Impact of Diyarbakir felt in Ankara
Impact of Diyarbakir felt in Ankara
Mete Belovacikli
[email protected]30 March 2006
This week's incidents in Diyarbakir have led to a gradual rise in tension in that city and in Ankara as well. Tension is rising due to the fact security forces have been unable to take control of the situation.
As local police were incapable of dealing with the incidents on Tuesday, special teams were dispatched to the city. Armored vehicles were also brought into the city from neighboring cities yesterday morning.
I mentioned in my column yesterday how readers had commented about these incidents on Turkish newspaper websites. There were two basic approaches in those reactions.
The first group of readers believe that "Kurds should leave the country," while the second group says that the demonstrations should be ended through all means necessary, including violence.
These two approaches include reactions that are very strong. The average person may think like that, but what does Ankara think?
The officials that I asked this to are at a much sharper point. It seems as if a commonsense approach within the scope of classic state administration has given way to stronger rhetoric.
Let me give you a couple of examples...
There are those who believe that the Diyarbakir incidents were triggered in an attempt to prevent a spring operation against the terrorist Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), which is set to start soon. They underline that the coming period will be one in which strong measures will be taken against the PKK and believe that the terrorist group will thus shift towards mass actions in major cities.
However, the same sources don't fail to repeat that very strong measures will be taken despite the efforts of the terrorist organization and its supporters.
Another example is as follows:
A rumor in Ankara circles says that a law on "population exchange" may be proposed. You may wonder how such a law could come about. Let me explain ...
The decision-makers in Ankara believe that the public tends to go to extremes about the Kurdish problem. They've decided that the Kurdish problem cannot be solved through being able to separate out terrorists from ordinary people.
The same decision-makers reluctantly say that the public has started to express ideas such as that the Kurdish problem can be solved through either total or partial division of the region from Turkey or through ethnic cleansing.
Worried that these beliefs may quickly bring Turkey to the brink of an internal conflict, the decision-makers cite those who claim that the problem can be solved through a population exchange law. Those who support this opinion say, "Let's draw up the borders, those Kurds living in the west should go east."
The decision-makers of course don't share this opinion but they are disturbed by the fact that such opinions are becoming more influential and now they feel a greater urge to solve the problem. They consider the solution to be taking stricter measures in order to reassure the public.
As I said earlier, this seems the reason for Ankara adopting stronger rhetoric. This is the ripple effect of the Diyarbakir incidents on Ankara...
Impact of Diyarbakir felt in Ankara
Mete Belovacikli
[email protected]30 March 2006
This week's incidents in Diyarbakir have led to a gradual rise in tension in that city and in Ankara as well. Tension is rising due to the fact security forces have been unable to take control of the situation.
As local police were incapable of dealing with the incidents on Tuesday, special teams were dispatched to the city. Armored vehicles were also brought into the city from neighboring cities yesterday morning.
I mentioned in my column yesterday how readers had commented about these incidents on Turkish newspaper websites. There were two basic approaches in those reactions.
The first group of readers believe that "Kurds should leave the country," while the second group says that the demonstrations should be ended through all means necessary, including violence.
These two approaches include reactions that are very strong. The average person may think like that, but what does Ankara think?
The officials that I asked this to are at a much sharper point. It seems as if a commonsense approach within the scope of classic state administration has given way to stronger rhetoric.
Let me give you a couple of examples...
There are those who believe that the Diyarbakir incidents were triggered in an attempt to prevent a spring operation against the terrorist Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), which is set to start soon. They underline that the coming period will be one in which strong measures will be taken against the PKK and believe that the terrorist group will thus shift towards mass actions in major cities.
However, the same sources don't fail to repeat that very strong measures will be taken despite the efforts of the terrorist organization and its supporters.
Another example is as follows:
A rumor in Ankara circles says that a law on "population exchange" may be proposed. You may wonder how such a law could come about. Let me explain ...
The decision-makers in Ankara believe that the public tends to go to extremes about the Kurdish problem. They've decided that the Kurdish problem cannot be solved through being able to separate out terrorists from ordinary people.
The same decision-makers reluctantly say that the public has started to express ideas such as that the Kurdish problem can be solved through either total or partial division of the region from Turkey or through ethnic cleansing.
Worried that these beliefs may quickly bring Turkey to the brink of an internal conflict, the decision-makers cite those who claim that the problem can be solved through a population exchange law. Those who support this opinion say, "Let's draw up the borders, those Kurds living in the west should go east."
The decision-makers of course don't share this opinion but they are disturbed by the fact that such opinions are becoming more influential and now they feel a greater urge to solve the problem. They consider the solution to be taking stricter measures in order to reassure the public.
As I said earlier, this seems the reason for Ankara adopting stronger rhetoric. This is the ripple effect of the Diyarbakir incidents on Ankara...
Comment