Iraq Quiz

[Darorinag]

I said they should be crushed because they are attacking civilians. If they had only attacked non-civilians, I would not have said it. I still stand by what I said. I said the reasons U.S.A went to war were not justified. I don't think USA went to war on Iraq because of terrorists. That is why I don't think it was justifiable, because they tried to fool people into believing that they were waging a war on terrorism when their intention wasn't even close to that.

[Anonymouse]

Shouldn't the U.S. and Europe be crushed for attacking civilians historically? Britain should definitely be crushed for the 500,000 Iraqi children that died because of the UN Sanctions and the no fly zone and bombings. You have superb logic thank you.

[Darorinag]

Shouldn't the U.S. and Europe be crushed for attacking civilians historically? Britain should definitely be crushed for the 500,000 Iraqi children that died because of the UN Sanctions and the no fly zone and bombings. You have superb logic thank you.

What's done is done. You can't go back in time and hold today's people responsible for what happened 200 years ago. Or whenever. And I think Britain is getting crushed anyway. And guess by whom? You're a smart kid, you can figure it out. They start with I, P, B, and J.

[Anonymouse]

The point is everyone has killed civilians, so why are you now proclaiming to be on the moral high ground by only holding the muslim fanatics responsible? Your whole rant had nothing to do Iraq, the initial thread, but more of your white nationalist leanings.

[Darorinag]

Holding the Muslim fanatics responsible? Wtf are you talking about? Responsible for what? Everyone is responsible for their actions. You can't expect them to take shots at people and the other side folding their arms and not doing anything about it. It takes two to tango. It's safe to say that the Arabs brought this on themselves. All of this, not just Iraq. With their illogical fanaticism. At least the zionists are logically fanatic and know what they're doing.

I blame all who disrespect the rules of morality and attack & kill unarmed people. You don't. You only blame USA with your pseudo-political analyses...

[Anonymouse]

Illogical fanaticism existed before the war party invaded. Logical fanaticism came after. Illogical fanaticism exists in everything, even white nationalists. These people do not just wake up one day and say "Well, I think I'm going to go bomb the United States". Still no case there Danny.

[Darorinag]

How is killing a civilian hostage "logical fanaticism"? Not even killing a military hostage is justified. It is illogical. Logical fanaticism leads to illogical fanaticism. Besides, if they wanted an all-Muslim country, why not unite with all the rest of the Arabs? Fact is, they are too divided and in their division are too illogically fanatic that they start conflicts even if there are none. Fanaticism is the root of all conflicts.

And this is off-topic but I don't see how white nationalism is illogically fanatic. we don't collectively target civilians, do we? perhaps in discussions we do, but not physically. which is why I have problems with fanatic Muslims and to a certain extent zionists.

[Anonymouse]

How is it justified? I already explained there are causal relationships in effect, nothing happens without a previous trigger, because of the synthesis that led to these events, better known as desperation. So when Muslims are fanatic against purging out the invaders, white nationalists are not. Contradictions are a plenty.

[dstyle]

Back to my point Israel is a terrorist state, but its ok they're the US's ally.

[Darorinag]

How is it justified? I already explained there are causal relationships in effect, nothing happens without a previous trigger, because of the synthesis that led to these events, better known as desperation. So when Muslims are fanatic against purging out the invaders, white nationalists are not. Contradictions are a plenty.

Action-reaction?! Wtf are you on? Muslims have always been fanatic. They've spread their religion through the sword. Get out of here. And you're gonna bring in the example of the crusades, that was well into the spread of Christianity... If the Muslims hadn't been so fanatic and hadn't spread their religion through the sword, we wouldn't be seeing any Muslims today. Islam is more of a way of living. And the Qur'an is more of a rulebook of behaviour. Ever wondered why Muslims never developed? Also, about Judaism, ever wondered why they practised circumsision? The most fanatical among the 3 main religions are the Muslims. I think Armenians have experienced a bit of this. But what do you care. All you care about is spurting anti-U.S. propaganda.