Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Do you want revenge?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • same things, same men, same sh*ts =)) why you still continue it?

    Comment


    • Arnold, the person you choosed as governor, even claimed Armenian genocide. What does he know about it
      Does he even know where Turkey is on the map?
      Everyone is using you.
      May I ask a question, what do you think about Algerian genocide? France still deny their own genocide and their parliement approve Armenian genocide. Is it logical?
      Yes it was a massacre. It was very bad and shameful. But inisiting on the word genocide brings us nowhere. Because personally I don't want to be the scapegoat of Europeans' crimes.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by vatepiti
        I don't understand your collective pyscology. Why do you always compare with Jews? Is it something reputable or sympatetic to face with a genocide?
        If those two were real genocides how can you describe what Americans did to Indians since only some hundreds of Indians left at the whole continent?
        Specifically here - Dr Melson - a Jew and a Holocaust survivor BTW - wrote this book specifically comparing the Genocide and the Holocaust. The book reveals striking parallels in the development of the situations in each nation and of the relationships between the dominant majority ethnic-religious group to the victimized minority ethnic-religious group.

        In general the comparisons are made because most people in the world are not at all even aware of the Armenian Genocide. The Jewsih Holocaust is a point of reference that most everyone is familiar with. And the parallels between these two events are extensive and significant. I have posted on these in the past - perhaps you require that I do so again...

        Comment


        • Originally posted by vatepiti
          Arnold, the person you choosed as governor, even claimed Armenian genocide. What does he know about it
          Does he even know where Turkey is on the map?
          Everyone is using you.
          May I ask a question, what do you think about Algerian genocide? France still deny their own genocide and their parliement approve Armenian genocide. Is it logical?
          Yes it was a massacre. It was very bad and shameful. But inisiting on the word genocide brings us nowhere. Because personally I don't want to be the scapegoat of Europeans' crimes.
          The term genocide was developed by Ralph Lemkin in large part to specifically describe the Armenian Genocide as no words existed to describe such terrible crimes.

          I do not live in California. Obviously it was a political move - so what - he has a large Armenian constituency that cares about this issue - and it was the right thing to do. It is however unimportant. What is important - and what you should be concerned about is that your nations denies it - and it is the truth - it is what was done - it is what happened.

          Comment


          • Again the same shi*
            Ataturk never involved to such a crime. What 400.000 Armenians killed by Ataturk are you talking about. By saying this you proved that ou don't know the history and you are ignorant about history.
            Just parroting Dadrian doesn't make you an intellectual, sorry.

            Comment


            • May I quote and ask again:

              I don't understand your collective pyscology. Why do you always compare with Jews? Is it something reputable or sympatetic to face with a genocide?
              If those two were real genocides how can you describe what Americans did to Indians since only some hundreds of Indians left at the whole continent???

              Comment


              • Originally posted by vatepiti
                Again the same shi*
                Ataturk never involved to such a crime. What 400.000 Armenians killed by Ataturk are you talking about. By saying this you proved that ou don't know the history and you are ignorant about history.
                Just parroting Dadrian doesn't make you an intellectual, sorry.
                wrong. And I don't parrot Dadrian - I have done extensive reading and research on this issue - including Dadrian - of course - but my primary sources do not tend to be Dadrian and are varied non-the less.

                Again I think I have already posted describing Ataturks involvement during your (so-called) War of national Liberation. You should look into the memoirs of General Karim Karrabekir...among others...

                Comment


                • Originally posted by vatepiti
                  May I quote and ask again:

                  I don't understand your collective pyscology. Why do you always compare with Jews? Is it something reputable or sympatetic to face with a genocide?
                  If those two were real genocides how can you describe what Americans did to Indians since only some hundreds of Indians left at the whole continent???
                  I have answered this question. Likewise I adressed the issue of the Native American "Genocde" previoulsy. It can be considered a Genocide though its undertaking as a whole was not as specific or deliberate as the Turkish one against the Armenians. BTW - its in our history books...and there were and are considerably more then a few hundreds of Native Americans then adn now...I know I know...its in the Turkish history books - I understand....tsk tsk...

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by winoman
                    I have answered this question. Likewise I adressed the issue of the Native American "Genocde" previoulsy. It can be considered a Genocide though its undertaking as a whole was not as specific or deliberate as the Turkish one against the Armenians. BTW - its in our history books...and there were and are considerably more then a few hundreds of Native Americans then adn now...I know I know...its in the Turkish history books - I understand....tsk tsk...
                    Since your "Americans" found a new continent and killed %99 of all people former inhabitants of the continent. %99
                    And you still are trying to advocate your America.
                    Bravo
                    Did USA approved it as genocide????
                    Noooo....
                    Instead they showed natives as guilty with your Hollywood. And noted at history books like: yes we killed very few of them, but they were attacking to our immingrants, they were barbars, etc.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by vatepiti
                      Since your "Americans" found a new continent and killed %99 of all people former inhabitants of the continent. %99
                      And you still are trying to advocate your America.
                      Bravo
                      Did USA approved it as genocide????
                      Noooo....
                      Instead they showed natives as guilty with your Hollywood. And noted at history books like: yes we killed very few of them, but they were attacking to our immingrants, they were barbars, etc.
                      I think I have forgotten - did you say that you liked Chinese food? Or do you prefer Mexican?

                      BTW - you have not read the piece I posted concerning Lemkin and the origin of the term Genocide. It seems you wish to remain ignorant...no matter - I'm outa here for today...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X