Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armenian
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    U.S. Says Israeli Exercise Seemed Directed at Iran



    srael carried out a major military exercise earlier this month that American officials say appeared to be a rehearsal for a potential bombing attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Several American officials said the Israeli exercise appeared to be an effort to develop the military’s capacity to carry out long-range strikes and to demonstrate the seriousness with which Israel views Iran’s nuclear program. More than 100 Israeli F-16 and F-15 fighters participated in the maneuvers, which were carried out over the eastern Mediterranean and over Greece during the first week of June, American officials said. The exercise also included Israeli helicopters that could be used to rescue downed pilots. The helicopters and refueling tankers flew more than 900 miles, which is about the same distance between Israel and Iran’s uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, American officials said.

    Israeli officials declined to discuss the details of the exercise. A spokesman for the Israeli military would say only that the country’s air force “regularly trains for various missions in order to confront and meet the challenges posed by the threats facing Israel.” But the scope of the Israeli exercise virtually guaranteed that it would be noticed by American and other foreign intelligence agencies. A senior Pentagon official who has been briefed on the exercise, and who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the political delicacy of the matter, said the exercise appeared to serve multiple purposes. One Israeli goal, the Pentagon official said, was to practice flight tactics, aerial refueling and all other details of a possible strike against Iran’s nuclear installations and its long-range conventional missiles.

    A second, the official said, was to send a clear message to the United States and other countries that Israel was prepared to act militarily if diplomatic efforts to stop Iran from producing bomb-grade uranium continued to falter. “They wanted us to know, they wanted the Europeans to know, and they wanted the Iranians to know,” the Pentagon official said. “There’s a lot of signaling going on at different levels.” Several American officials said they did not believe that the Israeli government had concluded that it must attack Iran and did not think that such a strike was imminent. Shaul Mofaz, a former Israeli defense minister who is now a deputy prime minister, warned in a recent interview with the Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharonot that Israel might have no choice but to attack. “If Iran continues with its program for developing nuclear weapons, we will attack,” Mr. Mofaz said in the interview published on June 6, the day after the unpublicized exercise ended. “Attacking Iran, in order to stop its nuclear plans, will be unavoidable.”

    But Mr. Mofaz was criticized by other Israeli politicians as seeking to enhance his own standing as questions mount about whether the embattled Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, can hang on to power. Israeli officials have told their American counterparts that Mr. Mofaz’s statement does not represent official policy. But American officials were also told that Israel had prepared plans for striking nuclear targets in Iran and could carry them out if needed. Iran has shown signs that it is taking the Israeli warnings seriously, by beefing up its air defenses in recent weeks, including increasing air patrols. In one instance, Iran scrambled F-4 jets to double-check an Iraqi civilian flight from Baghdad to Tehran. “They are clearly nervous about this and have their air defense on guard,” a Bush administration official said of the Iranians.

    Any Israeli attack against Iran’s nuclear facilities would confront a number of challenges. Many American experts say they believe that such an attack could delay but not eliminate Iran’s nuclear program. Much of the program’s infrastructure is buried under earth and concrete and installed in long tunnels or hallways, making precise targeting difficult. There is also concern that not all of the facilities have been detected. To inflict maximum damage, multiple attacks might be necessary, which many analysts say is beyond Israel’s ability at this time. But waiting also entails risks for the Israelis. Israeli officials have repeatedly expressed fears that Iran will soon master the technology it needs to produce substantial quantities of highly enriched uranium for nuclear weapons.

    Iran is also taking steps to better defend its nuclear facilities. Two sets of advance Russian-made radar systems were recently delivered to Iran. The radar will enhance Iran’s ability to detect planes flying at low altitude. Mike McConnell, the director of national intelligence, said in February that Iran was close to acquiring Russian-produced SA-20 surface-to-air missiles. American military officials said that the deployment of such systems would hamper Israel’s attack planning, putting pressure on Israel to act before the missiles are fielded. For both the United States and Israel, Iran’s nuclear program has been a persistent worry. A National Intelligence Estimate that was issued in December by American intelligence agencies asserted that Iran had suspended work on weapons design in late 2003. The report stated that it was unclear if that work had resumed. It also noted that Iran’s work on uranium enrichment and on missiles, two steps that Iran would need to take to field a nuclear weapon, had continued.

