Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

International Genocide Recognition

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • RUDO
    replied
    Originally posted by 1.5 million
    Rudo - at this point in your education concerning these issue I think it might be advisable to do more reading and absorbing of information rather then commenting/thinking aloud on the forum. I would suggest that unless you have a specific question or think that something you might be posting here be of specific value that you refrain from posting just to raise your post count and such. I offer you this advice in all seriousness and with no malice.
    I only want to learn something about AG here my friend.Isn't it the aim of this forum?I am learning a lot of things in Turkey but only from turkish side but here ı can learn information from armenian side.I am young you are right but I am here because I want to improve myself in these topics.ok?

    Leave a comment:


  • 1.5 million
    replied
    Rudo - at this point in your education concerning these issue I think it might be advisable to do more reading and absorbing of information rather then commenting/thinking aloud on the forum. I would suggest that unless you have a specific question or think that something you might be posting here be of specific value that you refrain from posting just to raise your post count and such. I offer you this advice in all seriousness and with no malice.

    Leave a comment:


  • RUDO
    replied
    But of course there are other ways.

    Leave a comment:


  • RUDO
    replied
    I don' understand.If all world recognise AG what will happen?I think even if it happens Turkey won't recognise AG .

    Leave a comment:


  • Hovik
    replied
    Lombardia Italian Region Adopted Armenian Genocide Resolution

    Pan Armenian

    Lombardia Italian Region Adopted Armenian Genocide Resolution

    28.01.2006 18:46 GMT+04:00

    /PanARMENIAN.Net/ January 24 the Parliament of Lombardia region, Italy
    passed a resolution, according to which the Genocide of a million and a half
    Armenians, which is considered the first ever genocide, should also be
    mentioned on the Genocide Commemoration Day. Earlier Lombardia recognized
    the Armenian Genocide in Ottoman Turkey in 1915, reported the Yerkir
    newspaper.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hovik
    replied
    'Infuriated bystander' Robert Fisk weighs in

    Daily Yomiuri, Japan
    Jan 15 2006


    'Infuriated bystander' Robert Fisk weighs in
    By James Hardy / Daily Yomiuri Staff Writer


    The Great War for Civilisation:
    The Conquest of the Middle East
    By Robert Fisk
    Knopf, 1,107 pp, 40 dollars


    "Terrorism, terrorism, terrorism. It has become a full stop, a
    punctuation mark, a phrase, a speech, a sermon, a be-all and end-all
    of everything that we must hate in order to ignore injustice and
    occupation and murder on a mass scale."

    Pulling no punches, The Great War for Civilisation is a 1,000-page
    tome that showcases Robert Fisk's brand of reportage with a
    conscience.

    A foreign correspondent, first for the The Times of London and then
    The Independent, who has received more awards than any other
    journalist, Fisk has 30 years of material to draw on and an archive
    of clippings and pieces that would put the news sections of most
    major newspapers to shame.

    Unsurprisingly, the book opens with Fisk's three interviews with
    Osama bin Laden--interviews that clearly explain the background to
    bin Laden's war against the West.

    Close up, bin Laden comes across as a more complex figure than the
    Bush administration would like to admit, while Fisk identifies a
    character trait that suggests the defeat of Al-Qaida is far from
    assured. "He was alarming because he was possessed of that quality
    which leads men to war: total self-conviction. In the years to come,
    I would see others manifest this dangerous characteristic--[U.S.]
    President George W. Bush and [British Prime Minister] Tony Blair come
    to mind--but never the fatal self-resolve of Osama bin Laden."

    Moving on to Fisk's own experiences of the Soviet invasion of
    Afghanistan, the story becomes more cloak-and-dagger, as our intrepid
    reporter takes on the local security apparatus and gets the scoop.
    Throughout this Cold War drama, Fisk provides historical context,
    whether it is the British Empire's 19th-century defeat in Afghanistan
    or its early 20th-century failure in Iraq, to the latest failed
    imperial adventures being played out before his eyes.

