Last I checked, I wasn't a spokesperson of all Armenians.
No, knowledgeable denial is not "knowing the facts and still denying the genocide." Here's a definition of denial:
"A refusal to accept or believe something, such as a doctrine or belief."
You might have knowledgeable reasons to refuse to accept a theory about the genocide. To each argument, there are two sides. And don't tell me "there is proof that the Armenian genocide took place", because that's not the point. Point is, denial doesn't necessarily refer to something that DID happen. For example, the entire world might believe in the holocaust story, but I might think that it didn't happen, and use historical facts, etc. to prove that it didn't. Some of my facts might be wrong, and even if the holocaust did really take place, I might make some knowledgeable arguments instead of just saying "screw that, there was no genocide" without supporting my claims.
No, knowledgeable denial is not "knowing the facts and still denying the genocide." Here's a definition of denial:
"A refusal to accept or believe something, such as a doctrine or belief."
You might have knowledgeable reasons to refuse to accept a theory about the genocide. To each argument, there are two sides. And don't tell me "there is proof that the Armenian genocide took place", because that's not the point. Point is, denial doesn't necessarily refer to something that DID happen. For example, the entire world might believe in the holocaust story, but I might think that it didn't happen, and use historical facts, etc. to prove that it didn't. Some of my facts might be wrong, and even if the holocaust did really take place, I might make some knowledgeable arguments instead of just saying "screw that, there was no genocide" without supporting my claims.
Comment