    In late May, the International Atomic Energy Agency reported that Iran’s suspected work on nuclear matters was a “matter of serious concern” and that the Iranians owed the agency “substantial explanations.” Over the past three decades, Israel has carried out two unilateral attacks against suspected nuclear sites in the Middle East. In 1981, Israeli jets conducted a raid against Iraq’s nuclear plant at Osirak after concluding that it was part of Saddam Hussein’s program to develop nuclear weapons. In September, Israeli aircraft bombed a structure in Syria that American officials said housed a nuclear reactor built with the aid of North Korea. The United States protested the Israeli strike against Iraq in 1981, but its comments in recent months have amounted to an implicit endorsement of the Israeli strike in Syria.

    Pentagon officials said that Israel’s air forces usually conducted a major early summer training exercise, often flying over the Mediterranean or training ranges in Turkey where they practice bombing runs and aerial refueling. But the exercise this month involved a larger number of aircraft than had been previously observed, and included a lengthy combat rescue mission. Much of the planning appears to reflect a commitment by Israel’s military leaders to ensure that its armed forces are adequately equipped and trained, an imperative driven home by the difficulties the Israeli military encountered in its Lebanon operation against Hezbollah. “They rehearse it, rehearse it and rehearse it, so if they actually have to do it, they’re ready,” the Pentagon official said. “They’re not taking any options off the table.”

    Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/20/wa...20iran.html?hp

    Leave a comment:


  • Armenian
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    600 Iranian companies active in Armenia


    Iran’s ambassador to Yerevan announced on Wednesday that 600 Iranian firms have been registered in Armenia so far, IRNA reported on Wednesday. In a meeting with a visiting delegation of merchants and marketing managers from central Yazd led by the province’s Chamber of Commerce, Industries and Mines, Ali Saqqaeian stated, “The major policy of the country is based on expanding the export of non-oil products and that is why representatives of the Islamic Republic abroad make efforts to promote non-oil exports.” He said that 50-60 Iranian trucks bring consignments to Armenia annually. Saqqaeian criticized the traditional viewpoint regarding export and explained that competition, quality, and marketing were the three pillars of export today. Chairing the delegation, the head of Yazd’s Chamber of Commerce, Industries and Mines Aslanzadeh announced that Yazd province has exported $236 million worth of products to 30 countries and ranked 11 in the country in the past (Iranian calendar)year (ended March 19,2008).

    Source: http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=171128

    Leave a comment:


  • Armenian
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    Originally posted by Eric View Post
    What do you think Armenian is Israel capable of conducting an air strike on the Iranian Nuclear facilities alone, without the help of US troops or Airfields based in Iraq? Could you please tell me where the nuclear sites are located approximately and what kind of arsenal would be used in case of an air strike. Would Iranian air defenses be capable of tracking and/or shooting them down. I know you have some military knowledge, and I would really love to know what you think.
    Good question. But a difficult/complex question. I may have attempted to answer a similar question in this thread already. I am not sure. Nevertheless, Israel can not do it alone, they will need support from the US and regional Arab states such as Saudi Arabia and Jordan. Mind you that this support does not necessarily have to be public, it could be clandestine/covert. I believe that Israel will get support from the US, Jordan and Saudi Arabia if and when they decide they will strike Iran.

    Naturally, the IAF will use their upgraded F-15s and F-16s. For target acquisition they will rely on CIA and Mossad human intelligence as well as satellite/aircraft reconnaissance information. They will need an air corridor secured over Jordan and Iraq. They will most probably also need the US for aerial refueling if need be. The weapon of choice will be selected from a large array of laser guided bombs and/or missiles. The fundamental tactical problem would be range/fuel considerations and being detected on route, perhaps by Russian intelligence.