    The main point of the book--that the West's imperial failures will
    forever repeat themselves at the expense of the populations of the
    countries they are trying to control--will resonate with a younger
    audience who have no truck with realpolitik or regime change that is
    brought about to keep the price of gasoline below 2 dollars a gallon.


    Fisk notes from the start that the role of journalism is not--as he
    has sometimes thought--to "write the first pages of history." It is
    more important than that. "Our job," he quotes Israeli journalist
    Amira Hass as saying, "is to monitor the centres of power."

    Some of these "centres of power" are dotted around the Middle East,
    whether they be Algiers, Damascus, Baghdad or Tehran. But inevitably,
    it is the "centres of power" that are not in the region--but which
    Fisk contends have decided its fate since the post-World War I
    treaties--that come in for the most withering criticism.

    Washington's unquestioning support for Israel in defiance of U.N.
    resolutions and, Fisk argues, common humanity, comes in for
    particularly savage treatment, most notably in a chapter on the use
    of a U.S. Marine Corps Hellfire antiarmor missile, which had been
    handed over to the Israelis, in the destruction of a Palestinian
    ambulance, killing four women and two children who were traveling in
    it.

    Fisk has been pilloried in some reviews for being too shrill in his
    criticism of Western policy in the Middle East--his status as a
    self-described "ever more infuriated bystander" leaves some
    commentators turned off by what they see as self-righteousness. What
    he has over his detractors, and why this reviewer thinks he is being
    unfairly criticized, is firsthand experience of the results of the
    policies he condemns.

    Indeed, the strongest parts of this book are the straightforward
    reportage, whether it is from the front line of the Iran-Iraq War,
    the occupied Palestinian territories or the civil war in Algeria.

    There are many sections that are worth the cover price many times
    over. Fisk devotes a particularly harrowing chapter to the 1915-20
    Armenian Holocaust, in which 1.5 million Armenians were
    systematically slaughtered by the Turkish government--an event it
    continues to deny, even to the point of jailing those who dare to say
    otherwise.

    He does a similar job with an investigation into the effects of
    depleted uranium on children in southern Iraq--a massive increase in
    leukemia cases that doctors believe to be caused by shrapnel from
    U.S. and British shells. Both chapters leave readers wanting to know
    more, which is surely the point of good journalism.

    But the weaker sections of The Great War for Civilisation make an
    already long book unwieldy. Threading his father's minor role in
    World War I into the history of the Middle East is an unconvincing
    and unnecessary narrative device that does little to enlighten and
    much to irritate, while the latter chapters of the book substitute
    reporting for conjecture and finger wagging.

    While asides at the incompetence of subeditors and the uselessness of
    editors in general appear more than once, The Great War for
    Civilisation could have done with an aggressive edit, partly to cut
    it to a more manageable size, partly to cut out the portentousness
    that sometimes afflicts the prose, and partly to cut out Fisk's
    grandstanding, which mars the last chapters and weakens an otherwise
    fine addition to the West's understanding of its role in the
    continuing destruction and upheaval in the Middle East.

    (Jan. 15, 2006)

    Leave a comment:


  • Hovik
    replied
    History Lessons?

    TPMCafe, NY
    Jan 14 2006

    History Lessons?

    By Kate Cambor
    From: Culture Table

    Poor Jacques Chirac!

    While George Bush and Angela Merkel have been laying the groundwork
    for stronger future ties between Washington and Berlin, presenting a
    united front in opposition to Iran's nuclear program after their
    first meeting on Friday since Merkel became chancellor, poor Jacques
    Chirac has been stuck struggling with the past.


