Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Question for Dan

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    You guys need to stop "arguing" with Dan. He's like a little kid, whatever points you prove, he'll just come back and say they are exceptions.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Seapahn
      Here are a few more to add to your collection of exceptions ... from the same friend. These are some "exceptional" famous black orchestral composers.

      Akpabot, Samuel
      Amu, Ephraim
      Bankole, Ayo
      El-Dabh, Halim
      Euba, Akin
      Nketia, Joseph Hanson Kwabena
      Turkson, Ato Alphonso
      Adams, Leslie H.
      Anderson, Thomas Jefferson
      Baker, David
      Batiste, Alvin
      Belaka, O'Sai Tutu (Charles Bell, Sr.)
      Bland, Edward Osmund
      Brown, Uzee
      Carter, Warwick L.
      Clark, Edgar Rogie
      Clay, Omar
      Cloud, Lee Vernell
      Cunningham, Arthur
      Da Costa, Noel G.
      Dédé, Edmund
      Dennis, Mark Andrew, Jr.
      xxxxerson, Roger Donald
      Duncan, John
      Fischer, William S.
      Fountain, Primous,
      Furman, James B.
      Hailstork, Adolphus Cunningham,
      Hakim, Talib Rasul
      Hammond, Douglas
      Hanxxxx, Eugene Wilson
      Handy, Dorothy Antoinette
      Harris, Robert A.
      Hayes, Joseph
      Holden, James, Jr.
      Holland, Justin Minor
      Holmes, Robert L.
      Humble, K.
      Jeffers, George
      Jenkins, Leroy
      Johnson, Frank
      Johnson, James Louis
      Kay, Ulysses Simpson
      Kennedy, Joseph J., Jr.
      Kerr, Thomas H., Jr.
      Lambert, Lucien
      Lampley, Calvin Douglas
      Lateef, Yusef
      Lewis, John Aaron
      Logan, Wendell Morris
      McCall, Maurice Henderson
      McCreary, Richard Deming, Jr.
      McDaniels, William Foster
      McLean, Hamilton G.
      McLin, Lena Johnson
      Mells, Herbert Franklin
      Mitchell, Roscoe
      Moore, Carman Leroy
      Moore, Dorothy Rudd
      Moore, Kermit
      Moore, Undine Smith
      Nelson, Kalvert Jalalu
      Nelson, Oliver Edward
      Perry, Julia Amanda
      Pickett, Donald
      Price, Florence Beatrice Smith
      Price, John Elwood
      Rollins, Theodore Walter
      Singleton, Alvin
      Smith, Hale
      Stewart, Earl L.
      Still, William Grant
      Swanson, Howard
      Thomas, Russell, Jr.
      Tillis, Fredrick Charles
      Tyler, Robert
      Walker, George Theophilus
      White, Andrew N.,
      White, Clarence Cameron
      Williams, Kimo Lafayette
      Wilson, Olly
      Cordero, Roque
      Gutiérrez y Espinosa, Felipe
      Leon, Tania J.
      Roldan, Amadeo
      Bridgetower, George Polgreen
      Camilleri, Charles
      Coleridge-Taylor, Samuel
      Saint-Georges, Chevalier de (Joseph Boulogne)
      Sancho, Ignatius
      And that is why they are not famous the world over, and why composers such as Bach, Mozart, Chopen, Vivaldi, Beethoven, Wagner, Tchaikovsky, are far more famous and preferred. And I am to guess this is because of overt "racism" that we don't know about these great black composers. Really, let's stop with this egalitarian sillyness of trying to prove "we are all equal".
      Achkerov kute.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Anonymouse
        Really, let's stop with this egalitarian sillyness of trying to prove "we are all equal".
        Why would you assume this is about proving/disproving equality? I thought this thread was about "Has there ever been a black or Jewish person who was a good person or who came up with an original idea?"

        i.e. we are pondering the question of existence rather than proportions. Of course Dan's childish counter argument is "exceptions" while in the grand scheme of things, that (i.e. acknowleding existence of exceptions) in itself proves the existence of intelligent blacks which completely undermines Dan's wonderful fantasy world of Blacks being monkeys from Affrica.
        Last edited by Sip; 04-24-2004, 08:59 PM.
        this post = teh win.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Seapahn
          I thought this thread was about "Has there ever been a black or Jewish person who was a good person or who came up with an original idea?"
          Okay, my mistake. The answer is obviously 'Yes'.
          Achkerov kute.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Anonymouse
            Okay, my mistake. The answer is obviously 'Yes'.
            Well, we already know you are intelligent (although some others may claim that is debatable). But that's probably why the thread was titled "Question for Dan"
            this post = teh win.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Seapahn
              Well, we already know you are intelligent (although some others may claim that is debatable). But that's probably why the thread was titled "Question for Dan"
              Well, I'm not intelligent, I'm just good at posting long protracted posts and copy and pasting for the most part. But Dan has a way of arguing against facts with opinions, and if not, there is always the " " defense mechanism which kicks in right about when there are insufficient responses. But it's okay for Grandpa Jones loves Dan!
              Achkerov kute.

              Comment


              • #97
                By the way Dan, you never quite effectively answered to me why war on Muslims is justified simply because they are "fanatic Muslims".
                Achkerov kute.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Anonymouse
                  By the way Dan, you never quite effectively answered to me why war on Muslims is justified simply because they are "fanatic Muslims".
                  I don't believe any of this fanatic muslim crap. Islam is a nifty recruitment tool for the osama bin losers of the world. If you can't convince someone there's a god and heaven how are you gonna convince them to kill themselves for you. I bet even bin laden doesn't believe his own crap at the end of long days in the cave.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    By the way Dan, you never quite effectively answered to me why war on Muslims is justified simply because they are "fanatic Muslims".
                    There is a difference in being fanatic in your belief and using that fanaticism as a jumping point to other evil acts. In modern times, no Christian country has ever done that. USA certainly didn't attack Iraq for religious reasons, that's for sure. Whereas many many Muslims preach hatred based on religion.

                    Comment


                    • Yes, way to go Seapahn, naming 3 people in each field makes them the "rule" rather than the "exception." Way to go. As Fadi would say, I would've posted the names of millions of white contributors, but I have a life.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X