    Even if the IAF solved the range/fuel problem and reached its target/s undetected there would still be a problem with knocking out all the nuclear sites. This is a serious problem. Based on what I have been reading and hearing, Iran has been spreading its nuclear facilities across the nation in many underground and undisclosed locations. At best, the IAF may be able to knock out a few of these sites, perhaps the most important ones or the biggest ones. However, knocking out the entire nuclear network may prove to be virtually impossible, unless of course they have a high level spy/agent working within Iran's nuclear program. With only a few sites hit, Iran will be able to recover relatively quickly.

    Regarding anti-aircraft capabilities: Pardon the pun, but it's still up in the air. The Russian anti-aircraft systems said to be protecting some of the more sensitive sites in Iran are said to be some of the finest in the world. However, they have not been tested in combat. What's more, we don't know what countermeasures the IAF and the USAF are devising. They may have figured out a way to crack the anti-aircraft defense system. Maybe not. We know, however, that they performed a successful trial mission late last year, essentially a live fire exercise using new radar jammers, where they stuck some mysterious site deep inside the Syrian desert.

    Nonetheless, with or without a capable anti-aircraft defense in Iran the IAF will have a very difficult tactical task on its hands. Their mission won't succeed because the IAF will not be able to stop Iran nuclear drive. Thus, the strike may be a strategic failure. Moreover, what we are not taking into serious consideration the other strategic aspect of such a strike, the factor of the aftermath. That is where the real problem for Israel, US and the rest lies. They may succeed in hitting and destroying some sites in Iran but what kind of a response will Tehran take is the big question.

    Tehran can potentially wreak havoc in the region if is chooses to -

    It can shut down the Strait of Hormuz to oil tanker traffic, ruining Europe's economy within a couple of days.

    It can instigate a major uprising against American troops in Iraq using its strong assets in the majority Shiite population there.

    It can hit US and coalition navy ships in the Persian Gulf using various Russian and Chinese made anti-ship missiles.

    It can hit various tactical and strategic targets throughout the region by its medium and long range ballistic missiles.

    As you can see, it can get very ugly.

    In any case, the tactical and strategic advantages lie with Tehran at this point. A strike won't stop their nuclear program and such a strike may cause very nasty repercussions. This is serious. In my opinion, nothing this serious has been faced by the US military since the Second World War. Perhaps that is why the US military as well as Israel are dragging their feet.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eric
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    Originally posted by Armenian View Post
    Israel to attack Iran unless enrichment stops-minister



    An Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites looks "unavoidable" given the apparent failure of sanctions to deny Tehran technology with bomb-making potential, one of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's deputies said on Friday. "If Iran continues with its programme for developing nuclear weapons, we will attack it. The sanctions are ineffective," Transport Minister Shaul Mofaz told the mass-circulation Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper. "Attacking Iran, in order to stop its nuclear plans, will be unavoidable," said the former army chief who has also been defence minister. It was the most explicit threat yet against Iran from a member of Olmert's government, which, like the Bush administration, has preferred to hint at force as a last resort should U.N. Security Council sanctions be deemed a dead end. Iran has defied Western pressure to abandon its uranium enrichment projects, which it says are for peaceful electricity generation rather than bomb-building. The leadership in Tehran has also threatened to retaliate against Israel -- believed to have the Middle East's only atomic arsenal -- and U.S. targets in the Gulf for any attack on Iran.

    Mofaz also said in the interview that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has called for Israel to be wiped off the map, "would disappear before Israel does." A spokesman for Prime Minister Ehud Olmert did not address Mofaz's comments directly but said that "all options must remain on the table" and said more could be done to put financial pressure on Tehran. "Israel believes strongly that while the U.N. sanctions are positive, much more needs to be done to pressure the regime in Tehran to cease its aggressive nuclear programme," spokesman Mark Regev said. "We believe the international community should be considering further tangible steps such as embargoing refined petroleum headed for Iran, sanctions against Iraninan buisnessmen travelling abroad, tightening the pressure on Iranian financial institutions and other such steps," he added. Mofaz's remarks came as he and several other senior members of Olmert's Kadima Party prepare for a possible run for top office should a corruption scandal force the Israeli prime minister to step down.