    Jan 14, 2006 -- 04:30:58 PM EST

    A historical debate has been brewing in France, one that actually
    began last February, when a law was passed that included this
    passage: "School programs are to recognize in particular the positive
    role of the French presence overseas, especially in North Africa, and
    give an eminent place to the history and sacrifices of fighters for
    the French army raised in these territories." The clause was
    inserted to please veterans and former colonists and, unsurprisingly,
    ended up displeasing just about everyone else, including the
    president of Algeria, Abdelaziz Bouteflika, and a host of educational
    and civic organizations. Eventually, even French prime minister,
    Dominique de Villepin, came out against it, telling France Inter
    radio: "It is not up to parliament to write history. There is no
    official history in France." Opponents of the law have petitioned
    for it to be repealed on the grounds that it "imposes an official lie
    about the crimes, the massacres that sometimes went as far as
    genocide, the slavery, the racism that has been inherited from this
    past."
    In the light of the recent urban and ethnic violence in Paris and
    other major cities ignited by the deaths two teenage boys, concern
    about the legacies of colonialism are no longer academic. And at a
    press conference last week, French president Jacques Chirac, sounding
    his most avuncular and expansive, announced that the law would be
    revisited and that the clause in question needed to be "rewritten."

    End of story? Hardly. Because there's been a lot of talk about
    rewriting history in la belle France recently. In December, Claude
    Ribbe, a respected black academic, published a new book about
    Napoleon, just in time for the 200th anniversary of the epic battle
    of Austerlitz. You only need to glance at the cover--the accusing
    title "Napoleon's Crime" is set against a photo of Hitler visiting
    Napoleon's tomb in 1940--to know this isn't going to be another
    celebration of Napoleon's military genius. In the book, Ribbe charges
    Napoleon with setting off a bloodbath in the Caribbean when he
    revived slavery in the French Empire in 1802 and furthering certain
    racist and pseudo-scientific theories that would later be taken up by
    the Nazis. He also protests against the "historical revisionism"
    that has allowed this darker side of Napoleon to remain largely
    overlooked. Perhaps unsurprisingly, French celebration of the
    anniversary of Austerlitz was decidedly muted, with politicians
    suddenly scrambling to distance themselves from the formerly great
    general now plagued with a nasty case of bad PR.

    The tricky thing in France is that certain versions of history have
    become the law of the land--literally. One French historian, Olivier
    Pétré-Grenouilleau, recently found this out when, during an
    interview, he made statements implying that the slave trade was not a
    crime against humanity. (He actually said it did not constitute
    genocide). An organization of intellectuals from overseas regions
    (Guyana, the Caribbean, Réunion, etc) has accused him of breaking a
    2001 law recognizing slavery as a crime against humanity; and, if
    found guilty, he could lose his academic appointment.

    There are currently four such laws of memorialization--the 2001 law
    about slavery, a 1990 law punishing the denial of the Holocaust, a
    2001 law recognizing the Armenian genocide
    , and the February 2005 law
    affirming the "positive role" of colonialism--and some of the
    best-known historians have recently demanded that any such laws
    "restraining a historian's freedom, telling him on pain of punishment
    what he should ... find" should be struck down.

    At first glance all this may seem like mere Gallic posturing over
    long-dead issues. But from Bush's 2003 denunciation of critics of the
    war in Iraq as "historical revisionists" to new challenges to
    Darwinism and science, haven't we been weathering similar storms on
    this side of the pond? Of course, revisionism doesn't have to be a
    bad thing, as Princeton University professor and former American
    Historical Association President James McPherson eloquently explained
    in this essay responding to Bush's accusations. I only hope
    historians in the future, looking back on these times, will be able
    to tell the good revisionists from the bad. In the meantime, with his
    nation seemingly in a rut and the right-wing eternal candidate
    Jean-Marie Le Pen hoping to translate up post-riots frustrations into
    votes for his presidential candidacy, Jacques Chirac will certainly
    have his hands full in 2006.


    http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2006/1/14/163058/427

    Leave a comment:


  • Hovik
    replied
    Armenia And Germany: 90 Years After Genocide Conference Held In Germany

    ARMENIA AND GERMANY: 90 YEARS AFTER GENOCIDE CONFERENCE HELD IN GERMANY

    Pan Armenian
    11.01.2006 21:32 GMT+04:00

    /PanARMENIAN.Net/ A scientific conference titled Armenia and Germany:
    90 Years after Genocide was held in Wittenberg German city at the
    turn of 2005.

