Re: Letter from Prof. Ataov to US Senator about Armenian-Turkish issue
Notice how this "professor" uses secondary sources (Bernard Lewis? You've got to be kidding). What about German, Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman commanders, who were all present on the ground, and who all wrote about what happened to the Armenians based on what they saw? What about American travellers in the region during the atrocities? All these sources paint the same picture, which is exactly why he has ommitted them.
A major part of his argument is that westerners are not looking at "both sides" of the issue. He comes from a country where the academia and public are forced to believe one side of the issue on pain of imprisonment or assassination. It is safe to assume that he supports this status quo of bullying intellectuals and thinkers, because instead of protesting this atmosphere of censorship, he chooses as his life's work to endorse these same state lines. One can literally sit here for days and dissect the falsehoods in this letter--- it simply isn't worth the time. This "professor" has not disproven any of the first-hand accounts of Americans, French, British, Arabs, Germans, Austro-Hungarians and Ottomans, all of which are independent sources and all of which agree 100% with Armenian sources. In short, this psuedo-intellectual still has all his work ahead of him
Notice how this "professor" uses secondary sources (Bernard Lewis? You've got to be kidding). What about German, Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman commanders, who were all present on the ground, and who all wrote about what happened to the Armenians based on what they saw? What about American travellers in the region during the atrocities? All these sources paint the same picture, which is exactly why he has ommitted them.
A major part of his argument is that westerners are not looking at "both sides" of the issue. He comes from a country where the academia and public are forced to believe one side of the issue on pain of imprisonment or assassination. It is safe to assume that he supports this status quo of bullying intellectuals and thinkers, because instead of protesting this atmosphere of censorship, he chooses as his life's work to endorse these same state lines. One can literally sit here for days and dissect the falsehoods in this letter--- it simply isn't worth the time. This "professor" has not disproven any of the first-hand accounts of Americans, French, British, Arabs, Germans, Austro-Hungarians and Ottomans, all of which are independent sources and all of which agree 100% with Armenian sources. In short, this psuedo-intellectual still has all his work ahead of him
Comment