    Iranian-born Mofaz has been a main party rival of the Israeli prime minister, particularly following the 2006 elections when Olmert was forced to hand the defence portfolio to Labour, his main coalition partner, at Mofaz's expense. Mofaz, who is also designated as a deputy prime minister, has remained privy to Israel's defence planning. He is a member of Olmert's security cabinet and leads regular strategic coordination talks with the U.S. State Department. Israeli planes destroyed Iraq's nuclear reactor in 1981. A similar Israeli sortie over Syria last September razed what the U.S. administration said was a nascent nuclear reactor built with North Korean help. Syria denied having any such facility. Independent analysts have questioned, however, whether Israel's armed forces can take on Iran alone, as its nuclear sites are numerous, distant and well-fortified. (Additional reporting by Ori Lewis; Editing by Dominic Evans)

    Source: http://wiredispatch.com/news/?id=200782

    U.S. Commander: Iran War Would Be 'Disastrous'


    U.S. Navy's Persian Gulf Commander Says War With Iran Would Cause 'Aftershocks' in the Region

    The top U.S. Navy official in the Persian Gulf warned in an interview with ABC News that war with Iran would be "pretty disastrous," with "echoes and aftershocks" reverberating throughout the region. "Nobody I've spoken to suggests that going to war with Iran is a good thing," Vice Adm. Kevin Cosgriff told ABC News. "The preferred path by far is the diplomatic path, keep working with the international community to bring the right sort of pressure to bear on the Islamic Republic of Iran." For years, there has been a swirl of speculation about the prospects of war, as the United States has accused Iran of arming militias in Iraq, trying to develop nuclear weapons and supporting terrorism. President Bush and other top U.S. officials have repeatedly stressed diplomacy when it comes to Iran, but say "all options are on the table," including the military option.

    If it did come to waging war with Iran, Adm. Cosgriff's forces would likely play a central role. As the head of the Fifth Fleet, he is the commander of U.S. naval forces in the Persian Gulf. "As I look at the landscape, we should just sort of keep the pressure on, the big pressure, diplomatic, economic," he said. "Part of that [pressure] is for military forces, in this case the United States Fifth Fleet, to say we intend to be able to conduct operations in that part of the world in support of our friends and U.S. interests without being harassed or threatened by you, because we are not threatening you," Cosgriff said. "We have been there for decades; we are going to be there for decades." Cosgriff believes "we have years" to deal with Iran's nuclear program because "It's going to take them a while to do all it will take to finish all the work that needs to go into developing a weapon," but he fears that a miscalculation or misunderstanding could lead to military conflict with the United States.

    One worrying development being carefully watched by the Navy, he said, is that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard says it is training a cadre of suicide bombers capable of attacking U.S. ships. In January, a group of small Iranian speedboats aggressively approached U.S. war ships in the Persian Gulf. After repeated warnings, the boats eventually backed off, but at least one of them, operated by four members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, came close to being fired on by the Navy ships. "The four Iranian Revolutionary Guard people came within 10 seconds of being dead," Cosgriff said. Such an incident could spiral into a larger conflict, which is why Cosgriff says the overarching direction he gives his sailors is "disciplined restraint: Don't allow yourself to be provoked by some local yokel. ln the same breath, I say don't allow yourself to be successfully attacked."

    Source: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9226
    What do you think Armenian is Israel capable of conducting an air strike on the Iranian Nuclear facilities alone, without the help of US troops or Airfields based in Iraq? Could you please tell me where the nuclear sites are located approximately and what kind of arsenal would be used in case of an air strike. Would Iranian air defenses be capable of tracking and/or shooting them down. I know you have some military knowledge, and I would really love to know what you think.

