a prominent or a convex nose. Hell most classic Roman Emperors had a convex nose so did most rulers of the Hittites.
              I have a pretty prominent nose myself.

              Nevertheless, I do not consider anyone with a hook nose (quite different from a convex "Roman" nose), fat lips, unibrows and so on to be Armenian or any other IE or Europoid person. Examples: Aram Khachatryan or Frunzik Mkrtchyan. They don't have to be jewish mongrels, they can be iranian, arab, hindu etc. mongrels.
              Maybe this is new to you but Tigran IS A PERSIAN NAME!!!

              Thank God you don’t have any "problems with the racial types types common among the non-IE Etruscans, Minoans, Hurro-Urartians etc." And thank God that you do not "have a problem with the phenotypes of South Brits, French, Spaniards or any other European people with a prominent or a convex nose." And thank God that you have realized that "most classic Roman Emperors had a convex nose so did most rulers of the Hittites."

              And a million thanks to God that you "have a pretty prominent nose" as well.

              You see, I have a very small and straight nose - a very sexy one if I may add. Thus, henceforth, I reserve the right to bring up your biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig nose every time you piss me off.

              Nevertheless, I agree that the term "hooked nose" is a bad description and does not apply to "prominent" or "curved" Armenian, Greco-Roman and/or Hittite noses. The "fat lips" part I fully agree with you. And I do agree with you that Aram Khachatryan and Frunzik Mkrtchyan (and don’t forget Paruir Sevak) do not represent the typical Armenian phenotype. Nevertheless, that is irrelevant to me because these were great men and need to be respected by all Armenians.

              Nevertheless, don’t you F*** with the uni-browed Armenians!!!

              Hell, we are a vast majority (specially when you include in the count those who pluck as well). Heck, even most southern Europeans have unibrows. Having unibrows, along with having abundant body hair and prominent noses is unique to the ancient Anatolian landscape and has nothing to do with being mongrels.

              You see Herr Tigran, you were sounding smart until you made that stupid "unibrow" comment. Again, you have just gone way over board with your racist obsession.
              Մեր ժողովուրդն արանց հայրենասիրութեան այն է, ինչ որ մի մարմին' առանց հոգու:

              Նժդեհ


              Please visit me at my Heralding the Rise of Russia blog: http://theriseofrussia.blogspot.com/

              Comment


              • #17
                Wow, looky looky, all these "racialists" trying to find expression on a forum.

                Perhaps I can refer the readers to the former thread we had about race, which was sadly closed due to some anti-intellectual currents.

                Achkerov kute.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Armenian
                  Maybe this is new to you but Tigran IS A PERSIAN NAME!!!
                  Hahaha.
                  True
                  I can't believe you admitted that though.

                  You see, I have a very small and straight nose - a very sexy one if I may add. Thus, henceforth, I reserve the right to bring up your biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig nose every time you piss me off.
                  It's not big, it's just prominent and extremely sexy and very straight

                  Nevertheless, I agree that the term "hooked nose" is a bad description and does not apply to "prominent" or "curved" Armenian, Greco-Roman and/or Hittite noses. The "fat lips" part I fully agree with you. And I do agree with you that Aram Khachatryan and Frunzik Mkrtchyan (and don’t forget Paruir Sevak) do not represent the typical Armenian phenotype. Nevertheless, that is irrelevant to me because these were great men and need to be respected by all Armenians.
                  Well aren't you full of surprises?

                  Nevertheless, don’t you F*** with the uni-browed Armenians!!!

                  Hell, we are a vast majority (specially when you include in the count those who pluck as well). Heck, even most southern Europeans have unibrows. Having unibrows, along with having abundant body hair and prominent noses is unique to the ancient Anatolian landscape and has nothing to do with being mongrels.
                  To each their own I guess.

                  You see Herr Tigran, you were sounding smart until you made that stupid "unibrow" comment. Again, you have just gone way over board with your racist obsession.
                  Boo hooo.
                  I'm a RACIST!!!! Capiche? Attempting to insult me by calling me a racist is laughable.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Tigranes
                    I agree Arman. The types commonly referred to by the above designations are simply mongrelized bastards and not a distinct subrace.
                    By the way, who are you and how do you know my name?
                    Achkerov kute.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Anonymouse
                      By the way, who are you and how do you know my name?

                      We don't know eachother. I just saw others calling you Arman here...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X