"Azeri" barbarians are destroying what's left of the ancient Jugha cemetery

[Serdar]

Isn't it interesting that not a single one of our half dozen Turkish members here has raised their voice against the destruction of these ancient khachkars? They can't deny that it's happening since we have video taped footage of it, yet they don't condemn it; instead they make excuses for it. Is this not an act of barbarism? How is it different from the Taliban when they destroyed the Budha statues? They were barbarians, and the Azeris are barbarians; it's as simple as that.

I agree. Azeris aren't barbarians though, that makes them sound powerful. And we all know they're weak so they spend their time destroying khachkars since Artsakh annihilated their pathetic army just one decade ago!

[Kharpert]

This is also considering that Azerbaijan was using much more sophisticated Soviet military equipment, and they still lost.

[Serdar]

Kharpert, we know that, but they try to pass themselves off as the victims and the ones with no weaponry. Why won't they admit that they suck?

[TurQ]

It should be clear that I and some other Turks did condemn. My posts are preserved you can checkout those.

Isn't it interesting that not a single one of our half dozen Turkish members here has raised their voice against the destruction of these ancient khachkars? They can't deny that it's happening since we have video taped footage of it, yet they don't condemn it; instead they make excuses for it. Is this not an act of barbarism? How is it different from the Taliban when they destroyed the Budha statues? They were barbarians, and the Azeris are barbarians; it's as simple as that.

[phantom]

It should be clear that I and some other Turks did condemn. My posts are preserved you can checkout those.

Where is it clear TurQ? There are 100 posts in this thread and not one of them is a Turkish post condemning the barbaric and sick act of destroying works of art. On the contrary, there are Turkish posts congratulating and calling for further destruction.

[TurQ]

I am responsible only for my posts Phantom.

And let me reiterate one more time. Whatever the reasonis, the historic buidings are innocent, there can not be any justification of any sort as an excuse to demolish them.
HAving said that those Armenians who say TUrks and Azeris have no right to live in Caucusia(I.e on Armenian lands) like Hellektor have no right to agonize over Nahjivan demolitions, because they advocate the very same thing for Azeris, and as they rationalize the wiping of all Azeri existence and heritage from current day Armenian lands, they have no slight ethical right to condemn those demolitions.

Where is it clear TurQ? There are 100 posts in this thread and not one of them is a Turkish post condemning the barbaric and sick act of destroying works of art. On the contrary, there are Turkish posts congratulating and calling for further destruction.

[TurQ]

http://www.armeniangenocide.com/forum/showthread.php?p=8896#post8896

I found one of them...

Where is it clear TurQ? There are 100 posts in this thread and not one of them is a Turkish post condemning the barbaric and sick act of destroying works of art. On the contrary, there are Turkish posts congratulating and calling for further destruction.

[phantom]

http://www.armeniangenocide.com/foru...=8896#post8896
I found one of them...

That's what you call condemnation. You give with one hand and take back with two! Let me tell you something, Armenians would have been quite content living with Azeris, but not ruled by Azeris. Do you understand the distinction? It was not the Armenians who struck the first blow. It was the Azeris. Now, you can't attack a person and then complain that that person doesn't want to live with you. While the Baku and Sumgait massacres were going on and hundreds of Armenian civilians were getting killed, not a single Azeri hair was harmed in Armenia. Just remember that when you complain that Armenians want a homogeous state.

[TurQ]

Phantom
Did you see the post that I was refering to some articles on KArabag?
As an answer I refer them.

I dont need to give one hand or to get two. I replied that particular post to a racist Armenian (his nickname is Armenian).


KArabag problem is much more historical than the Azeri mis treatment. The mis treatment is not one sided. It is the control of land issue. KArabag Armenians(the leaders) themselves are among the major problems in Armenia. They influence politics immensely, killing even the prime minister.

About sinngle Azeri was not hurt in Armenia, I again refer to those articles in this post

http://www.armeniangenocide.com/forum/showthread.php?p=9305#post9305

That's what you call condemnation. You give with one hand and take back with two! Let me tell you something, Armenians would have been quite content living with Azeris, but not ruled by Azeris. Do you understand the distinction? It was not the Armenians who struck the first blow. It was the Azeris. Now, you can't attack a person and then complain that that person doesn't want to live with you. While the Baku and Sumgait massacres were going on and hundreds of Armenian civilians were getting killed, not a single Azeri hair was harmed in Armenia. Just remember that when you complain that Armenians want a homogeous state.

[1.5 million]

Yes TurQ - we see you. We hear your pathetic claims regarding times past and the present where you blame Armenians and justify (and deny) Turkish actions. You are neither honorable nor are you in the least an open minded empathetic person. You are a denier and desperate falsifier. You are an ugly nationalistic Turk - nothing more.