    Leave a comment:


  • Azad
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    This is what I posted in Feb....

    Originally posted by Azad View Post
    Consider it WWIII or what ever shape that will take ... it won't be good.
    The guy hates Russians, wants to tame Islam and his favorite azz to kiss is Israel's. Imagine McCain and Lieberman his Vice President. McCain croaks and we end up with a Lieberman for a president.
    Seams the ape can not function without his masters.

    "June 11 (Bloomberg) -- John McCain might like to give Joseph Lieberman another shot at the vice presidency, this time as a Republican."

    The latest news and headlines from Yahoo News. Get breaking news stories and in-depth coverage with videos and photos.


    Last edited by Azad; 06-12-2008, 05:56 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Armenian
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    Israel to attack Iran unless enrichment stops-minister



    An Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites looks "unavoidable" given the apparent failure of sanctions to deny Tehran technology with bomb-making potential, one of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's deputies said on Friday. "If Iran continues with its programme for developing nuclear weapons, we will attack it. The sanctions are ineffective," Transport Minister Shaul Mofaz told the mass-circulation Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper. "Attacking Iran, in order to stop its nuclear plans, will be unavoidable," said the former army chief who has also been defence minister. It was the most explicit threat yet against Iran from a member of Olmert's government, which, like the Bush administration, has preferred to hint at force as a last resort should U.N. Security Council sanctions be deemed a dead end. Iran has defied Western pressure to abandon its uranium enrichment projects, which it says are for peaceful electricity generation rather than bomb-building. The leadership in Tehran has also threatened to retaliate against Israel -- believed to have the Middle East's only atomic arsenal -- and U.S. targets in the Gulf for any attack on Iran.

    Mofaz also said in the interview that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has called for Israel to be wiped off the map, "would disappear before Israel does." A spokesman for Prime Minister Ehud Olmert did not address Mofaz's comments directly but said that "all options must remain on the table" and said more could be done to put financial pressure on Tehran. "Israel believes strongly that while the U.N. sanctions are positive, much more needs to be done to pressure the regime in Tehran to cease its aggressive nuclear programme," spokesman Mark Regev said. "We believe the international community should be considering further tangible steps such as embargoing refined petroleum headed for Iran, sanctions against Iraninan buisnessmen travelling abroad, tightening the pressure on Iranian financial institutions and other such steps," he added. Mofaz's remarks came as he and several other senior members of Olmert's Kadima Party prepare for a possible run for top office should a corruption scandal force the Israeli prime minister to step down.

    Iranian-born Mofaz has been a main party rival of the Israeli prime minister, particularly following the 2006 elections when Olmert was forced to hand the defence portfolio to Labour, his main coalition partner, at Mofaz's expense. Mofaz, who is also designated as a deputy prime minister, has remained privy to Israel's defence planning. He is a member of Olmert's security cabinet and leads regular strategic coordination talks with the U.S. State Department. Israeli planes destroyed Iraq's nuclear reactor in 1981. A similar Israeli sortie over Syria last September razed what the U.S. administration said was a nascent nuclear reactor built with North Korean help. Syria denied having any such facility. Independent analysts have questioned, however, whether Israel's armed forces can take on Iran alone, as its nuclear sites are numerous, distant and well-fortified. (Additional reporting by Ori Lewis; Editing by Dominic Evans)

    Source: http://wiredispatch.com/news/?id=200782

    U.S. Commander: Iran War Would Be 'Disastrous'


    U.S. Navy's Persian Gulf Commander Says War With Iran Would Cause 'Aftershocks' in the Region

    The top U.S. Navy official in the Persian Gulf warned in an interview with ABC News that war with Iran would be "pretty disastrous," with "echoes and aftershocks" reverberating throughout the region. "Nobody I've spoken to suggests that going to war with Iran is a good thing," Vice Adm. Kevin Cosgriff told ABC News. "The preferred path by far is the diplomatic path, keep working with the international community to bring the right sort of pressure to bear on the Islamic Republic of Iran." For years, there has been a swirl of speculation about the prospects of war, as the United States has accused Iran of arming militias in Iraq, trying to develop nuclear weapons and supporting terrorism. President Bush and other top U.S. officials have repeatedly stressed diplomacy when it comes to Iran, but say "all options are on the table," including the military option.