    The event started with a funeral prayer in an Armenian church in
    Germany.

    Martin Luter University professor, director of the Mesrop Center for
    Armenian Studies Hermann Goltz made an opening speech. Stages of
    creation and development of resolutions on the Armenian Genocide,
    introduced before the Bundestag April 21 and June 16, as well as
    expected developments were discussed during the conference. Bundestag
    Deputy representing the Christian-Democratic and Social Democratic
    Parties Christoph Bergner, Green party Deputy Marialuis Bek, Second
    Secretary of the Armenian Embassy in Germany Victor Biagov and others
    delivered speeches. Hermann Goltz made a report on activities of
    Johannes Lepsius favorable for Armenians. Hermann Goltz simultaneously
    acquainted those present with documented details of the Armenian
    Genocide.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hovik
    replied
    2005 Was Important For International Recognition Of Armenian Genocide

    2005 WAS IMPORTANT FOR INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

    Pan Armenian
    10.01.2006 22:13 GMT+04:00

    /PanARMENIAN.Net/ In 2005 Lithuania, Holland, Venezuela and Poland
    joined the countries, which recognized the Armenian Genocide, Armenian
    FM Vartan Oskanian stated at today's news conference on the results
    of the MFA activities in 2005. In his words, Russian State Duma again
    reaffirmed the resolution on recognition of the Armenian Genocide
    adopted earlier.

    Argentinean Senate passed two statements denouncing the Armenian
    Genocide, German Bundestag adopted a special resolution on the events
    in 1915 and Germany's involvement in these. US State of Kansas also
    passed a respective decision. According to the Armenian FM, the problem
    of the Armenian Genocide being withdrawn from the topics "banned"
    in Turkey was a direct consequence of the process of international
    recognition of the Armenian Genocide in 2005. Turkish PM Recep Tayyip
    Erdogan proposed forming a commission of historians at a Turkish
    Parliament session past year, while a conference scientists recognizing
    the Armenian Genocide was organized at Bilgi University in Turkey.

    In V. Oskanian's words, the need to properly acknowledge the Armenian
    Genocide is becoming more specified in the course of Turkey's accession
    to the EU as a demand "to put up with own history." The provision
    was mentioned in the European Parliament Report on Turkey's Progress
    dated 28 September 2005. The Armenian FM remarked the 90th anniversary
    of the Armenian Genocide was marked at the international level in
    2005. V. Oskanian highlighted the scientific conference Ultimate
    Crime, Ultimate Challenge: Human Rights and Genocide in Yerevan in
    April. Scholars, experts and political scientists from 20 countries,
    including Turkey, took part in it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hovik
    replied
    France Considers Opportunity To Review Law On Armenian Genocide

    FRANCE CONSIDERS OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW LAW ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

    Pan Armenian
    09.01.2006 19:41 GMT+04:00

    /PanARMENIAN.Net/ Debate has started in France over a number of laws
    touching the history, including those censuring crimes against humanity
    and making denial of historical facts a penal action. As reported by
    CNN-Turk TV Channel, there is an opportunity to pass new legal acts
    that will in fact deny the laws adopted earlier that censured the
    Armenian Genocide in Ottoman Turkey early past century and Jewish
    Holocaust in World War II.

    Specifically, according to French Parliamentary Speaker Jean-Louis
    Debre, a special commission is formed to eliminate the connection
    between legal acts and historical events. Earlier a group of 19
    historian scholars proposed withdrawing the article condemning the
    Armenian Genocide in Turkey from legislation. They consider that
    "articles of the law in question limit scientific discussion."

    French President Jacques Chirac has also presented his viewpoint on
    the occasion. In his words, France has to transform its legislation
    to promote creation of a positive image of the colonial past of the
    country in the text-books." It should be noted that in 2001 the French
    Parliament adopted a law qualifying the events in Turkey in 1915 as
    a Genocide of Armenians. The French Parliament also passed another
    law, which qualified the transatlantic slave-trade as a crime against
    humanity, reported IA Regnum.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X