Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

"Azeri" barbarians are destroying what's left of the ancient Jugha cemetery

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Historic Graveyard Is Victim Of War

    Azerbaijan is being blamed for the destruction of a unique cemetery.

    A MEDIEVAL cemetery regarded as one of the wonders of the Caucasus has been erased from the Earth in an act of cultural vandalism likened to the Taleban blowing up the Bamiyan Buddhas in Afghanistan in 2001.

    The Jugha cemetery was a unique collection of several thousand carved stone crosses on Azerbaijan’s southern border with Iran. But after 18 years of conflict between Azerbaijan and its western neighbour, Armenia, it has been confirmed that the cemetery has vanished. The Institute for War and Peace Reporting, a London-based non-governmental organisation that supports independent journalism, said that one of its staff had recently been to the highly restricted site.

    Where once stood between 2,700 and 10,000 intricately carved headstones —

    khachkars — dating from the 9th to the 16th centuries, there was only a dry patch of earth, said the institute (http://www.iwpr.net) ). It was the first independent confirmation of what Armenia has long alleged — that Azerbaijani authorities have razed the cemetery since the two former Soviet republics began a bloody border war in 1988.

    The war ended in a ceasefire in 1994, with 30,000 dead and a million displaced, but still simmers over the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh, which is held by Armenia but internationally recognised as Azerbaijan. Foreign organisations had been unable to visit the cemetery because it is in Nakhichevan, a tiny enclave of Azerbaijan cut off by Armenia and Iran and accessible only by air.

    Azerbaijan has repeatedly dismissed Armenia’s allegations as scaremongering and in turn accused Armenia of destroying hundreds of Muslim sites. President Aliyev of Azerbaijan angrily dismissed reports about the cemetery’s destruction as "a lie and a provocation" last week.

    The institute’s revelation now threatens to embarrass him and further cloud the prospects for a lasting peace with Armenia.

    Vartan Oskanian, the Armenian Foreign Minister, welcomed the report. "The irony is that this destruction has taken place not during a time of war but at a time of peace," he told The Times. There has been clear intent by the Azerbaijanis to eliminate all evidence of Armenian presence on those lands. To do that, unspeakable, irreversible destruction has been wrought and 10,000 tombstones which hold immense religious and artistic significance are simply gone."

    Tahir Tagizade, a spokesman for the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry, said that there had never been an Armenian cemetery or any other Armenian cultural relics in the area visited by the institute. "As a multi- ethnic society, we are proud of our diverse cultural heritage," he said. "I don’t see any reason for destroying Armenian property, even though we are at war with the Armenians."

    The report comes as a European Parliament delegation is visiting both countries to look into allegations of attacks on cultural sites. It had hoped to visit the Jugha site, but has yet to be granted permission. Unesco said that it was also ready to send a fact-finding mission but needed permission from the Azeri and Armenian governments. The institute said that there was now a village of about 500 people by the cemetery site. Some of those there said it had been destroyed much earlier, while others disputed that it was Armenian.

    The report quoted two witnesses as saying that the cemetery had been deliberately destroyed between 1989 and 2002. Argam Aivazian, the leading expert on Armenian monuments in Nakhichevan, said that Jugha had been the largest Armenian cemetery in existence, and a unique example of medieval art. "On the entire territory of Nakhichevan there existed 27,000 monasteries, churches, khachkars, tombstones and other Armenian monuments," he said.

    They were mostly intact when he visited in 1987. "Today they have all been destroyed."

    By Jeremy Page in Moscow; The Times April 21, 2006
    "All truth passes through three stages:
    First, it is ridiculed;
    Second, it is violently opposed; and
    Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

    Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

    Comment


    • Bell-the-cat is the only one who is being realistic, the rest I see as wishy-washy. Even if UNESCO or whoever sends people there, what are they exactly going to do about it, tell them to put it all back? Dream on! If they were truly concerned, they would have done something about it instead of playing games and pretending to care and still pretending even after the damage has already been done. Anything they can or will do now would be too little too late and they knew this right from the start.

      Comment


      • I'm begining to suspect that the creation of that IWPR report is part of a deliberate ploy by international bodies (UNESCO / ICOMOS / PACE etc.) to create an excuse for themselves to continue to not do anything.
        They will say "since we now have reports that it has been destroyed, there is no point in us going to investigate". But, as I have pointed out, the IWPR report is a worse than useless document since those who wrote it never actually went to the site of the graveyard. The report also gives Azerbaijan so many "get out" excuses that Azerbaijan may also have been involved in its writing. If UNESCO does use it as reason to not insist on its investigators going to Julfa then we will know that Azerbaijan certainly was involved in its writing. Though the area visited was not that of the graveyard, it was still a military area that would have required the Azeri army to give the reporter permission to enter.

        Probably those international bodies have the expectation that if things drag out for long enough, the whole issue will just get forgotten and buried.

        There is supposed to be a meeting at the end of May with the director-general of UNESCO for the purpose of discussing the destruction of the graveyard, but I doubt if it will happen.
        Plenipotentiary meow!

