Some rambling

[Anonymouse]

Re: Armenian Terrorists!

If he has something against the Armenian communists of the past then yes I do have something against him. That's why I posted a comment in that thread and that was the end of it. In this thread he was the one who started attacking me because I told an imposter (armoblog) not to desecrate the memory of our heroes.

I did not attack you. I told you to stop attacking others. Why do you presume that warning you to not threaten another for their views as attacking you. If you cannot follow the rules and threaten people for daring to state a differing you, you do not belong here or anywhere. You cannot tolerate or accept differing views, and it is no wonder you are a lover of the Communists, who, much like you, were authoritarian hacks who did nothing more than stifle criticism and dissent.

[Armenian]

Re: Armenian Terrorists!

I think you need to take a break for a while and cool off.

Anon, I hope Gazan comes back soon.

Needless to say, we need his type here. This board is full of Otaramols, J-e-w lovers, Wiggers, and tree hugging hippies.

We need Armenian Nationalists here - badly.

[MrLeftyHye]

Re: Armenian Terrorists!

Are you serious Armenian?

[Fedayeen]

Re: Armenian Terrorists!

Why ban Gazan??? just an argument...jeez

[MrLeftyHye]

Re: Armenian Terrorists!

Why ban Gazan??? just an argument...jeez

Because he is badmouthing the Mod.

[Siamanto]

Re: Armenian Terrorists!

Iyou guys were so hard and jugmental on armoblog. By one post you made him a traitor.

Dear Lucin,
I have seen armoblog delete from his blog any comment - including mine - that either suggested an opinion that is not in line with his/her agenda or includes references - such as books - where the reader can learn about the Armenian freedom fighters.
I don't think that his intent is to inform, it is to misinform. Isn't misinformation a form of terrorism that fits the impostor?
You may be right: (s)he's probably not a traitor if not an Armenian!

Why ban Gazan??? just an argument...jeez

An honest question: "Is banning - or can banning become - a form of terrorism?"

What saddens me most is that, year after year, I have watched honest and sincere Armenians being banned from Armenian forums for being harsh toward *urks while the same *urks continued to humiliate, bash and insult Armenians. Is that wise?

Of course, I think that Gazan should have focused on unmasking armoblog instead of antagonizing Anonymouse...and Anonymouse - ironic, isn't it? - could have kept in mind how himself was isolated and attacked by the Mods of another Armenian forum for being "harsh" toward a *urkish forum member.



Note: I have chosen to auto censor the words "*urk," "*urkish" or *urkic" because it is commonly perceived as unpleasant and offending, evokes unpleasant emotions and imagery and is pregnant with immoral and evil connotations

[Siamanto]

Re: Armenian Terrorists!

They targeted and killed civilians (yes, politicians are civilians). It's not like these people were casualties during a military engagement (so no, you cannot really compare them to American forces in Iraq).

You are absolutely right, individuals who willingly travel thousands of miles in order to destroy a country, loot its wealth and hatefully kill civilians should not be called "terrorists;" often, terrorists are insurgents against oppression, while the Australian, British and US soldiers are simply hideous and despicable criminals.

[Siamanto]

Re: Armenian Terrorists!

Because he is badmouthing the Mod.

So it is acceptable to badmouth the Armenians, but not a Mod?

[Siamanto]

Re: Armenian Terrorists!

Hi guys,

I just finished putting the finishing touches on my latest entry:

Cheers!

Isn't against forum rules to advertise? Shouldn't the quoted post be deleted?

[Anonymouse]

Re: Armenian Terrorists!

Isn't against forum rules to advertise? Shouldn't the quoted post be deleted?

Yes, and you should stop spamming the same crap everywhere as well.