    If it did come to waging war with Iran, Adm. Cosgriff's forces would likely play a central role. As the head of the Fifth Fleet, he is the commander of U.S. naval forces in the Persian Gulf. "As I look at the landscape, we should just sort of keep the pressure on, the big pressure, diplomatic, economic," he said. "Part of that [pressure] is for military forces, in this case the United States Fifth Fleet, to say we intend to be able to conduct operations in that part of the world in support of our friends and U.S. interests without being harassed or threatened by you, because we are not threatening you," Cosgriff said. "We have been there for decades; we are going to be there for decades." Cosgriff believes "we have years" to deal with Iran's nuclear program because "It's going to take them a while to do all it will take to finish all the work that needs to go into developing a weapon," but he fears that a miscalculation or misunderstanding could lead to military conflict with the United States.

    One worrying development being carefully watched by the Navy, he said, is that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard says it is training a cadre of suicide bombers capable of attacking U.S. ships. In January, a group of small Iranian speedboats aggressively approached U.S. war ships in the Persian Gulf. After repeated warnings, the boats eventually backed off, but at least one of them, operated by four members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, came close to being fired on by the Navy ships. "The four Iranian Revolutionary Guard people came within 10 seconds of being dead," Cosgriff said. Such an incident could spiral into a larger conflict, which is why Cosgriff says the overarching direction he gives his sailors is "disciplined restraint: Don't allow yourself to be provoked by some local yokel. ln the same breath, I say don't allow yourself to be successfully attacked."

    Source: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9226

    Leave a comment:


  • Armenian
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    World Iranologists to gather in Yerevan


    Armenia will host a conference on the unity and diversity of Iran and the Caucasus to examine the country's influence on the region. Iranologists from across the world will gather at the international conference titled Iran and the Caucasus: Unity and Diversity to examine various cultural aspects of the region. The conference will address the main principles of cultural unity, diversity, interaction and the peaceful coexistence of various civilizations in the resion. The Irano-Caucasian geographical region covers contemporary Iran, Iraq, Armenia, the Republic of Azerbaijan, Georgia, the Northern Caucasus, Eastern Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan and those of the Central Asian countries, all of which have been strongly influenced by Iran in social, cultural and political terms. With its ethnic, linguistic and cultural diversity and uniqueness, the Caucasus still preserves many elements of the Iranian cultural heritage.

    Source: http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id...onid=351020105

    Leave a comment:


  • Armenian
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    Russian Gazprom to invest 200m dollars in Iran-Armenia gas pipeline



    Armenia’s Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Armen Movsisyan has said that by the end of 2009, the Russian gas giant Gazprom will invest more than 200m US dollars in the construction of the Iran-Armenia gas pipeline, the Armenian news agency Arminfo reported. After the completion of construction work, Armenia will have access to another alternative gas pipeline along with the current one from Russia and based on the prices that are offered, will decide which of them it should use. Currently, Armenia pays Russian Gazprom 110 US dollars per 1,000 cu.m. of gas, however, the price will change from 1 January 2009, the agency quoted Movsisyan as saying. During his press conference, Armen Movsisyan also touched on the construction of an oil refinery outside Yerevan which will cost two or three billion US dollars. The plant, which will be able to process 7.5m tons of Iranian crude oil per year, will produce petrol and diesel, the agency said. Speaking about energy projects with Iran, the minister mentioned that a joint hydroelectric power station will be constructed on the border river Araz. The construction of the station with a capacity of about 140 MW will be financed by Iran and will cost 240-250m US dollars. The construction work may commence in 2008, the minister said. The minister went on to say that the USA and the EU have allocated 10-12m US dollars to update the security of the Armenian nuclear power plant, Arminfo said. Up to now, technical assistance worth 90m US dollars has been allocated to update the security of the plant, the agency quoted the minister as saying. Armen Movsisyan added that it is planned to build a new nuclear block in Armenia in 2016 when the existing energy block of the nuclear plant expires. Even though Armenian legislation allows foreign investors to own 100 per cent of stocks, the government intends to control half of the project stocks, the minister said. “If the government does not take part in the project, then this project has no real significance for us,” Arminfo quoted Movsisyan as saying. However, the operation of the current nuclear block will not be suspended until the new one is built, the minister said. He noted that the technical feasibility of the new plant will be completed by September, the agency said.

