If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
hmm....
Actually not being a virgin is not that much different than being one. In my opinion that is, i mean the only difference is, that you see a guy naked, and them you make love to him, and enjoy your partner, i don't know how showing physical affection to the person you love should be a way of defining your purity. I mean c'mon if you are a xxxxx, then you will be īthat no matter what. Yes it's true that guys like their girls as virgins, but i think the issue here is, that guys dread to be the ones that are unexperienced and have to match up to the previous partners of a girl.
i don't know how showing physical affection to the person you love should be a way of defining your purity. I mean c'mon if you are a xxxxx, then you will be īthat no matter what.
The realistic question is not virginity - but the extent of the lack of virginity. It's hard for me to believe that someone (male or female) who has had had a great many sexual partners in the past can sincerely equate sexual intercourse as a way of showing their love for someone.
The realistic question is not virginity - but the extent of the lack of virginity. It's hard for me to believe that someone (male or female) who has had had a great many sexual partners in the past can sincerely equate sexual intercourse as a way of showing their love for someone.
I can see where youre coming from, i mean personally i wouldn't mind marrying a guy that has had 1 or two partners in the past, but ofcourse if you hang out with someone who's seen more boobs than a doctor, it might get a bit vulgar and sort of pointless to think that you would seem more special to this person in some way.
Comment