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Heat
          Bell-the-cat is the only one who is being realistic, the rest I see as wishy-washy. Even if UNESCO or whoever sends people there, what are they exactly going to do about it, tell them to put it all back? Dream on! If they were truly concerned, they would have done something about it instead of playing games and pretending to care and still pretending even after the damage has already been done. Anything they can or will do now would be too little too late and they knew this right from the start.
          The Armenians should have crossed the border one night, before the destruction of course, and should have smeared oil on the khachkars, that way the Western xxxxxxs would not let Azgarbageland destroy the cemetery...
          Four things denialist Turks do when they are confronted with facts:

          I. They change the subject [SIZE="1"](e.g. they copy/paste tons of garbage to divert attention).[/SIZE]
          II. They project [SIZE="1"](e.g. they replace "Turk" with "Armenian" and vice versa and they regurgitate Armenian history).[/SIZE]
          III. They offend [SIZE="1"](e.g. they cuss, threaten and/or mock).[/SIZE]
          IV. They shut up and say nothing.

          [URL="http://b.imagehost.org/download/0689/azerbaijan-real-fake-absurd.pdf"][COLOR="Red"]A country named Azerbaijan north of the Arax River [B]NEVER[/B] existed before 1918[/COLOR][/URL]

          Comment


          • From a legal point of view what can Armenia do against Azerbaijan? This is of course remembering they are technically still at war (cease fire)?

            Comment


            • Legal

              Originally posted by Bulgarian
              From a legal point of view what can Armenia do against Azerbaijan? This is of course remembering they are technically still at war (cease fire)?
              From a legal point of view, "Azerbaijan" has not the right to steal the name of a region in northwest Iran to call its bogus state.

              From a legal point of view, the Moscow/Kars treaty according to which Artsakh and Nakhijevan were illegally given to "Azerbaijan" (along with Kars, Ardahan, Ardvin, Surmalu given to Turkey) in 1921 after a copulation between the Jew-Tatar Kemal and the Jew-Tatar Lenin, without asking the opinion of the Armenians, is void and good for toilet paper.

              From a legal point of view, the treaty of Lausanne, where no Armenia or Armenians are mentioned is also void.

              From a legal point of view, "Azerbaijan" is artificially created on mainly Armenian territory, thus, it's an illegal entity or better said: a nonentity.

              From a legal point of view, the people of Artsakh decided to secede from Azgarbageland According to Soviet law. They legally demanded to be independent and they voted for it in that era.

              From a legal point of view, Artsakh has NEVER been a part of independent Azgarbageland.

              From a legal point of view, Azgarbageland started the war. The present situation is the consequence of their actions, not the fault of the Armenians.

              From a legal point of view, the genocidal acts in Sumgait, Baku, Gandzak, Maragha, etc. are punishable by law.

              From a legal point of view, the destruction of about 27,000 Armenian monuments: stone-crosses, cemeteries, churches, monasteries in Nakhijevan ONLY and in the last ten years, is punishable by law.

              It's only a matter of who applies the law in this world of Zionist/Freemason xxxxxxery, where a Swastika sprayed on a contemporary Jewish tombstone with little or no artistic value, will get at least 48 hours of media coverage with cries of "anti-Semites! Nazis! Auschwitz! Hitler!" but the destruction of thousands of centuries old Armenian Khachkars will go completely "unnoticed" by the Zionist media.

              It's just like telling the "Azeris":
              "Do whatever you like with the Armenians, we will encourage you, we'll invite your "president" to the White House and we will give him head", while they will declare the legally elected Lukashenko Hitler.

              They will illegally use the media to shamelessly regurgitate all the lies and "Azeri" myths to the world.

              That's what can be done from a legal point of view.
              Four things denialist Turks do when they are confronted with facts:

              I. They change the subject [SIZE="1"](e.g. they copy/paste tons of garbage to divert attention).[/SIZE]
              II. They project [SIZE="1"](e.g. they replace "Turk" with "Armenian" and vice versa and they regurgitate Armenian history).[/SIZE]
              III. They offend [SIZE="1"](e.g. they cuss, threaten and/or mock).[/SIZE]
              IV. They shut up and say nothing.

              [URL="http://b.imagehost.org/download/0689/azerbaijan-real-fake-absurd.pdf"][COLOR="Red"]A country named Azerbaijan north of the Arax River [B]NEVER[/B] existed before 1918[/COLOR][/URL]

              Comment


              • Julfa!

                "All truth passes through three stages:
                First, it is ridiculed;
                Second, it is violently opposed; and
                Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

                Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

                Comment


                • Great Brochure Gavur, thanks for posting that.

                  So, why aren't we doing more to have UN expell Azerbaijan for violation of its member requirements...?

                  Comment


                  • Have you read anyting about Armenian history other then Turks version?
                    If your Ataturk was so respectfull of nations why did he De-Armenianized and De-minoritized the new Republic so effectively?
                    Thanks to him my maternal Grandfather didnt have a job under his rule because he passed a law where Christians not to be hired for any job only Muslims.Another words after Kemal took power Armenians were not allowed to work unless they had their own busines.
                    "All truth passes through three stages:
                    First, it is ridiculed;
                    Second, it is violently opposed; and
                    Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

                    Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Gavur
                      Have you read anyting about Armenian history other then Turks version?
                      If your Ataturk was so respectfull of nations why did he De-Armenianized and De-minoritized the new Republic so effectively?
                      Thanks to him my maternal Grandfather didnt have a job under his rule because he passed a law where Christians not to be hired for any job only Muslims.Another words after Kemal took power Armenians were not allowed to work unless they had their own busines.
                      And even if they did have their own business, were FORCED to hire Turks and it did not matter if they were unqualified (as in the case of my in-laws who have had an ongoing business in Turkey for many decades and had some absolute goons as employees). And don't even get me started on the "special taxes" my wifes grandfather paid during WWII.
                      General Antranik (1865-1927): “I am not a nationalist. I recognize only one nation, the nation of the oppressed.”

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X