    Source: http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=170176

    Leave a comment:


  • Armenian
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    RUSSIA AND THE IRANIAN BOMB



    by J. R. Nyquist

    On Aug. 23 Frontpagemagazine.com interviewed Regnar Rasmussen, a military expert and interrogation specialist. The interview is of interest because of Rasmussen’s testimony indicating that Iran purchased nuclear warheads from the “former” Soviet Union in autumn 1992. This is a story that confirms a similar claim made by Yossef Bodansky in his book The High Cost of Peace. Bodansky says the Iranians initially intended to use their newly acquired nuclear weapons in a jihad to destroy Israel. The plan involved strategic coordination with Hezbollah, Syria and communist North Korea (which agreed to a simultaneous attack against American forces in the Far East). Tehran asked its terrorist allies “to refrain temporarily from attacking Western objectives in order not to attract attention to the Iranian-sponsored buildup until they were ready to strike out decisively.” Once the necessary forces were in place, Hezbollah was to play a unique role by setting up the pretext for a devastating assault on Israel. According to Bodansky, Hezbollah would provoke Israel into “a major escalation in Lebanon – so that the planned Syrian and Iranian ballistic-missile barrage against Israeli civilian and strategic objectives could be presented as retaliation for Israeli aggression.” Bodansky also says that a simultaneous terrorist offensive would be launched against the United States while Iranian kamikaze-style attacks would be organized against U.S. aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf.

    As Bodansky explained in his book, an Iranian nuclear assault on Israel was thwarted when an Israeli helicopter gunship attacked and killed Sheikh Sayyid Abbas al-Mussawi, the secretary-general of Hezbollah (roughly coinciding with the demise of North Korea’s dictator and a subsequent transition crisis in Pyongyang). Those who doubted the veracity of Bodansky’s work must now account for the testimony of Rasmussen, who learned many things from Iranian asylum seekers, including Iranian communists who had been trained in Soviet bloc countries. “The education was genuine and serious,” said Rasmussen, “but what really made my hairs stand on one end was the immense overweight of practical training in the preparation and use of explosives. It was taught to the Iranian students even down to the minutest details that these skills were deemed necessary if their ‘revolutionary aims’ were to succeed.”

    The Russians also trained Middle Eastern men at the science of engineering, not so much from the standpoint of building large structures, but from the standpoint of knocking them down at a single blow. The communist bloc had an overall plan when it initiated its massive course of instruction for Muslim youth. And it was Rasmussen’s sense of this plan that was awakened as he watched the events of 9/11 unfold five years ago. “It is very important to bear in mind that the Iranians were nothing more than a tiny minority amongst the recruits of the Soviet Union,” he explained. “My Iranians told me that they had to stick together and protect each other … against the hordes of Arabs surrounding them everywhere on campus.”

