If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Suddenly, when we Turks turn the spot-light of guilt and mistakes back on you, you resort to name calling?
Which one of my suggestions sounded racist to you? The reverse incriminations are trying to be applied to Turks, and you seem to applaud them.
LOSERS!!
[QUOTE=ace]
It is safe to say the Turkish people have NOT changed. If anything, they are SATISFIED with what happened to the Armenians.
/QUOTE]
The short answer is: No, *urks did not evolve enough to make another genocide an impossibility. It suffices to observe their behavior.
Of course, some revisionists of the Armenian Genocide who would distort facts in order to
1- Portray a more civilized image of *urks
2- Make all efforts to spread the lie of an - at least relatively - harmonious cohabitation with us - before the Genocide
would disagree and will probably react to my post.
Unfortunately, I don't have time for a more elaborate answer. Maybe in two weeks.
Our goal should be to "dismantle" - as much as possible - TEMPORARILY SO CALLED Turkey. In order to achieve our goal, we should aim at facilitating and favoring geo-political scenarios and conditions that would destabilize - as much as possible - TEMPORARILY SO CALLED i.e. politically, economically, sociologically etc.
It would be almost impossible to dismantle a stable country.
Note: I have chosen to auto censor the words "*urk," "*urkish" or *urkic" because it is commonly perceived as unpleasant and offending, evokes unpleasant emotions and imagery and is pregnant with immoral and evil connotations!
It is safe to say the Turkish people have NOT changed. If anything, they are SATISFIED with what happened to the Armenians.
/QUOTE]
The short answer is: No, *urks did not evolve enough to make another genocide an impossibility. It suffices to observe their behavior.
Of course, some revisionists of the Armenian Genocide who would distort facts in order to
1- Portray a more civilized image of *urks
2- Make all efforts to spread the lie of an - at least relatively - harmonious cohabitation with us - before the Genocide
would disagree and will probably react to my post.
Unfortunately, I don't have time for a more elaborate answer. Maybe in two weeks.
Our goal should be to "dismantle" - as much as possible - TEMPORARILY SO CALLED Turkey. In order to achieve our goal, we should aim at facilitating and favoring geo-political scenarios and conditions that would destabilize - as much as possible - TEMPORARILY SO CALLED i.e. politically, economically, sociologically etc.
It would be almost impossible to dismantle a stable country.
Note: I have chosen to auto censor the words "*urk," "*urkish" or *urkic" because it is commonly perceived as unpleasant and offending, evokes unpleasant emotions and imagery and is pregnant with immoral and evil connotations!
i love that kind of Armenians... i know nothing can justify what we did but as you can see it justifies what we are doing right now... keep up the good work.... and remember what happened last time we were destabilized... god i would like to see that happen... meet me at border line and dont try to read my messages because i will write them down on a hand grenade...
i love that kind of Armenians... i know nothing can justify what we did but as you can see it justifies what we are doing right now... keep up the good work.... and remember what happened last time we were destabilized... god i would like to see that happen... meet me at border line and dont try to read my messages because i will write them down on a hand grenade...
The jurk gets mad, seems enraged!
You can take a *urk out of the steppe, but you can't take the steppe out of a *urk.
*urks have only two choices:
1- In order to survive, they deny their own culture and mindset and become completely assimilated to Europe; in other words they cease to exist as *urks
2- They keep their medieval and Central Asian thief of the steppes mindset and eventually get destroyed
It seems to me that in both cases, *urks may have no future existence as *urks; their filthy culture and mindset are such that they are perceived as a parasite or a rat is perceived. But rats are intelligent and can survive, *urks are not.
Their are many ways to destabilize a country and hedge oneself from its consequences. The "last time" we did not mean to destabilize; now, we should.
Note: I have chosen to auto censor the words "*urk," "*urkish" or *urkic" because it is commonly perceived as unpleasant and offending, evokes unpleasant emotions and imagery and is pregnant with immoral and evil connotations!
Comment