    Although the majority of communists in revolutionary Iran were slated for Islamic persecution, an elite subset of communists (trained in the Soviet Union) ended up working for the Islamic regime. “I would describe this group as the most dangerous and unpredictable of them all,” noted Rasmussen. The best and toughest communist agents working in Islamic Iran were tasked with infiltrating the Islamic hierarchy and intelligence services. The purpose of this infiltration should be obvious to any student of strategy: namely, to steer a regime of fanatical psychopaths toward conflict with America. This would not prove difficult because, as Rasmussen pointed out in the Frontpagemagazine.com interview, communism and Islamic fundamentalism share a common hatred of individualism and Western values. Furthermore, in terms of Moscow’s current objectives in the fight against Islamic terrorism, the Russians retain the files of each and every foreign student ever trained in the Soviet Bloc. So why haven’t they shared these files with the United States? (The answer should be abundantly clear.)

    It seems that the Russians are following the same path they followed during the Cold War. As for Moscow’s supposed war against Islamic terrorism in Chechnya, the Chechen conflict is nothing more than a KGB/GRU organized provocation. The mild and unorthodox Islam practiced by the Chechen people bears no resemblance to the more virulent forms of Islam practiced in the Middle East. Furthermore, the terrorism of the Chechen bandits has been described by former KGB/FSB officer Alexander Litvinenko as staged diversionary operation for renewing Russia’s police state under the leadership of Vladimir Putin. According to Litvinenko, Chechen terrorism was organized and directed, from the outset, by Russian special services and the Russian General Staff. Last year, in an interview with a Polish journalist, Litvinenko stated that bin Laden’s right hand man, Ayman al-Zawahiri, is a long-time KGB agent trained in Russia.

    Given all of this, it should not surprise anyone that Iran may have acquired nuclear weapons from the Soviet Union. According to Rasmussen, Russia trained many Iranian physicists (a fact reported by many researchers). And Russia continues to train Iranian nuclear experts, as a matter of policy. As anyone who consults a newspaper will see, the Russians will not back down from this activity. Together with their communist Chinese allies, the Russians lend practical support to the Iranians by threatening to use their veto in the U.N. Security Council (to prevent economic sanctions against the Iranian mullahs).

    How did the Iranians acquire nuclear weapons from the former Soviet Union?

    Rasmussen describes his involvement with sincere Soviet intellectuals who were moving toward political power after the collapse of Soviet power. The political failure of these people was due, says Rasmussen, to the “intrigues and dirty workings of the old KGB structures behind the curtain we all thought had fallen.” He further added, “Alas, no curtain ever fell. It was only moved to a position further backwards and deep into the dark shades of backstage.” Such a position is necessary if one intends to trigger a nuclear exchange between Muslim and Western countries.

    It was a matter of profit and strategic convenience that the communist boss of Soviet Khazakstan, Nursultan Nazerbayev, sold three nuclear warheads to the Islamic leaders in Tehran. The price was supposedly $7.5 billion. This story has been confirmed by other sources, and has remained a closely guarded secret of the Israeli and American governments. Obviously, the Iranians could use the acquired Soviet nukes as models for making their own weapons. Furthermore, it may only be a matter of time before they initiate a nuclear war against Israel and the United States on their own timetable (in coordination with their Chinese, North Korean, Syrian and Russian allies).

    A strategic sequence logically follows from the thinking of Iran’s leadership, which may be summarized by the oft-heard cry of “death to Israel, death to America.”

    Source: http://www.financialsense.com/stormw...2006/0825.html

    Leave a comment:


  • freakyfreaky
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    Then, of course, you have this line of thought.

    4/10/06 - video mashes Beach Boys "Barbara Ann" with George Bush and xxxx Cheney singing about bombing Iran. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...26890212250833

    4/18/07 McCain jokes singing "bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran."


    1/08 - Senator Joe Lieberman helps Republican presidential candidate woo xxxish vote in Florida for the Republican primary. http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satelli...cle%2FShowFull

    3/08 - McCain visits Middle East with Lieberman in tow. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/19/us...+mccain&st=nyt

    3/08 - McCain says he was joking when he sang about bombing Iran. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2v8c...eature=related

    Joe Lieberman is a honorary co-chairman of the Committee of Present Danger. http://www.committeeonthepresentdanger.org/

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X